That's a very far cry from "2 stops faster", not to mention any cheaper. Not to mention both of the above mentioned lenses cannot hold a candle in either focus speed, contrast/color or durability of the 70-200 2.8.
troll? the 85 f/1.8 focuses faster than my 70-200 and i've had it longer...durability has been fine. i've heard of CA issues w/ that lens but to be honest i've never once had to correct for any purple fringing in any of my photos...maybe i am not that sensitive to it.
troll? the 85 f/1.8 focuses faster than my 70-200 and i've had it longer...durability has been fine. i've heard of CA issues w/ that lens but to be honest i've never once had to correct for any purple fringing in any of my photos...maybe i am not that sensitive to it.
That wasn't in response to you. Clearly pointing out the futility in a statement like "2 stops faster" and cheaper. To get even remotely close to that statement, in speed alone, to cover the range of the 70-200 is ludicrously expensive - and even then not 2 stops faster.
85 1.8 isn't weather sealed nor built like a tank like the 70-200 or 85 1.2. The 1.2 by the way is ridiculously good in terms of well, everything. It focuses almost instantaneously on a 1 series body. I'd say it's up there with the 300 2.8, which is easily the best lens canon makes.
I'm sure the 1.8 works great, that wasn't the point though.
Also, get your 70-200 in for service. The 2 I've owned both focused lightning fast, although the IS one wasn't anywhere NEAR as sharp as the non IS one I currently have, or any 85mm I have played with, that's for sure.
Let me clarify: I'm still looking for a Tokina 50-135 f/2.8 that isn't over-priced and shipping from half way around the world. I have a Tokina 11-16mm to trade.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.