as far as i know the db coil uses the same 15mm eyelet fox and rs use and i see no reason why the air version would be different.What about compatibility with Giant's co-pivot?
Nope. Recent versions of the coil had a slightly larger OD bore in the shock body to accommodate the spherical bearings if used. If not used, a sleeve is inserted into the bore into which a standard 15mm OD bushing is pressed. It works fine until you have to change the bushing, but removing the old bushing usually pulls out the sleeve, which then has to be replaced also.as far as i know the db coil uses the same 15mm eyelet fox and rs use and i see no reason why the air version would be different.
how do they prevent the sleeve from spinning in the eyelet or the DU from spinning in the sleeve?Nope. Recent versions of the coil had a slightly larger OD bore in the shock body to accommodate the spherical bearings if used. If not used, a sleeve is inserted into the bore into which a standard 15mm OD bushing is pressed. It works fine until you have to change the bushing, but removing the old bushing usually pulls out the sleeve, which then has to be replaced also.
It's a press fit just like the bushing into the shock eye would be in any other shock.how do they prevent the sleeve from spinning in the eyelet or the DU from spinning in the sleeve?
no, but his bottom bracket un-threads every time he back-pedalsDo the outer races of your headset bearings spin in the cups, or the cups in the frame?
have you ridden the same frame and and same shock back to back with and without spherical bearings? i have. there is absolutely zero real world difference, on trail, in my experience. ymmv.By "stupid ones", I assume you mean the spherical bearings, which are a good thing for performance, as they remove the typical over-constrained situation of shock mounts. over-constrained shock mounts create extra friction and wear in the shock.
no but i wouldn't think a headset would see nearly the amount of rotational force applied to it as many suspension rocker/link/shock interfaces do.It's a press fit just like the bushing into the shock eye would be in any other shock.
Do the outer races of your headset bearings spin in the cups, or the cups in the frame?
It's called torque.no but i wouldn't think a headset would see nearly the amount of rotational force applied to it as many suspension rocker/link/shock interfaces do.
it will be for sure more just the fact of r&dI thought the price was already set at ccdb coil price.
time to get a tracerit doesn't look like this would fit my specialized sx
So they came up with the coil version with no R&D?it will be for sure more just the fact of r&d
TT is way too long for my liking, among other things.time to get a tracer
Oh sorry, my faultI've already posted it, even with translation ;>
http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/f19/cane-creek-double-barrel-air-241254/index5/#post3671119
It happens I hope real life reviews will appear soon.Oh sorry, my fault
OEM's are shipping now and customer's shocks are shipping on the 15th still.When is the CCDB Air going to be available?
He definitely says that, plain as day.............and then lists features that are desirable for ANY bike, especially DH bikes.if I understood well, author says it's rather a shock for big AM on EN bikes...
2.25" OD of the air spring chamber; it looks huge, but really isn't much bigger in diameter than a coil spring. My CCDB with steel 400 lb/in spring is 2.12" OD....do me a solid and measure the big chamber outside diameter. Thanks!
Awsome man. Thanks!2.25" OD of the air spring chamber; it looks huge, but really isn't much bigger in diameter than a coil spring. My CCDB with steel 400 lb/in spring is 2.12" OD.
As far as application, I've talked to CC about it, they said the whole purpose of the air spring was to work better with different frame leverage rates; not necessarily a certain type of bike. I interpret that as being designed for frames that don't have a progressive leverage rate, basically.
That's a load of bs. Yes bikes designed around air shocks will have different leverage curves but there are many full on dh rigs that are linear to slightly degressive. Sunday, Legend, 224 and probably quite a few others. It's just the CC guys claim it's not to loose weight but to offer a progressive CCDB for the people who couldn't run the spring version (or didn't want to) because of the linear nature of that shock.I don't think it has already been posted... Good review of DBair, however, if I understood well, author says it's rather a shock for big AM on EN bikes...
http://www.bikemag.com/gear/initial-thoughts-cane-creek-dbair/
With the volume manipulation of the main chamber, I'm tempted to try them on every bike I ownNo problem.
I'm really tempted to replace the Pushed RP23 on my trail bike with a DB Air.
So Norbar, when are you getting yours?That's a load of bs. Yes bikes designed around air shocks will have different leverage curves but there are many full on dh rigs that are linear to slightly degressive. Sunday, Legend, 224 and probably quite a few others. It's just the CC guys claim it's not to loose weight but to offer a progressive CCDB for the people who couldn't run the spring version (or didn't want to) because of the linear nature of that shock.
I'm really thinking about it but I'm so happy with my current build I don't feel the urge to spend so probably only if I get a bigger influx of cash.So Norbar, when are you getting yours?