Good read.
As a skeptic and an artist......this was right up my alley. Dan Brown sure did some homework.
As a skeptic and an artist......this was right up my alley. Dan Brown sure did some homework.
I loved it and plowed right through it.TreeSaw said:Sweet I just bought the book yesterday and can't wait to settle down with some hot tea and read it!!!
Murder/conspiracy mystery with sub plots of Catholic/papal smear campaigns and history modification all in the search of the Holy Grail.Knuckleslammer said:Ok, now that you all love it, what is it about?
Knuck
That I believe (I've studied it) and how the Church erased all things Hebrew from 300 AD and after due to Constantine. IMO, when Christianity took a HUGE wrong turn............... :angry:Yossarian said:....................Catholic/papal smear campaigns and history modification..............
Read the book........... it's an interesting read.Andyman_1970 said:<snip> I hope this book is fiction and not asserting any historical significance that there really does exist a Holy Grail.
Ppppppppppppppuuuuuuulllllllleeeeeeeeaaaaaassssssssssseeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!
(and no I have not read the book)
Andyman_1970 said:Holy Grail...........like the cup Jesus drank from at the Last Supper..........you have got to be kidding me. I hope this book is fiction and not asserting any historical significance that there really does exist a Holy Grail.
Ppppppppppppppuuuuuuulllllllleeeeeeeeaaaaaassssssssssseeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!
(and no I have not read the book)
Holy Blood, Holy Grail published years before the Brown book, proposes that the holy grail was not an actual cup, in this case one that caught blood from the wound in Christ's side as many believe it to be, but instead a very well protected secret. The secret? That Christ had a child by Mary Magdelaine and that his bloodline continued through the Merovingian (sp?) line and continues to this day.Andyman_1970 said:Holy Grail...........like the cup Jesus drank from at the Last Supper..........you have got to be kidding me. I hope this book is fiction and not asserting any historical significance that there really does exist a Holy Grail.
There is no Holy Grail, regardless of what the Catholic church or any church says.SkaredShtles said:Read the book........... it's an interesting read.
-S.S.-
Holy crap! No one said it was a lost book of the New Testament. It's an interesting read, that's all, nothing more.Andyman_1970 said:There is no Holy Grail, regardless of what the Catholic church or any church says...
Again this is a classic "Westernizing", "Catholicizing" and "Monday Morning QB'ing" the event that took place. These followers of Jesus were so scared of being arrested they denyed Him, they ran, and they went back to their old jobs (which is significant). See in the 1st century as a disciple of a rabbi (which the 12 disciples were) your WHOLE life was devoted to being around your rabbi so that you could learn from your rabbi, not just what he knows but the whole intent of disciples was that you would follow this rabbi so that you would become like him. So if the disciples go back to their old jobs, they don't think they can be like their rabbi anymore, the thinking is "evidently this gig is done". Only after Jesus comes back to they understand the "gig" is not over.BikeGeek said:Holy Blood, Holy Grail published years before the Brown book, proposes that the holy grail was not an actual cup, in this case one that caught blood from the wound in Christ's side as many believe it to be, but instead a very well protected secret.
NOT! And when did this story surface, what year?BikeGeek said:The secret? That Christ had a child by Mary Magdelaine and that his bloodline continued through the Merovingian (sp?) line and continues to this day.
BikeGeek said:Holy crap! No one said it was a lost book of the New Testament. It's an interesting read, that's all, nothing more.
African or European?DVNT said:What is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
African or European?DVNT said:What is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
Andyman_1970 said:LOL...........sorry let me take a deep breath..................
Ok much better. I hear people all the time talking about that book like it is some new revelation or something............so I get a little cranked up about it.
Anyway, sorry for the rants.......................
deception point was very blah. deserves a spot on the safeway checkout rack. as i did last time this book was discussed, i recommend umberto eco's "name of the rose" as a similar type of book with much more "meat" to it.aussiedude said:Has anyone read any of Dan Brown's other books?
DaVinci was a great artist and scientist, but a Biblical historian he is not.........with any accuracy that is.Greyhound said:the author points out that, in nowhere in DaVinci's "Last Supper" do you see the cup of christ.
Toshi,Toshi said:deception point was very blah. deserves a spot on the safeway checkout rack. as i did last time this book was discussed, i recommend umberto eco's "name of the rose" as a similar type of book with much more "meat" to it.
i agree, the book is a page turner, but it's in a very straight-to-tv-movie kind of way. doesn't make you think.Snacks said:Toshi,
I just started reading DC and I can't stop. What do you mean by "Name of the Rose" having more 'meat' to it? The story is deeper?
Thanks, Snacks.
Hey thanks I'll go out and get that one when I'm finished with this one, sounds real interesting.Toshi said:i agree, the book is a page turner, but it's in a very straight-to-tv-movie kind of way. doesn't make you think.
name of the rose is a whole different ballgame. it's very dense, filled with things that (hopefully) should make you run to the computer so that you can google them to figure out what eco is talking about , and its world and characters are significantly more complex.
cool. here are some more books that i highly recommend:Snacks said:Hey thanks I'll go out and get that one when I'm finished with this one, sounds real interesting.
I read too much :
W. Somerset Maugham, "The Razor's Edge"
Tom Wolfe, "A Man In Full"
Alfred Bester, "The Demolished Man"
Peter Matthiessen, "At Play in the Fields of the Lord"
Neil Gaimon, "Neverwhere"
Neal Stephenson, "Snow Crash"
Umberto Eco, "Foucalt's Pendulum"
Philip K. Dick, "A Scanner Darkly"
William Gibson, "Neuromancer"
Salman Rushdie, "Fury"
The Bible is a historic document. As far as historic documents go the gospels of the NT are considered extremely reliable sources. If you want to discredit the books of the NT as fiction then you should also be ready to ignore most of the textual history we have on the ancient world. The fact is that the books considered authentic were written between 20 and 80 years(most would say 50, but some still argue this) after the death of Jesus(who is a historic figure mentioned by several very well respected ancient Roman and Jewish historians). The fact that a peasant man from Isreal is mentioned in official Roman documents nearly 150 years after his death should tell you that he was a man of some significance. In the documented debates between Jews and the early Christians there is not one person who tries to claim that Jesus's tomb wasn't empty, the only dispute is how it became empty. I'll leave my argument at this, the majority of the books in the NT are of historical importance and are accepted by most authorities on the subject as free from addition of legends and exagerations.Dingus McGee said:They call the Bible the 'greatest story ever told'
Da Vinci code is pretty good too...
both are decent fiction, IMHO.