It's interesting to me that the Obama administration has (for now at least) decided against releasing photos of dead Osama. The rationale for this makes some sense, as I think Brian Williams put it, (paraphrasing) "the photo would be used as the cellphone and laptop background for every extremist as a rallying cry or source of motivation to carry out acts of terror" .
Probably true. So what would be the upside of releasing it? Id like to believe that a photo of dead Bin Laden would quell some doubts among the public and 9/11 truther types, but I know that's not the case. These conspiracy theory nutjobs (who are seemingly multiplying) would find a way to turn the photographic proof into evidence of an even bigger conspiracy, I'd guess by pointing out blurry pixels and calling it a photoshop, so it would be a pretty useless gesture on that front.
On the other hand, why does the government have to protect me from seeing a gory photo? I paid for it. Im a grown adult and can choose whether or not to view it. What do you guys think?
Probably true. So what would be the upside of releasing it? Id like to believe that a photo of dead Bin Laden would quell some doubts among the public and 9/11 truther types, but I know that's not the case. These conspiracy theory nutjobs (who are seemingly multiplying) would find a way to turn the photographic proof into evidence of an even bigger conspiracy, I'd guess by pointing out blurry pixels and calling it a photoshop, so it would be a pretty useless gesture on that front.
On the other hand, why does the government have to protect me from seeing a gory photo? I paid for it. Im a grown adult and can choose whether or not to view it. What do you guys think?