Monoclonal antibodies have a small benefit for outpatients... yet they're an expensive IV infusion. Not convenient, not cheap, marginally effective.What’s with stories about wealthy folks going to the hospital to get trump-level treatment for infections? I’ve seen/heard a few (Joe Rogan and Penn of Penn & Teller) mention getting antibiotics and monoclonal antibodies, along with human sized doses of ivermectin.
1. I don’t know anything about monoclonal a antibodies. What’s the expected benefit?
2. Why antibiotics for a viral infection?
3. From a the NIH article I posted a few pages back, it sounded like there was no in vivo benefit of ivermectin identified, particularly at human level doses.
Without dismissing them as idiots, is there any good argument for any of those treatments? Or is just part of the “kitchen sink” they throw at you when you can afford the premium?
What's better yet are polyclonal antibodies, such as those made in response to getting a vaccination in your deltoid.
No evidence for azithromycin, ivermectin, or HCQ.
(There is evidence supporting dexamethasone if you get sick enough to be admitted, though. That's a cheap, generic drug whose promoted use after trials showed its efficacy goes totally against the "but Big Pharma!" narrative. And again, see vaccine prices << Regeneron prices.)