Quantcast

developing intellectual property

hmcleay

i-track suspension
Apr 28, 2008
117
116
Adelaide, Australia
Not sure if this is the correct forum for this query, but it indirectly relates to bike parts/tech.

I have an idea for a new technology in MTB.
I feel that my idea is worthy of being patented, and am fairly certain that there are no examples of prior art.
I'm keen to get my invention patented as soon as possible, so that nobody else gets in before me.
I've researched the patent process, and visited a patent attorney to discuss the invention. So I understand that part of the process.

Before spending lots of $$ on the patent application, I feel that I need some amount of 'market feedback' to help me decide whether the invention has market potential.
But it's a bit hard to get 'market feedback' without publically revealing the invention.
The patent attorney suggested that I can approach a 'market player' with my idea (and get them to sign a confidentiality agreement) to discuss whether they feel that the invention would have market potential.
However, that option scares me a bit, as a large bike company could easily steal my idea, and I wouldn't be able to afford to sue them.
Plus, I don't have any contacts in the relevant companies.

I also haven't yet developed a prototype for this invention, as that also requires significant time and money, which would ultimately defer the patent application.

Basically, I'm asking whether to go ahead with the patent application, and then follow up with prototyping and market research (which I'll be able to do publically after the patent application date).
Or, do I hold off on the patent application (increasing the risk of someone else inventing it before me), and approach 'market players' for their feedback on whether the invention has market potential.

I would love to get some advice from people who have successfully developed an invention in the bike industry.
Maybe dw has some good advice from his personal experience?
Keep in mind that I'm one person, without corporate backing, so I probably can't afford to take the same approach that a large bike company would take.

Thanks in advance,
Hugh.
 

w00dy

In heaven there is no beer
Jun 18, 2004
3,417
52
that's why we drink it here
It's good that you're thinking of it in terms of money invested. That took me a while to come to terms with. I've had a couple ideas which I thought had merit. The truth of it is the patent is just the start. If you can't pay lawyers to back you it's a bit of a lost cause. Bicycle parts are not the most lucrative venture. My future projects will just be short run productions. Make the stuff, sell it, make a splash, and probably get ripped off. You do have a year from the point when you debut the idea publicly. You can always patent after the fact if you start making good money with sales.