ehhh....i think the greatest gift to this crumbling democracy would be term limits on the house/senate....but i'm pretty sure you would disagree....FTFY
ehhh....i think the greatest gift to this crumbling democracy would be term limits on the house/senate....but i'm pretty sure you would disagree....FTFY
Overturning citizens United. Doesn't matter how long a purchased representative is in office.ehhh....i think the greatest gift to this crumbling democracy would be term limits on the house/senate....but i'm pretty sure you would disagree....
Going to be interesting when Mueller moves over to the House investigative committees.
2 months from now?Going to be interesting when Mueller moves over to the House investigative committees.
I bet squeeb that Mueller, in full expectation of post election fuckery, already has indictments filed under seal.I'm guessing, well hoping really, that Mueller drops the hammer on Herr Twitler this week. He was noticeably silent in the run up to midterms.
Per DOJ policy.He was noticeably silent in the run up to midterms.
That's the thing though. If we lived in a functioning democracy he wouldn't have too.I bet squeeb that Mueller, in full expectation of post election fuckery, already has indictments filed under seal.
Called it!@jonKranked and I have had this discussion. No matter how the midterms swing, post election is liable to be extra interesting times.
Whoa....how old is that? Last I had seen Sinema was down over 2%.let me love you Arizona (#no jinx)
https://results.arizona.vote/#/featured/4/0
View attachment 131397
Of note: co-author George T. Conway III is the husband of Kellyanne. How that marriage works is beyond me.OPINION|Trump’s Appointment of the Acting Attorney General Is Unconstitutional
Opinion
Trump’s Appointment of the Acting Attorney General Is Unconstitutional
The president is evading the requirement to seek the Senate’s advice and consent for the nation’s chief law enforcement officer and the person who will oversee the Mueller investigation.
By Neal K. Katyal and George T. Conway III
Mr. Katyal and Mr. Conway are lawyers.
What now seems an eternity ago, the conservative law professor Steven Calabresi published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal in May arguing that Robert Mueller’s appointment as special counsel was unconstitutional. His article got a lot of attention, and it wasn’t long before President Trump picked up the argument, tweeting that “the Appointment of the Special Counsel is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL!”
Professor Calabresi’s article was based on the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2. Under that provision, so-called principal officers of the United States must be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate under its “Advice and Consent” powers.
He argued that Mr. Mueller was a principal officer because he is exercising significant law enforcement authority and that since he has not been confirmed by the Senate, his appointment was unconstitutional. As one of us argued at the time, he was wrong. What makes an officer a principal officer is that he or she reports only to the president. No one else in government is that person’s boss. But Mr. Mueller reports to Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general. So, Mr. Mueller is what is known as an inferior officer, not a principal one, and his appointment without Senate approval was valid.
But Professor Calabresi and Mr. Trump were right about the core principle. A principal officer must be confirmed by the Senate. And that has a very significant consequence today.
It means that Mr. Trump’s installation of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general of the United States after forcing the resignation of Jeff Sessions is unconstitutional. It’s illegal. And it means that anything Mr. Whitaker does, or tries to do, in that position is invalid.
more :
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html
a minute ago while speaking to press, Trump addressed him as "Mr. Kellyanne Conway". Rolf.Of note: co-author George T. Conway III is the husband of Kellyanne. How that marriage works is beyond me.
She swallowsOf note: co-author George T. Conway III is the husband of Kellyanne. How that marriage works is beyond me.
They're still going through ballots, next ballot update @ 7 PM tonight, they're not sure if Sinema's lead will hold (i.e. depends which precincts the remaining ballots are coming from, but her lead "could" grow.)Whoa....how old is that? Last I had seen Sinema was down over 2%.
You saw this, no? https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/she-works-for-trump-he-cant-stand-him-this-is-life-with-kellyanne-and-george-conway/2018/08/15/3b89b82a-9b46-11e8-843b-36e177f3081c_story.html?utm_term=.a99c72e61074Of note: co-author George T. Conway III is the husband of Kellyanne. How that marriage works is beyond me.
if you're democrats you sit on a box of ballots in a blue district as a backup if the election is close....Whoa....how old is that? Last I had seen Sinema was down over 2%.
might be time to stop visiting infowarsif you're democrats you sit on a box of ballots in a blue district as a backup if the election is close....
might want to have your sarcasm meter calibrated....might be time to stop visiting infowars
11/5:3rd Gear: How BMW’s American Operations Created A Booming Automotive Presence in South Carolina
To better understand why roughly a dozen states were engaged in a “bidding war” last year for Toyota and Mazda’s $1.6 billion joint venture facility, look no further than BMW’s operations in Spartanburg, South Carolina, where the company builds pretty much all its SUVs, including ones for export.
Automotive News, in its story “How BMW Energized an Entire State,” describes how the Bavarian automaker’s facility, erected in 1994, represented far more than just another manufacturing plant—it spawned an entire miniature automotive economy.
As the news site points out, South Carolina is now home to over 400 automotive companies, many of which are there because of BMW. In the past 18 months alone BMW suppliers have dropped $200 million on new project in the state.
One by one, the story mentions major BMW parts companies making significant investments in South Carolina. For example, the news site says that JTEKT North America bearing company, whose headquarters is located in a Clemson auto research facility that BMW helped found, said in May that it will spend $19.4 million on an expansion project in Walhalla, South Carolina.
The story also mentions auto parts supplier Bo Parts GmbH, which spent $5 million on a 60,000 square-foot operation to “support [BMW’s] global growth in low-volume production and service parts.” Another BMW supplier, Gestamp Group, spent $129 million expanding its plant last year. MM Technics, a German company that supplies “metal structural parts” for BMW, invested $12.6 million on a plant in South Carolina.
Then there’s a Spanish company that supplies BMW with interior parts:
Early this year, the Spanish auto interior supplier Grupo Antolin said it will invest $50 million to build three BMW manufacturing sites near Spartanburg. A Grupo Antolin spokesman said the plants also will supply General Motors, Ford Motor Co. and Honda Co.
And there’s Tier One juggernaut, Magna, which supplies BMW with seats:
Magna International completed a $29 million plant in Spartanburg last year to produce seats for the BMW X5, X6 and, later this year, X7. Then in March, Magna said it will spend $8 million to expand the plant.
The takeaway here is that a major successful automotive plant promises much more than just hundreds of jobs at that facility—it has potential to result in major investments by ancillary companies, resulting in an economic boom many magnitudes stronger than the initial investment. And it’s all threatened by looming tariffs and the escalating trade war.
4th Gear: Trump Says NAFTA Car Tariffs Would Be Canada’s “Ruination”
NAFTA talks between the U.S. and Mexico seem to have settled down, but America’s friendly northern neighbors are apparently not being friendly enough to yield to America’s every will. And that, you might imagine, has the president up in arms.
According to the Detroit News, Trump said in North Dakota on Friday that Canada is ripping the U.S. off, and that a 20 percent car tariff could be on the horizon if Canada doesn’t agree to a deal.
“In some countries, including Canada, a tax on cars would be the ruination of the country. That’s how big it is. The ruination of the country,” he said, according to the news site.
He also said that talks with Canada are still in progress. “We’ll see what happens,” he said. “Look, everybody wants to deal with us. We’ve never had a president that dealt,” he said.
One of the biggest sticking points between the two countries deals with dairy, with the Detroit News writing:
White House Economic Adviser Larry Kudlow, speaking Friday on Fox Business, said Canada will have to make dairy concessions for a deal. “The word that continues to block the deal is m-i-l-k,” Kudlow said. “The United States would rather have a trade deal with Canada, but it has to be a good deal.”
Hopefully this comes to an end soon, and that no countries are ruined as a result.
Worth pointing out that this is not the first time this administration has released a doctored video to support it's claims.Anyone see this? The official reason they gave Acsota the boot was something allong the lines of "he assaulted a female intern". But when you watch the video she tries to take the mike he's just like, nah bitch, I'll keep this.
Then Sanders releases a video of the incident which is literally sped up in one spot to make it look worse
https://www.indy100.com/article/im-acosta-cnn-donald-trump-sarah-huckabee-sanders-cnn-ban-watch-video-press-conference-8623776
Watch the video if you don't want to bother with the poorly written article.
Wonder if there's any legal reason Acosta can't sue Sanders for libel. Cause that seems like a pretty open and shut case.Worth pointing out that this is not the first time this administration has released a doctored video to support it's claims.
Sounds like maybe not:Wonder if there's any legal reason Acosta can't sue Sanders for libel. Cause that seems like a pretty open and shut case.