Quantcast

rokcore

Chimp
Feb 17, 2021
44
5
TLDR: Bad paint, inaccurate exploded diagram and broken Parktool

I bought a YT Capra in March of 2019. From the very beginning the paint on the bike started chipping within the first couple months and not just in exposed areas. Paint was chipping in areas that would not be exposed to rocks (such as the top of the arm connecting the seat stay / front triangle). Not a huge deal...at first. After a year riding the bike the paint was at a point where many areas had paint chips. Down tube, chain stays, seat stays, and the small connecting arms were all affected. So I reached out to YT to get some touch up paint.



-----------------------------------
Hi,

I ordered a bike last year, order number -------, and have been having issues with the paint chipping in various spots on the frame. Is there any chance of purchasing a touch up paint kit? Or where to purchase something similar?

Thanks!
-----------------------------------

YT Response:
Hey _,

Thanks for reaching out to YT!

Unfortunately we do not have touch up paint available however you may be able to find a good match at a paint supply store using a touch up pen etc..

Shred safe out there,
_
-----------------------------------



It sucks but sure the paint isn't in warranty. I would understand this if the paint wasn't chipping from the very start, not very happy that they didn't have touch up paint or even paint codes for the bike. So I kept riding. Until recently I had no issues but there's now so many exposed areas that I don't want to risk having any more aluminum exposed. So I started the process of tearing down the bike to repaint or powder coat the frame (I understand this voids the warranty which would have been fine). I looked at the exploded drawings for the bike and determined the park tool suspension bearing kit would have no issues with removing these bearings. Wrong. The first few came out without issue and then I got to the seat stay bearings. On the exploded diagram the entire seat stay bearing hardware is shown going in from one side of the frame so a reasonable person could assume that hardware also comes out from the same side. So I put the park tool bearing kit to it, got a little tough but kept going based on the drawing information, and ended up breaking the tool (Shout out to park tools for no questions asked replacement). Even more paint cracked at this point which isn't a concern since that's the whole point of the tear down. I'm more concerned about the integrity of the aluminum now.

At this point I was very unhappy with the quality of the bike. So I contacted YT support again. Their response was that the bearings come out from either side of the seat stay.




-----------------------------------

Hey _,

Thanks for reaching out!

Sorry to hear that you are having difficulty removing these bearings.

I just want to confirm that you are trying to remove the bearings out of their own sides.

The bearings have to be pulled one at a time as there is a center lip that prohibits them from being pressed out of the same side.

Cheers,
__


I explained that the paint was now further cracked using a proper tool for the job (assuming the diagrams were right) which means any service to the bike would just crack more paint. It's one thing for paint to chip after a couple years out in the sun but I don't ride often enough for this to be an issue and the bike is always stored inside. I also said there's nothing in the diagram indicating these bearings are directional. So they responded again



__

Hey _,

I am presently using an Enduro bearing slide hammer in the workshop to remove bearings from our frames.

With this style extractor there is nothing that touches the frame so it is much easier to remove bearings without paint damage.

Sorry to hear about the paint damage that has happened.

Cheers,
___



Now I'm pissed off that they're implying the tool I chose is wrong. Anyone who has the SBK can say there's no issue with removing other bearings when pressed out from the correct sides.

___

_
,

I don't see how this is useful for resolving the issue I am having. The frame paint wasn't done properly from the start and I shouldn't have to buy a new tool to service the bike because the paint was falling off right after buying it. I successfully removed the other back to back bearings on the bike and there's nothing on the diagram indicating these should be removed from opposite sides.

To be clear, I would like a replacement frame as this doesn't just affect working on the bearings. The paint wasn't properly done even before receiving the bike and attempting to fix this issue myself (because of a poor response to my paint request initially) has resulted in broken tools (thankfully park tools is replacing this via warranty) from a poor exploded diagram and even further damage to the paint. I don't expect a showroom finish but even in it's original state the paint would rattle off from a season of riding. I'm not an engineer but exposing the aluminum would be a safety issue for the bike which is the whole reason for fixing this in the first place.

Without a replacement frame I don't see this issue being resolved. There's plenty of bikes that have paint in good condition after 10 years of riding such as my previous bike and can be more easily serviced.

-__

___



At this point their warranty lead gets involved

____
Hello __,

I am __, the Warranty Lead here at YT USA.

I totally understand where you are coming from!

Unfortunately our warranty period does not cover paint defects or paint issues.

In this case we would be unable to provide a warranty case for you.

As far as the bearings go, they can be tough to remove, and that is why we typically advise utilizing a professional mechanic for this service.

In this case I do suggest that you run by a trusted bike shop to have those bearings swapped out for you.

Please let us know if you need any additional assistance.

Cheers,
_

_




Now they are suggesting that a routine service task should be done by a professional mechanic even though I have a quality tool to do so. I respond again



_,

If the exploded diagram for this model year indicated that the bearings be removed from either side it would not have been an issue and I could have selected the proper tool for removal instead of destroying my ParkTool SBK. A LBS mechanic could have easily made the same assumption given that the exploded diagram shows other parts going in from either side (See the arms connecting the seat stays to the front triangle). In the future I suggest a diagram that breaks the bike apart further, is accurate to which side all parts are installed and suggesting correct tools for removal. Suggesting a professional mechanic for routine service is not an answer for inaccurate diagrams; the very same diagrams a professional shop would reference for service.

-_


_


Hello ____,

The exploded diagram is primarily used for a visualization of the hardware to easier determine the correct order of installation.

In this case it shows where the bearings go, but isn't intended to provide instruction regarding removal.

Instructions like that would be best directed towards our service team so we can provide you with the best methods for removal.

Cheers,
____

_

____,

In that case the diagram is inaccurate and does not correctly show the placement of the seat stay bearings in relation to the frame.

If the frame cannot be replaced for cosmetic/potential structure damage then there is nothing else you can do for me and I don't want to waste any more of our time

-____

Capra Diagram



No offer to check the seat stays, replace the seat stays, no warranty, no touch up paint, and not an acknowledgement of the drawing indicating the wrong order of parts. I just cannot wrap my head around why this is incorrect since many CAD programs will automatically do exploded drawings for you. Don't get me wrong, the bike rides good, but good luck getting help once they have your money. I hope this prevents someone else from making the same mistake as I did and a hard lesson learned to look at manufacturer documentation prior to purchasing a bike. My previous bike, a 2010 Yeti 575, was 8 years old when I bought it but there were no paint chips despite scratches on the frame. My coworkers, who crash more often and harder than I do, also have zero issues with their frames ranging from Trek, Yeti, Pivot, and Scott frames. What gives YT?
 

rideit

Bob the Builder
Aug 24, 2004
24,638
12,454
In the cleavage of the Tetons
Well, sure, it’s not really acceptable, but there is a teenie-weenie bit of ‘you get what you pay for’ expectations and reality going on here.
im just razzing this dude’s first post ever.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
88,748
26,966
media blackout
Well, sure, it’s not really acceptable, but there is a teenie-weenie bit of ‘you get what you pay for’ expectations and reality going on here.
im just razzing this dude’s first post ever.
Over on vital there are people who have been waiting 6+ months on warranty parts - swingarms, front triangles etc.
 

Adventurous

Starshine Bro
Mar 19, 2014
10,840
9,875
Crawlorado
Per their Limited Warranty:

"The warranty provided by this Section 9 warranties that the YT Industries frame or component parts, as applicable, will remain free from material defects and defects in workmanship for the period set out in Section 9.1 above. This warranty does not extend to, or include parts subject to wear and tear or damage to paintwork/iodization."

Sucks, but anything they choose to do or not do will be at their discretion, and is not guaranteed under their warranty.
 

rokcore

Chimp
Feb 17, 2021
44
5
all of your 'damage' appears to be normal usage. stop being a princess and go ride your bike...
Normal usage would be this level of damage after many years of riding. Most of this was within the first year. There were paint chips hiding by the ISCG-05 mounting bolts (How would damage happen there? when it's protected by the bash guard) There's no justification for the quality of the paint
 

rokcore

Chimp
Feb 17, 2021
44
5
Per their Limited Warranty:

"The warranty provided by this Section 9 warranties that the YT Industries frame or component parts, as applicable, will remain free from material defects and defects in workmanship for the period set out in Section 9.1 above. This warranty does not extend to, or include parts subject to wear and tear or damage to paintwork/iodization."

Sucks, but anything they choose to do or not do will be at their discretion, and is not guaranteed under their warranty.
I'm not concerned about the paint. That was a given and the whole point of taking the bike apart in the first place (which shouldn't even be needed). I'm concerned that the frame is now damaged and unsafe to ride after trying to pull the bearings out. The issue is that their exploded diagram shows nothing about bearings going in from both sides. It shows them going in from one side. If I had known it was from both sides I would have used the correct tool to pull them. The paint is just the trigger for the whole situation and no help with paint codes, touch up, etc. The suggestion to use a professional mechanic for a mail order bike is also pretty insulting
 
Last edited:

rokcore

Chimp
Feb 17, 2021
44
5
is this what your complaining about?








all of your 'damage' is simply normal usage. stop being a princess, quit wasting everyone's time and go ride your bike...
You completely conveniently excluded the pictures where paint chipped in spots that shouldn't be chipped. What bikes have you seen where this level of paint damage has happened within 2 years and <200 miles of riding?
 

maxyedor

<b>TOOL PRO</b>
Oct 20, 2005
5,496
3,141
In the bathroom, fighting a battle
Normal usage would be this level of damage after many years of riding. Most of this was within the first year. There were paint chips hiding by the ISCG-05 mounting bolts (How would damage happen there? when it's protected by the bash guard) There's no justification for the quality of the paint
It's really not though. If you ride regularly, especially where it's rocky, that's a month or two worth of damage. YT is well known for shitty customer service, but this is honestly just not a warranty issue.

That paint chip on the ISCG tab is more than likely from setting the frame down on the ISCG tab, typical impact damage from a sharp corner contacting a hard surface, also not a warranty issue.

I can't figure out WTF you're talking about with paint damage around the bearing, but have never screwed up paint pulling a bearing no matter how janky the tool I used was, so there's that.


Quit worrying about it, put some stickers on it and ride it.
 

dump

Turbo Monkey
Oct 12, 2001
8,463
5,100
Paint defn looks well within the realm of paint. I have seen better paint, but I wouldn't get upset over this.

Bringing up the paint with customer service when your real issue is the bearing and diagram weakens your case.

Live, learn. Pay now or pay later... hopefully not both!
 
Last edited:
...the issue is that their exploded diagram shows nothing about bearings going in from both sides. It shows them going in from one side. If I had known it was from both sides I would have used the correct tool to pull them...
yet you know that in any situation in the world, the bearing press in from their corresponding side and still never questioned anything. dummy...
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,131
7,817
SADL
Paint defn looks well within the realm of paint. I have seen better paint, but I wouldn't get upset over this.

Bringing up the paint with customer service when the real issue is the bearing and diagram weakens your case.

Live, learn. Pay now or pay later... hopefully not both!
never had paint issue with a root beer frame.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
88,748
26,966
media blackout
I'm not concerned about the paint. That was a given and the whole point of taking the bike apart in the first place (which shouldn't even be needed). I'm concerned that the frame is now damaged and unsafe to ride after trying to pull the bearings out. The issue is that their exploded diagram shows nothing about bearings going in from both sides. It shows them going in from one side. If I had known it was from both sides I would have used the correct tool to pull them. The paint is just the trigger for the whole situation and no help with paint codes, touch up, etc. The suggestion to use a professional mechanic for a mail order bike is also pretty insulting
Exploded diagrams are not assembly/disassembly diagrams.
 

CrabJoe StretchPants

Reincarnated Crab Walking Head Spinning Bruce Dick
Nov 30, 2003
14,163
2,485
Groton, MA
sounds like you should just...raw it now. would be moar badass anyway.
This......or raw alum powdercoat. :p



I had no problem getting every bearing/linkage/pivot apart and back together with nothing but basic tools, my hydraulic press and some home-made tools. After saying that....maybe I made it easy on myself.:rofl:
 

boostindoubles

Nacho Libre
Mar 16, 2004
8,397
6,923
Yakistan
Transition had some serious issues with paint. I had a SBG Scout that would chip when you looked at it funny. But it didn't effect the ride and when I was riding it I didn't have to look at the paint chips. When I sold it the guy who bought it didn't really care either.
 

Adventurous

Starshine Bro
Mar 19, 2014
10,840
9,875
Crawlorado
WHAT DONT YOU GUYS UNDERSTAND?! THIS IS A STRUCTURAL CONCERN CAUSE HE INCORRECTLY TRIED TO REMOVE THE BEARINGS, NOT A PAINT ISSUE LIKE 98% OF THE EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESSED?!
 

rokcore

Chimp
Feb 17, 2021
44
5
NOT A PAINT ISSUE LIKE 98% OF THE EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESSED?!
Poor reading comprehension dude.


And yes the diagram makes it perfectly clear.../s
Capture+_2021-02-17-20-47-44.png


Don't know what backwards world you all live in where exploded diagrams aren't used for removing/putting parts back together. Pick up a car maintenance manual and tell me that with a straight face. There's two ways to remove bearings; pressing and pulling. The diagram shows the seat stays can be done by pressing. The two double bearings for the chain stay pivot would have also been pulled out from either side based on the genius suggestions above; those were both pushed out from the same side they are indicated as going in shown in the diagram. If you all are satisfied with subpar quality that's fine. This is for people who expect more and want to hold manufacturers accountable for poor quality, poor service, and poor documents.
 

rokcore

Chimp
Feb 17, 2021
44
5
If they can't paint a bike correctly then they can just as easily powder coat since it's much easier
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,104
10,670
AK
Maybe you shouldn’t have bought a discount, mail order bike?
Exactly why I won't buy one of these. Pretty sure they are catalog-bikes too. Not that I wouldn't buy a catalog bike, that's essentially what my #1 fatbike is, but I'll buy it directly from the company for the cost, not what someone like YT is marking it up to, since the quality and design is generally nowhere near a quality company.
 

boostindoubles

Nacho Libre
Mar 16, 2004
8,397
6,923
Yakistan
Step 1. Pull out all yer teeth
Step 2. Get a bristle brush.
Step 3. Scratch the frame until most of the paint is gone.
Step 4. Go to hardware store and steal rattle can of choice
Step 5. Huff rattle can
Step 6. Pawn your frame for more rattle cans
 

CrabJoe StretchPants

Reincarnated Crab Walking Head Spinning Bruce Dick
Nov 30, 2003
14,163
2,485
Groton, MA
In new guys defense, as a mech eng/designer, the dashed explode lines *do* indicate assembly order/orientation by all standards. So that is a valid complaint, given they did it the right way elsewhere in the exploded view. I've designed, detailed and built dozens if not hundreds of assemblies with exploded views just like that, and all explode lines go in order from component to component the way they are assembled; that's pretty much the point of them. The paths can get cumbersome and croweded pretty quick depending on the assembly in question, but always manageable. Translate a part/parts in X/Y/Z, jog explode lines, etc. It can always be done right.

In the exploded view/lines in question, it makes it look like all bearings/spacers insert into the CS/SS pivot from the outside. This isn't the case; theres a step on the side of the bore that seperates the 2 bearings, so one must be pressed in from the outside, one from the inside.

On the other hand, I used common sense and minimal caution to know pretty quickly the bearings are pressed in from both sides of the stays. So there's that.

Done right:
1613626650629.png
 
Last edited:

rokcore

Chimp
Feb 17, 2021
44
5
The problem is this diagram shows
Bearing -> Bearing -> Seatstay
which means to remove you push right to left



It should be
Bearing -> Seatstay <- Bearing
On the other hand, I used common sense and minimal caution to know pretty quickly the bearings are pressed in from both sides of the stays. So there's that.
In new guys defense, as a mech eng/designer, the dashed explode lines *do* indicate assembly order/orientation by all standards. So that is a valid complaint, given they did it the right way elsewhere in the exploded view. I've designed and build dozens if not hundred of assemblies with exploded views just like that, and all explode lines go in order from component to component; that's pretty much the point of them. The paths can get cumbersome and croweded pretty quick depending on the assembly in question, but always manageable. Translate a part/parts in X/Y/Z, jog explode lines, etc. It can always be done right.

On the other hand, I used common sense and minimal caution to know pretty quickly the bearings are pressed in from both sides of the stays. So there's that.

Done right:
View attachment 156716
This is exactly the kind of diagram I expect and I know CAD programs can do this automatically. And if I'm honest I work with objects slightly more durable so my perception of too much force is relative