We've got an epidemic of eating disorders in cycling (across the sexes), pressure to increase followers and exposure put on the athletes themselves, and some pretty questionable practices encouraged by sponsors and teams when it comes to what to share and what not to share online. Yeah, they're definitely being coached to keep those relationship statuses off the socials.I never saw that and would go as far as to say you made it up.
She was a multi time national champ and Olympian. Thank God I was bowing out of the sport just as instagram was becoming something sponsors cared about.Heather Irmiger is probably a great person. 2,500 Instagram followers isn't 350,000 followers.
Indeed. And I know who she is, as should anyone who followed the sport at that time. I was raising the somewhat facetious comparison with Emily Batty, who hasn't gained her following just from results. She's resorted to shilling for online gambling and Porsche.She was a multi time national champ and Olympian. Thank God I was bowing out of the sport just as instagram was becoming something sponsors cared about.
I could do some Porsche shilling. Online gambling not so much.Indeed. And I know who she is, as should anyone who followed the sport at that time. I was raising the somewhat facetious comparison with Emily Batty, who hasn't gained her following just from results. She's resorted to shilling for online gambling and Porsche.
Unless you're out of pocket to Porsche or online gambling because Emily Batty held a gun to your head why do you care?She's resorted to shilling for online gambling and Porsche.
Yeah, I've heard about her but she's living a comfortable life in Laguna so I guess she's happy with how that worked out. I also look down my nose a little at that sort of self promotion/exploitation but I get the impression my opinion is considered dated. I never got the impression she was coerced into going that route. More like every instagram/only fans girl she just took the obvious opportunity in front of her.Indeed. And I know who she is, as should anyone who followed the sport at that time. I was raising the somewhat facetious comparison with Emily Batty, who hasn't gained her following just from results. She's resorted to shilling for online gambling and Porsche.
Promoting online gambling is pretty crap. So I am with him on it being questionable.Unless you're out of pocket to Porsche or online gambling because Emily Batty held a gun to your head why do you care?
Bro, dudes buy bottled girl fartsWould anyone really be tempted to take up gambling because some pretty little blonde cyclist promoted it?
Sorry, everyone, who had to read my last post.
Came here to say Dean Lucas did a podcast with Loic and Finn talking about the riders union, which is interesting considering they're on one of the biggest trade teams and making a fair few dollars, and they are here looking out for the little guy, where someone like, oh I dunno, Minnaar is dismissing the whole idea like some tax-haven-living, end-of-career famous athlete.
edit: adding an apple podcast link but its on other platforms also
D&M's with DEAN
Listen to Dean Lucas's D&M's with DEAN podcast on Apple Podcasts.podcasts.apple.com
This is a Great Topic/Read. I am re-reading to take it All in before I even think about making a comment.I'm Scottish mate. We're not afraid of using swear words calmly and without malice in every day chat or being direct in our replies. Acronyms in online chat even less so.
I think this is where we need to bring more idea’s Gary/All Monkey’s. I see Both Side’s.How is not specific enough for you?
I'm not looking for a reply. Just puzzled by your reaction.
I've stated my opinion and really can't be bothered replying back and forth.
Yes. A riders union would be a good thing. But I see your idea of how riders should be paid more equally as hugely flawed. My thoughts align with @Lelandjt's on that point.
Its like that here with booze ads. "drink responsibly" Whatever that means.Its cool though as all the promotion/adds are followed by the phrase "gamble responsibly"
I think the issue is where online gambling is going in 2022 as it's getting way worse and more predatory while also some of those companies are trying to skirt around regulations and target kids too. So many shitty scammy gambling platforms popping upDifferent cultures I suppose.. But our government actively promotes gambling and the big online gambling companies sponsor a lot of big UK sport such as premiership football.. And our TV is full of online gambling adverts. And we're so used to it no one here bats an eyelid really. Its cool though as all the promotion/adds are followed by the phrase "gamble responsibly"
Yeah this should be regulated. I know Belgium has for example banned lootboxes in games. If I remember right they brand this as gambling.some mobile games are as worse, i.e. diablo immortal.
Diablo Immortal Actually Requires Over $500,000 to Max Character
While many believed that it would take almost $100,000 to max out a Diablo Immortal character, one player reveals it may take much, much more money.gamerant.com
Wouldn't know TBH.I think the issue is where online gambling is going in 2022 as it's getting way worse and more predatory while also some of those companies are trying to skirt around regulations and target kids too. So many shitty scammy gambling platforms popping up
Hey I've been asked for my ID when buying beer like a month ago so I can still fool some people.Microtransactions is just how games are nowadays. It just a plain and simple fact.
Just like you're just all old AF.
game pass says noMicrotransactions is just how games are nowadays. It just a plain and simple fact.
Just like you're just all old AF.
From the South Park about phone games with micro payments:Its like that here with booze ads. "drink responsibly" Whatever that means.
I don't get the vibe of avoiding things on principle when you haven't the faintest idea about the "things" your avoiding or what principles you're even avoiding.Also I don't get the vibe of accepting when things are shit. You can voice your displeasure and vote with your money. I'm not a gamer but If I was I'd probably avoid games with stupid monetization on principle
Dude. The kids spend bulk money just to get friggen skins in games. They don't offer a shortcut, tactical advantage or any benefit whatsoever. Its friggen annoying. If you're gonna buy something, it better do something like win the game or make you massively over powered against the other plebs.Microtransactions in most games are basically an optional paid shortcut for the lazy or impatient.
Gary. First of all I made a blanket statement. Not a gaming related statement so me being a gamer or not being a gamer does not invalidate my statement of "I don't get the vibe of accepting when things are shit. You can voice your displeasure and vote with your money".I don't get the vibe of avoiding things on principle when you haven't the faintest idea about the "things" your avoiding or what principles you're even avoiding.
It's blatantly clear you're not a gamer and have no idea what you're talking about.
Microtransactions in most games are basically an optional paid shortcut for the lazy or impatient. There is very little content you can buy through microtransactions that you couldn't simply acquire through playing the games longer/better. Often taking hours of grinding but with no monetary payment necessary at all. This does cause some gamers to moan that some other gamers simply buy upgrades instead of earning them.
Much like buying an Ebike to ease/FFWD the boring uphill grind to the next fun part of a trail.. Which plenty of fuck wits with no idea about Ebikes also refuse to accept on principle.
Much like moaning and not purchasing an Ebike. Shunning microtransactions in a game doesn't register any sort if vote at all and doesn't harm the multi billion $ games industry in the slightest.
I don't think skins are a problem. Gambling like mechanisms of lootboxing are worse. Not only they screw with your dopamine in your brain but teach kids to be gamblers. Some companies literally lock the best content in games behind low chance lootboxes that require you to spend until you get it.Dude. The kids spend bulk money just to get friggen skins in games. They don't offer a shortcut, tactical advantage or any benefit whatsoever. Its friggen annoying. If you're gonna buy something, it better do something like win the game or make you massively over powered against the other plebs.
I mean I'll waste my money getting bike shit that looks better, but thats a completely different thing that I won't let my kid know about at all.
so much for that promise......I've stated my opinion and really can't be bothered replying back and forth...
If you actually paid any attention to my posts here over the last 20yrs you might have realised I tend not to make comment on subjects I don't know anything about at all. That's when it's time to ask questions or listen.seriously cut the crap with being an expert on everything. You don't know everything about everything.
Only because of weak parenting.Dude. The kids spend bulk money just to get friggen skins in games.
Depends on the odds.Would anyone really be tempted to take up gambling because some pretty little blonde cyclist promoted it?
Judging by the $50 billion profit they made last year, pretty much every kid that doesn't have stingy grumpy Scottish parentsOnly because of weak parenting.
Which kids are you referring to?