Yeah its better when politicians want legal torture for "terrorist" children in gitmo and bomb children in Iraq for freedom/oil insteadN8 said:Why democrats sound stupid when being outraged about Foley:
leave it to you to classify terrorists as 'children' and listening to Brittney Spears as 'torture'...Yeah its better when politicians want legal torture for "terrorist" children in gitmo and bomb children in Iraq for freedom/oil instead
I think its a very good point. The reality is that its very much sickening when both sides try to preach from some moral high ground.why N8 sounds stupid when typing a post on RM:
What the f' does that have to do with what he said?sysdasti said:Yeah its better when politicians want legal torture for "terrorist" children in gitmo and bomb children in Iraq for freedom/oil instead
Also reprehensible. Clean them all out.Why democrats sound stupid when being outraged about Foley:
Oh hell no... he needs some jail time, without presidential pardoning.Also reprehensible. Clean them all out.
Or are you implying that what Foley did was okay?
Depends if you want the Republicans to stay in control or not. This is just the sort of thing that will make lots of conservatives to simply stay at home.Seriously, can you guys even try and have an election campaign without filling it with irrelevant BS?
Why are they at home? Molesting young boys, perhaps?Depends if you want the Republicans to stay in control or not. This is just the sort of thing that will make lots of conservatives to simply stay at home.
I don't understand. Why are you condoning pedophilia?Oh hell no... he needs some jail time, without presidential pardoning.
Since you put it like that...Depends if you want the Republicans to stay in control or not. This is just the sort of thing that will make lots of conservatives to simply stay at home.
Maybe you should try reading the article, it helps$tinkle said:is this still a scandal?
On that Web page, he identified himself as being 21 years old and said he had been attending college at the University of California, Berkeley. He also identified himself as a House page from September 2001 to June 2002. He would have been 16 and 17 then. He said he was going to Oklahoma to be deputy campaign manager for Istook’s gubernatorial effort, according to the Web site.
No one would show up to vote on real issues let alone understand what they were voting for, they would have to hand out Larry The Cable guy DVD's to get people to show up.Seriously, can you guys even try and have an election campaign without filling it with irrelevant BS?
and when did these "transmissions" (for lack of better word) take place?syadasti said:Maybe you should try reading the article, it helps
and from another linked article in this thread:WASHINGTON (AP) -- Rep. Mark Foley, R-Florida, resigned from Congress on Friday, effective immediately, in the wake of questions about e-mails he wrote a former male page.
Campaign aides had previously acknowledged that the Republican congressman e-mailed the former Capitol page five times, but had said there was nothing inappropriate about the exchange. The page was 16 at the time of the e-mail correspondence.
The correspondence took place in August 2005 after the boy gave Foley a handwritten thank you note before returning to Louisiana.
so you see, there is indeed some confusion. is there another/different page?House Speaker Dennis Hastert Monday denied that anyone in the GOP leadership knew about sexually explicit instant messages Foley allegedly exchanged with former male pages in 2003.
Obviously, the rip in the space time continuum wasn't televised.and when did these "transmissions" (for lack of better word) take place?
from the first linked article in this here thread:and from another linked article in this threado you see, there is indeed some confusion. is there another/different page?
The quote you pasted does indeed say page(s)$tinkle said:from the first linked article in this here thread:and from another linked article in this threado you see, there is indeed some confusion. is there another/different page?
House Speaker Dennis Hastert Monday denied that anyone in the GOP leadership knew about sexually explicit instant messages Foley allegedly exchanged with former male pages in 2003.
when you start quoting hastert, you're desperate.The quote you pasted does indeed say page(s)
Yes, many in fact. I already linked to a WaPo on this. See here.so you see, there is indeed some confusion. is there another/different page?
not what i meant.Yes, many in fact. I already linked to a WaPo on this. See here.
I saw some of that information on the timeline on Monday or Sunday, forget which TV show.$tinkle said:the nytimes has a timeline that isn't that helpful.
I don't know the exact number, but it is certainly plural.not what i meant.
what i meant was "with how many pages did foley have sexually explicit email/IMs".
it seems there are 2: a lad from the bijou (this one 16 and a former page at the time) & one from oklahoma (18 and a former page at the time).
either way, dude's gotta go.
oh, npr timeline
according to the oklahoman, the page with whom foley was IM-ing has been named , and is currently 21 years old.
2006
-2003
-------
3
so:
21
- 3
---
18
is this still a scandal?
Did I miss the red challenge flag??? Damn....Upon further review: 16-17 isnt exactly pedophilia, is it?
No, there's another name for it, but I can't remember what it is right now.Upon further review: 16-17 isnt exactly pedophilia, is it?
http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2302953&postcount=23No, there's another name for it, but I can't remember what it is right now.
It'll probably get so off track that it will end up back at some silly land deal in Arkansas involving Foley's third cousin.Oh goodie... there is now going to be a probe into the whole affair. I sure hope they get to the bottom of the thing and finger the perpetrators.
Foley is a priest abused alcoholic gay, but it was all a page joke otherwise, right :biggrin:so mark foley is the victim?
beautiful.
And I'm sure all the pages that have come forward (who worked for both parties) are democratic operatives. Nice one.Looks like this is spot on:
Hastert: 'The people who want to see this thing blow up are ABC News and a lot of Democratic operatives, people funded by George Soros'...