Just testing my logic.
In order for Saddam to be a threat to the security of the US and the UK he had to have the means (WMD) and the intent.
As he did not use WMD when attacked then either he had none or had no intention of using them.
So, he either had intent but no weapons or weapons but no intent. So he was no threat.
But he was an evil bastard to that's OK
In order for Saddam to be a threat to the security of the US and the UK he had to have the means (WMD) and the intent.
As he did not use WMD when attacked then either he had none or had no intention of using them.
So, he either had intent but no weapons or weapons but no intent. So he was no threat.
But he was an evil bastard to that's OK