Haven’t used one- but the price look’s right.
I was saying i am considering picking up a byb system, so i can quantify things I like, especially on some of my bikes which i setup with less sag, more progressive spring rates and hard hsc.
I’m not sure i would take algorithmically derived recommendations seriously unless you have a bigger sample pool?
My vision is that I could collect lots of sample data, pretty quickly, by logging stuff for local kids.
Hey everyone, I saw this video with Henry from PB starting to test bikes with data acquisition tools. We see them on almost every pro World Cup team now also. https://youtu.be/FZyhk7ADcl4 data talk starts around 12min.
I used it for some time, 4 or 5 rides with multiple sessions/runs. At which end does the byb want you to do the noted things? The recommendations always had balance between front and rear as the first and main goal which was my main reason to run it after all. Faster rebound in the rear was the solution for me and my Storia.
Pinkbike had an article on using it a while back. From what I recall, he ended up with a kind of strange setup also: rebound & LSC basically wide open, HSC fully closed.
I've used the Motion Instruments system, and while it doesn't make specific recommendations, I did end up with a lot more conventional setup. Balanced dynamic sag front/rear (about 30-32% dynamic sag), and faster rebound than the suspension companies suggest.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.