death penalty for child rapists
- Thread starter LordOpie
- Start date
Maybe b/c children have a tendancy to lie once in a while??
I'm against execution by the state for any reason b/c any system created by man is not perfect. But how could any state justify this law before DNA evidence?? People in this country love to kill people, just hope you never get caught "in the system".
Now if someone raped my kid, I'd kill 'em. But I don't represent an entire civilized society.
I'm against execution by the state for any reason b/c any system created by man is not perfect. But how could any state justify this law before DNA evidence?? People in this country love to kill people, just hope you never get caught "in the system".
Now if someone raped my kid, I'd kill 'em. But I don't represent an entire civilized society.
The punishment is a seperate issue from the conviction. Regardless of whether it's a slap on the wrist or death penalty, they shouldn't convict someone if the evidence is lacking.
I agree with you that the death penalty is wrong, but you must agree that raping a child is as bad as any other crime that yields the death penalty, yeah?
They should suffer a worse punishment than a ped. Anyone in a position of trust should be tortured.
Any reason why you won't answer the question?
Cool so now when an 18 year old sleeps with their 16 year old GF they can be killed?
Jesus christ, you people lose all creativity once you have some friggin crotch fruit.
Death penalty is stupid. Thrown naked into a pile of peanuts in an elephant cage during mating season however.......
Death penalty is stupid. Thrown naked into a pile of peanuts in an elephant cage during mating season however.......
You have an untenable philosophical position there Opie...unless you think that being raped is worse than being murdered? How'd you square that circle?
Eh, I'm a geometric anomaly.
Yes, because the court system never ever considers such things. They are always B&W in their decisions and every crime gets exactly the same punishment.
In theory circumstances are considered but in reality it does not always happen because of several reasons including politics. What is worse punishing the possibly innocent, in this point death, or not punishing the guilty enough?
In the end this is all about vengeance and not prevention or proper punishment. The practice in this country would be to spend millions to put a rapist to death but we probably wouldn't drop a dime to help the victim.
Wow, is no one bothering to read my repeated, "I'm against the death penalty" statement?
I didn't answer the question b/c I haven't thought enough about it to take a position on it- i have to be at work, but I don't have to overwork my mind
I don't believe in execution by the state, so I'm taking a position on a hypothetical that I don't believe in. So "but you must agree that raping a child is as bad as any other crime that yields the death penalty, yeah?" Is it as bad as killing a child?? Is it as bad as pimping out a child?? Is it as bad a child pornographers?? These are also crimes that rank high or higher in my opinion. So do I agree that raping a child is as bad as killing them?? Probably not as bad as killing them all things being equal. Counter point?
No.Raping a child is creative?
Defaulting to the death penalty as a cure all is LACK OF CREATIVITY.
Get some sleep man.
Please point out where I advocate the death penalty or stfu.No.
Defaulting to the death penalty as a cure all is LACK OF CREATIVITY.
Get some sleep man.
It's a sad day when I can't be sarcastic with the pie lord.
when my wife worked at the arapahoe co jail dude screamed he was going to kill her, and then rape her.
jokes on him...D
I'm not a huge fan of the death penalty, but when you have jails as crowded as they are, I think it's an option.
When it comes to child rape (as in under the age of 13 or some other arbitrary number = child) I say a public execution is certainly in order.
When it comes to child rape (as in under the age of 13 or some other arbitrary number = child) I say a public execution is certainly in order.
So you're okay with killing people only if it will save you money???
oh , you were being funny?It's a sad day when I can't be sarcastic with the pie lord.
fail.
unless you can rape the child in its sleep
my camp counselor was partial to pigs in a blanket. hope that helped.ohio said:
I will not read any of your posts that are longer than one sentence. I am afraid it might contain subliminal messages that will make me a slave of the Zionist conspiracy.
Fair enough...D
that makes no sense. you can't get them to shut up as it is, and when they start nattering on about global domination it's time to call the baby sitter & let them know you'll be home a few hours late...D
"Oh my, we have a lot of people in these prisons. I have an idea. Let's not build more prisons, or reserve prisons for violent offenders (keeping nonviolent offenders, such as those in for drug charges, out), let's cull the population. Let's kill these people because they cost taxpayers too much money."
Please re-read what you wrote and come back in a few minutes.
I think it should be considered as a punishment for repeat offenders, but I'm the camp that thinks life in prison is a worse punishment than death. I also don't think it will act as a deterrent.
Did anyone see that show a while back that had "sexual offenders" on it, and it was kids who had sex with each other and a parent called the police? The thing I hate is that we lump all sex crimes together, so the guy who has sex with his girlfriend thats 2 years younger has to register (for life) and be posted on the same site with the child rapist.
Did anyone see that show a while back that had "sexual offenders" on it, and it was kids who had sex with each other and a parent called the police? The thing I hate is that we lump all sex crimes together, so the guy who has sex with his girlfriend thats 2 years younger has to register (for life) and be posted on the same site with the child rapist.
I agree completely. HUGE difference between a 15 yo and an 8 yo.
In Japan you pay for that....
I say bring back the Public Stocks.
How many sex offenders have been let out due to overcrowding and re-offend? More than one, and that is too many. Had they been killed after the first offense, the second would not have happened.
If they went away and stayed away, then death might not have to be an option. But when criminals get let out early (and not for good behavior) to continue the crime spree, maybe killing them off aint so bad.
Crimes against a child are high on my list of people to kill.
1. Overcrowding should be solved by any other means than killing prisoners off. If we let anyone out, make it nonviolent offenders. There's a list a mile long of people in jail for crimes much less dangerous to the public than a sex offender.
2. Show me a single example of a child rapist let out too early specifically because the prisons are too crowded. Trust me, if they need to kick people out, they could kick a drug dealer or user out before a child rapist.
3. The issue of people let out, then commiting crimes again could be solved not by killing them just to be safe, but by better evaluating them, better rehabilitating them, etc etc. This problem sits with judges and courts, not prisons being overcrowded.
How about castrating rapists as a form of rehabilitation?
The ones who rape 12-13 year olds and under.
possession & distribution of kiddie pr0n is non-violent. now i wonder how many child rapists have kiddie pr0n? gotta keep that fire burning, y'know
I'm all for cruel and unusual death sentences for child rapists, but there would need to be some sort of requirement for overwhelming evidence of guilt, beyond what you'd need for a 'regular' conviction.