Drove the VW Atlas home This guy wants to sell me a Atlas really bad. I am suspect.There was a second gen on a trailer the other night, I am guessing you can import an 89-94 under the same laws they are importing the Skyline.
Only because the 2017 4Runner is so awesome....Drove the VW Atlas home This guy wants to sell me a Atlas really bad. I am suspect.
Toyota rolled out full-speed dynamic cruise on the 2016 Prius, iirc. Now that I delve into their site a bit more it looks like the full-speed variant (aka stop and go or how you describe it) is still only on the Prius, Prius Prime, Camry, and C-HR. The non-full speed version still seems to be on the Highlander, RAV4, Sienna, and Avalon. Lame.I rented Toyota one a few days ago, had to be at least a '17 since rental companies never keep stock more than about a year, it had the ACC, but it was a watered down version of what I was used to. My parents got the subie less than 2 years ago too, similar thing, at zero it kicks off (and the car starts rolling forward under it's own power, surprising if you were expecting it to stop). With the subie though the lane-keeping is more aggressive and tends to work better, but that's not a feature I'd have or use (my BMW didn't have it anyway).
No.Have you considered one of these sexy little bitches?
While I get what you are saying, and appreciate it as well, I spend 2 hours a day in my car. One hour a day, twice a day, I'm in this thing. I am rarely on any of my six bikes these days. With the new job, I will only spend ~1 hour a day in that car. I will still ride my bikes as rarely as I do now, until my son is old enough to not require constant attention.I'm having trouble getting on top of this discussion. You need a tin box with four doors and four wheels, two of which provide directional control, and which is going to succumb to rust in roughly a decade. You're going to drive on paths filled with fools in similar tin boxes who will impede your journey, and some of whom will turn on flashy lights and charge you money if you drive with any joy.
Fuck the bling, get the minimal vehicle which will get you from point a to b and back, and spend the rest on bikes.
Sounds like you need a fully-autonomous car.<snip>
SO, I would rather spend a little more on a car that makes that commute less painless
And THIS is how I ended up buying a second Corvette (because the first was no longer an option) . I didn't spend a little more, it was a little less actually than a lot of good used cars. While it isn't the most practical for a lot of things, one thing it does well is take my solo ass to work and home again. The drive home via Skyline/Rocky Point takes a few minutes longer, but the payoff is worth it. It also fits enough gear for a week long getaway with the wife and pooch when the drive won't suck.SO, I would rather spend a little more on a car that makes that commute less painless, or even enjoyable, and certainly safer or more efficient. I don't need a car to impress my neighbors, but having something that I get to enjoy every single day will be remarkably valuable. Think of the things you use every day, doesn't it make sense to like using them?
So an early Gen2 would qualify. I think production started in 1988 or 1989, I need to look into this more.Has to be 25 years old.
was thinking about a gen 1 CTS-V. Six speed, lots of HP, hopefully dumb american pushrod maintenance...I won't bore you with the lack of issues I've had or the minimal maintenance it has required over 4 years and 80k miles I've had it.
wagonwas thinking about a gen 1 CTS-V. Six speed, lots of HP, hopefully dumb american pushrod maintenance...
Get the wagon, GET THE WAGON!was thinking about a gen 1 CTS-V. Six speed, lots of HP, hopefully dumb american pushrod maintenance...
https://jalopnik.com/toyota-will-sell-you-a-2018-camry-with-over-300-hp-1796293616I do not need 400hp, and I certainly don't need over 500, as much fun as that would be. I wouldn't call 400hp crappy, but perhaps I would agree that the interior is inferior and the car had a shitty differential and transmission.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2018-bmw-m5-test-reviewRemember the days when 400hp was crazy? hah
Most SUVs are now faster than the majority of 90's sports cars.
see anything that dodge makes (looking at you hellcat)Weight matters. Heavy cars with eleventy billionty HP suck.
Way easier to change the clutch, just get the pinion brace if it doesn't already have one. My buddy bought his 3rd wife one, 2005, same year as his Vette. I loved it, that car was amazing. Not nearly the balance of the Vette, but holy hell it has plenty of power and not a slouch in the twisties by any means.was thinking about a gen 1 CTS-V. Six speed, lots of HP, hopefully dumb american pushrod maintenance...
Shocked monkey is shocked.A friend I met up with in LA last weekend rented a Camaro. He was supposed to get an SS but the only one they had stunk like weed. They ended up giving him an RS convertible. Holy hell what a disappointment. Even with the V6 is was pretty quick, more that fast enough for LA traffic. However it failed in every other category. For a large and heavy car the interior was cramped and tiny. My friend is skinny and of average height and his shins hit the dashboard. luckily his wife is 95 lbs and as flexible as gumby, otherwise the back seat is uninhabitable. It clearly weighed as much as garbage barge. The control buttons had a similar tactile pleasure as stepping on a cat turd in bare feet and the panel gaps were terrible. The transmission took seconds to respond to the flappy paddle shifters.
The exhaust did have a nice note but at idle the engine sounded more like $1.37 in change in a dryer. Both of us were hoping it was a fun car, it kind of was but only for mashing the pedal to the floor, was rather terrible in every other way. I was expecting a lot more from a modern GM product.
and then?his wife is 95 lbs and as flexible as gumby,
the camaro is pretty much the vehicular equivalent of butt rockShocked monkey is shocked.
I’m 5’11” and have no problems, he didn’t jack the seats all the way up first did he? The gen 6 is definitely a smaller car than the gen 5, but you can put the seats way back and low. If you are making the same driving position as your minivan, yes it’s going to fail. And yes, the back seats are even more useless than before.A friend I met up with in LA last weekend rented a Camaro. He was supposed to get an SS but the only one they had stunk like weed. They ended up giving him an RS convertible. Holy hell what a disappointment. Even with the V6 is was pretty quick, more that fast enough for LA traffic. However it failed in every other category. For a large and heavy car the interior was cramped and tiny. My friend is skinny and of average height and his shins hit the dashboard. luckily his wife is 95 lbs and as flexible as gumby, otherwise the back seat is uninhabitable. It clearly weighed as much as garbage barge. The control buttons had a similar tactile pleasure as stepping on a cat turd in bare feet and the panel gaps were terrible. The transmission took seconds to respond to the flappy paddle shifters.
The exhaust did have a nice note but at idle the engine sounded more like $1.37 in change in a dryer. Both of us were hoping it was a fun car, it kind of was but only for mashing the pedal to the floor, was rather terrible in every other way. I was expecting a lot more from a modern GM product.
Au contraire, it annoys me when I see people driving down the road who can barely see over the top of the wheel. Those who have learned to use the seat height adjustment deserve plaudits.It always annoys me when I get in our fleet vehicles at work and every single time (SUVs) the seat is jacked up as high as it can go
Short people?Au contraire, it annoys me when I see people driving down the road who can barely see over the top of the wheel. Those who have learned to use the seat height adjustment deserve plaudits.
I’m 5’11” and have no problems, he didn’t jack the seats all the way up first did he? The gen 6 is definitely a smaller car than the gen 5, but you can put the seats way back and low. If you are making the same driving position as your minivan, yes it’s going to fail. And yes, the back seats are even more useless than before.
It always annoys me when I get in our fleet vehicles at work and every single time (SUVs) the seat is jacked up as high as it can go and the side mirrors are adjusted do you can see the rear or the vehicle, which is dangerous as hell.
I too rented a low end one a few months ago, the interior is nothing like my 2SS 1LE and the driving experience is sublime. Just watch randy probst bust out laughing while driving the thing, that was a lot of what did it for me.
I’d like to drive the V6 1LE, but otherwise I have no interest in the V6, this 2SS 1LE has an interior every bit as good as my 4 series, better actually when you consider the ventilated seats and interior trim lights.
She is 29, works as a middle school teacher and looks like a student.whoa whoa whoa, we can only make fun of panel gaps when discussing teslas.
and then?
Convertible? Well there's your problem right there. There are a few convertible sports cars that are worth it, this is not one, you generally don't get a convertible for performance. That and the auto transmission.Seat was all the way down because the windshield was so low on the convertible that the wind would blast you in the face.
When I sat in the rear seat the top of the windshield was in line with my neck.
I would hope that the hardtop was a lot more functional.