They were more suggestions really, as opposed to recommendationsSkaredShtles said:I thought those were only recommendations on the Interstates?
Of course, I could be wrong.
They were more suggestions really, as opposed to recommendationsSkaredShtles said:I thought those were only recommendations on the Interstates?
I had to vote for the majority of what I do, but I'm sure someone can argue with me...I Are Baboon said:Somebody needs to vote NO and defend their stance (and actually mean it) to make this thread more interesting.
I suspect the only reason cigarettes are legal and not wearing seatbelts is illegal is that PIP layers haven't formed a large enough lobby yet.Cooter Brown said:Sure, by making seatbelts mandatory, they are encroaching on the choice I should be able to make as a free, educated american whether or not I want to wear it or not. And also being able to make a traffic stop for that reason is just another way to criminalize normal citizens who don't want to wear them. I don't see the gov't saying it is illegal to smoke cigarettes. Yet the final outcome of smoking is the same as a fatal car wreck. But they let the general public make that choice for themselves, and a lot of folks who make the choice to smoke aren't even educated enough to know what it will do to them in the end.
This is directed at me. Guaranteed.bluebug32 said:My seatbelt and I are good buddies. It bugs me when people sit in the backseat and don't wear one. It's such a simple thing to do, like wearing a helmet
same here because it is your fault as the driver of the car if someone is not wearing their seatbelt.jacksonpt said:Always, end of story. And I make people wear them if they are passengers in my vehicle.
SkaredShtles said:Yeah, but smoking makes you look cool. I still fail to see how wearing or not wearing a seatbelt is a "lifestyle" choice.
Besides - what educated American wouldn't wear a seatbelt? Seems to me only dimwits wouldn't............
I can see the argument for motorcycle helmets.Andy_B said:I think Coot should have used the Motorcycle Helmet law...
In some states Bikers are not required to wear one when on public road/highways...
then i better start doing both....SkaredShtles said:I can see the argument for motorcycle helmets.
'Cause like smoking, going lidless on a moto is cool.
Andy_B said:I think Coot should have used the Motorcycle Helmet law...
In some states Bikers are not required to wear one when on public road/highways...
and its even cooler being in a wheel chair, or having emphzyma, those are cool too......SkaredShtles said:I can see the argument for motorcycle helmets.
'Cause like smoking, going lidless on a moto is cool.
Then since you've already won the lottery once, it's probably best that you always wear one from now on.douglas said:I was in a bad crash, and I dont see how I would have lived.....IF I had a seatbelt on
me too.Ciaran said:I used to race go-karts and had dreams of racing big cars... during this time I took a few driving/racing lessons and seminars. After learning about how incredibly easy it is to die in a low sped crash I will NEVER drive without one. In fact I would prefer a 5 point harnes and a roll cage to tell the truth.
Same.JRogers said:Always wear one. I actually can't even really bring myself to not wear one even if I am only driving like 50 feet. It's just like wearing a helmet for me- automatic.
Mine has saved me at least twice.I Are Baboon said:I just don't feel right without it strapped across my chest....it feels very uncomfortable.
if i ever get a sporty type car those are two things that i might add on just because. when i went for a ride in a race-ready porsche turbo on some side streets a few years back im glad that i had that much protection around me. the driver got it up to 75 on a road with a 30mph limit so having to stop suddenly then would have been bad had i not been strapped in. plus the 5 point harness is actually quite comfortable, usually moreso than most regular belts that ive tried.Ciaran said:In fact I would prefer a 5 point harnes and a roll cage to tell the truth.
I thought it was only a recommendation unless there's a policeman nearby. :evil:SkaredShtles said:I thought those were only recommendations on the Interstates?
A valid point!COmtbiker12 said:I thought it was only a recommendation unless there's a policeman nearby. :evil:
is that how you got yr nickname?escapeartist said:Heres my seatbelt story: When i was 4 (im 17 now) i had a little incident with a Chrystler van that involved the back seat of the car being thrown about 20 feet from the van in the middle of a 4 lane road. Thats not really a huge deal unless a 4-year old happens to be in said seat, and I was. So instead of going to Walmart to get my Barny backpack for school, I was going to the ER. I was OK, but only because of the seatbelt.
I recommend you don't shoot yourself in the face.COmtbiker12 said:I thought it was only a recommendation unless there's a policeman nearby. :evil:
narlus said:see my post re: statistics. you were lucky.
btw, have you voted?
I'm just kidding... I always stay within 5 on normal streets and about 8 or so on the highway. I'm a wuss anyways, so no sense risking it.firetoole said:I recommend you don't shoot yourself in the face.
My wife does the exact samething.laura said:i will unbuckle my seat belt to put my deposit in the drive through at the bank, or drop of a prescription at walgreens, then i will buckle it back, and have to unbuckle it to get my deposit slip or receipt.
You know, when I'm on city streets I always stay <5mph over. Simply due to the fact that I wouldn't want people speeding through my neighborhood.COmtbiker12 said:I thought it was only a recommendation unless there's a policeman nearby. :evil: