Quantcast

candidate pool

Discussion in 'Politics & World News' started by LordOpie, Feb 1, 2008.

?

Pool poll...

  1. Both parties are fielding better candidates

    5 vote(s)
    33.3%
  2. Both parties are actually worse than, say, 2004 or another recent period

    4 vote(s)
    26.7%
  3. Dems only are fielding better candidates

    4 vote(s)
    26.7%
  4. Repubs only are fielding better candidates

    2 vote(s)
    13.3%
  1. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    (Sorry, third parties and Indies, I'm just talking about the two main parties...)

    Some idiot in another forum posted...
    To me, that's one of the most ignorant statements ever, but who knows, maybe you agree?
     
    #1 -   Feb 1, 2008

    Please register to disable this ad.

  2. N8 v2.0

    N8 v2.0 Not the sharpest tool in the shed

    Rep/Likes:
    18 / 149
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    11,008
    Location:
    The Cleft of Venus
    take it to the pwn'd forum n00b
     
    #2 -   Feb 1, 2008
  3. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver

    haha, oops.


    I'd like to get opinions from the two people who voted: both parties are worse this time.
     
    #3 -   Feb 1, 2008
  4. Spero

    Spero ass rainbow

    Rep/Likes:
    2 / 0
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,072
    Location:
    Tejas
    Maybe it's because of my general lack of voting experience because I'm young or a general malaise brought on by recent years in politics, but there isn't a candidate that stands out to me. I've spent time looking into the potentials and I have a couple of ideas as to what decision I might make, but I don't see as much potential in these candidates to perform as well as decent politicians in the past have. I'm tired of hearing comparisons between so and so and Reagan or Kennedy. IMO, none of them seem to be outstanding people for the most part.

    **and, yes, I realize they're politicians.
     
    #4 -   Feb 1, 2008
  5. H8R

    H8R Cranky Pants

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 4
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    13,983
    Stop underlining everything in your goddamn posts you fvcking homo.



    (I mean that in the nicest way possible)
     
    #5 -   Feb 1, 2008
  6. H8R

    H8R Cranky Pants

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 4
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    13,983
    Welcome to every election, ever.
     
    #6 -   Feb 1, 2008
  7. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    Wait, are you saying you voted that both parties are worse than 2004?

    I understand that you're not happy, but are you saying...

    Bush > McCain or Romney ?
    Kerry > Obama or Clinton ?

    no.
     
    #7 -   Feb 1, 2008
  8. Spero

    Spero ass rainbow

    Rep/Likes:
    2 / 0
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,072
    Location:
    Tejas
    Well, I understood that well before anyone announced candidacy, but I thought that someone would, at the very least, spike an interest and give me a reason to vote for them. Instead, I find myself making a defensive decision based upon a variety of reasons (I'm not voting solely in an attempt to keep someone else out of office) and that leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
     
    #8 -   Feb 1, 2008
  9. H8R

    H8R Cranky Pants

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 4
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    13,983
    Welcome to every election, ever.

    :D
     
    #9 -   Feb 1, 2008
  10. Spero

    Spero ass rainbow

    Rep/Likes:
    2 / 0
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,072
    Location:
    Tejas


    The poll said 2004 or another period. 2004 was worse, IMO. Possibly my political histories are incorrect or I just have a lack of education on the subject, but it has been douche or turd sandwich to the extreme for a while now.
     
  11. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    Answer question above please :)

    As for voting, this is a perfect year to vote third-party/independent. So vote FOR whomever you want.

    Underlined for H8R.
     
  12. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    Ah, I asked the question wrong then :)

    I was asking if this is the worst pool EVER. Frankly, I can't see how anyone thinks 2004 is better than this time around.
     
  13. jimmydean

    jimmydean The Official Meat of Ridemonkey

    Rep/Likes:
    175 / 1,551
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2001
    Messages:
    29,112
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    As stated in the "other" forum, I like McCain if he were 15 years younger.

    I don't like Mitt at all. Clinton isn't bad, but to be honest, I think we as a nation lose credibility with a woman leader in the Middle East and we are having a hard enough time as it is.

    I think Obama would be the best choice overall, but clearly "anything but Bush" is a top priority. As much as I don't like Mitt, I have a feeling he can't do worse than W.
     
  14. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    Aren't women in power repected there?

    I always thought that the Queen, Margaret Thatcher, Condi Rice, Madeline Albright and similar commanded a great deal of respect and got done any job in foreign diplomacy/policy as well as anyone could've?
     
  15. jimmydean

    jimmydean The Official Meat of Ridemonkey

    Rep/Likes:
    175 / 1,551
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2001
    Messages:
    29,112
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Overall I agree, but I think as bad a public image that we have now would only be worsened.

    I see Bin Laden rolling his eyes and saying "Look, look, now they've elected a woman! Hahaha".

    I could be wrong.