Quantcast

Bush's battle cry wows Nat'l Guard

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
Bush's battle cry wows Nat'l Guard
New York Daily News | 2/18/04 | KENNETH R. BAZINET

WASHINGTON - President Bush swooped into a National Guard base yesterday to deliver a chest-thumping defense of the Iraq war and his stewardship of the fight against terror.
"My resolve is the same as it was on the day when I walked in the rubble of the twin towers," he told National Guard members and their families in Louisiana, sounding a message he's banking will get him reelected.

"I will not relent until this threat to America is removed - and neither will you," he said to wild whoops from a sea of green uniforms.

Bush, whose own Guard service has been called into question by Democrats, seemed defiant in choosing the base. Two days earlier, the Republican crowed about his Guard service at the Daytona 500 as he inspected a stock car sponsored by the service.

"What a week. First, NASCAR. And today, Fort Polk, La.," Bush said.

Bush used his presidential pulpit to deliver his most spirited defense yet of his decision to go to war.

"My administration looked at intelligence information, and we saw danger," he said. "Members of Congress looked at the same intelligence, and they saw danger."

Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein used "weapons of mass destruction against his own people," he added, and since 1998, when Democrat Bill Clinton was President, it has been "the policy of the United States to change the regime in Iraq."

The President said the U.S. decided after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks it was time to play hardball with despots like Saddam, challenging him to show what he did with the banned weapons he had in the past.

"Saddam Hussein chose defiance. And we had a choice of our own: Either take the word of a madman or take action to defend America and the world. Faced with that choice, I will defend America every time," Bush said.

Fort Polk is home to the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment, a workhorse unit in Iraq that has lost 12 member there. Of the 538 G.I.s slain in the country, 43 have been Guardsmen. Bush made no mention of a pending probe of prewar intelligence.

After his battle cry, Democrats avoided attacking Bush over his National Guard duty in the 1970s, instead taking aim at the disruptions he has caused Guard families by sending weekend warriors to Iraq.

"This administration has overextended our troops, broken his promise to America's veterans, deployed the National Guard indefinitely while leaving their families with financial hardship," Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry said in a statement.

But Bush is banking on convincing America that the sacrifices have been worth it. "We have made America more secure," he told the crowd of more than 5,000.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
After his battle cry, Democrats avoided attacking Bush over his National Guard duty in the 1970s, instead taking aim at the disruptions he has caused Guard families by sending weekend warriors to Iraq.

"This administration has overextended our troops, broken his promise to America's veterans, deployed the National Guard indefinitely while leaving their families with financial hardship," Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry said in a statement.
If the Dim's hadn't cut the active military so deeply in an effort to appear to "reduce governemet" there wouldn't be much of a need to send Guard and Reserves into country.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
Originally posted by N8
If the Dim's hadn't cut the active military so deeply in an effort to appear to "reduce governemet" there wouldn't be much of a need to send Guard and Reserves into country.
wow, you gave an opinion that was yours? Awesome!

But you can also argue the reverse that if we didn't go into Iraq, the plan the Dem's put into action would've been more than adequate. And we did not *need* to go into Iraq. Remember, I still support the action, but we didn't have to do it.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
Originally posted by N8
If the Dim's hadn't cut the active military so deeply in an effort to appear to "reduce governemet" there wouldn't be much of a need to send Guard and Reserves into country.
wow, you gave an opinion that was yours? Awesome!

But you can also argue the reverse that if we didn't go into Iraq, the plan the Dem's put into action would've been more than adequate. And we did not *need* to go into Iraq. Remember, I still support the action, but we didn't have to do it.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
Ah, the New York Daily News. The pinnacle of objective thorough reporting. I particularly like the headline: "Bush WOWS..."

How do they know he "wowwed" them? Did they conduct a survey... even an informal one?

N8, here's a hint. If it's REAL newz (nuze [noosz]) it will have a headline that looks something like:
"Bush Cites Own Service in Pep Talk to Reservists" or
"Reservists assemble for wartime rally with Bush"

When you hit a ridiculous assumption before you even make it to the first line of the article, that should probably set off some alarms.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,392
22,468
Sleazattle
Originally posted by N8
If the Dim's hadn't cut the active military so deeply in an effort to appear to "reduce governemet" there wouldn't be much of a need to send Guard and Reserves into country.
The military cuts started to happen back when Bush Sr was in office. Not to mention that when Clinton was in office Congress was held by the Republicans. And last time I checked the congress passes all the spending bills. At the time there was no need to maintian a very large military, it made no sense. Think back to before 2001, no one was looking at two major long distance campaigns.
 
Originally posted by Westy
The military cuts started to happen back when Bush Sr was in office. Not to mention that when Clinton was in office Congress was held by the Republicans. And last time I checked the congress passes all the spending bills. At the time there was no need to maintian a very large military, it made no sense. Think back to before 2001, no one was looking at two major long distance campaigns.
Dad Gummit Westy. I was baiting N8. And you come along and spoiled it. Oh well. It was indeed a Republican held Congress that did most of the cutting. Hardly Clinton's cross to bear alone.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Originally posted by ohio
Ah, the New York Daily News. The pinnacle of objective thorough reporting. I particularly like the headline: "Bush WOWS..."

How do they know he "wowwed" them? Did they conduct a survey... even an informal one?

N8, here's a hint. If it's REAL newz (nuze [noosz]) it will have a headline that looks something like:
"Bush Cites Own Service in Pep Talk to Reservists" or
"Reservists assemble for wartime rally with Bush"

When you hit a ridiculous assumption before you even make it to the first line of the article, that should probably set off some alarms.
Not necessarily, Ohio.
Im sure you've been through some newswriting classes...a headline should capture the mood of the story while giving a brief intro of the lead. If the crowd seemed "Wowed" to the reporter, than by all means...it deserved to be in the story.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
Originally posted by BurlySurly
If the crowd seemed "Wowed" to the reporter, than by all means...it deserved to be in the story.
It wasn't IN the story. No mention at all of the crowd response in the text. ONLY the headline. That's sensationalist tabloid-style journalism, that serves to slant all the facts in the article towards a certain opinion/conclusion. You would NEVER see that type of headline in broad-sheet newsprint, but even if you did it would be followed up as a significant component of the story.