Into his and his mates bank accounts?Speaking of Rick Perry and draining the swamp
Opinion | The Rich Really Do Pay Lower Taxes Than You (Published 2019)
The 400 wealthiest Americans now pay a lower rate than the middle class.www.nytimes.com
we're now at "multiple"New York Times: 2nd intelligence official might submit whistleblower complaint
A second intelligence official with concerns and more direct knowledge regarding President Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine is considering filing a whistleblower complaint, The New York Times reported Friday.amp.cnn.com
A second whistleblower may emerge.
Animated!Opinion | The Rich Really Do Pay Lower Taxes Than You (Published 2019)
The 400 wealthiest Americans now pay a lower rate than the middle class.www.nytimes.com
"But The Bidens!" - Brian, I assume.Into his and his mates bank accounts?
Surely that still counts as draining it?
The Republicans are waiting for the Democrats to vote for the impeachment inquiry. Without the vote, the Democrats can subpoena anyone they want and control who they want to talk to without interference from the right. If the left votes and it passes to move forward with the impeachment inquiry, the right can then subpoena whomever they want, leveling the playing field. That's why the WH blocked the last subpoena, the ambassador has already said Trump has done nothing wrong and was willing to testify on his behalf. Problem is, it would be a one sided grilling. Why do you think Pelosi hasn't moved forward with a vote? She realizes it would get very ugly for the left, that's why she's been dragging her feet with impeachment in the first place. She knows what the outcome will probably be in 2020 if they pursue it further. She's a smart lady, she talked about the impeachment inquiry only to quite her side as several members have been crying impeachment since the day Trump won the election.As any innocent man would do.
Trump Administration Blocks Ambassador's Testimony, A Key Witness In Ukraine Scandal
Gordon Sondland, a Trump donor and Trump's ambassador to the European Union, was scheduled to be deposed by Congress for his role in the widening Ukraine scandal involving the president.www.npr.org
Yeah, except for betraying US citizens to a foreign power.That's why the WH blocked the last subpoena, the ambassador has already said Trump has done nothing wrong and was willing to testify on his behalf.
But there has been no proof of that. I take that back, according to Adam Schiff, CNN & MSNBC there isYeah, except for betraying US citizens to a foreign power.
I disagree. The written synopsis of the call, released by the WH, clearly shows the proof. You have to WANT to not see this.But there has been no proof of that. I take that back, according to Adam Schiff, CNN & MSNBC there is
Also, this.Lets be clear, Trump is stalling to avoid prosecution.
Boy, that sounds an awful lot like you just admitted that the White House is committing obstruction of justice.That's why the WH blocked the last subpoena,
Sondland, the guy who gave 1 million dollars to the Trump inauguration committee and suddenly became an ambassador after the fact? Yeah, no conflict there.the ambassador has already said Trump has done nothing wrong
Problem is, it would be a one sided grilling.
Because she doesn't have to? It's not required by the Constitution. Impeachment is real even if it doesn't have a floor vote. It is an inherent power granted to the co-equal branch of the government. Crying about it doesn't make it less true. This is a bad faith argument put forward by the right so clowns like Nunes and Gym Jordan can start a three ringed circus featuring Buttery Males, Uranium Beghazi shows, Pizza Gate Basements, and the Deep State Players sideshow.Why do you think Pelosi hasn't moved forward with a vote?
How far up shit creek are you when Trumps own DOJ is literally trying to re-litigate Nixons stonewalling of congress? You know that's Nixon was actually impeached for, right? For trying to block a congressional inquiry.She realizes it would get very ugly for the left, that's why she's been dragging her feet with impeachment in the first place. She knows what the outcome will probably be in 2020 if they pursue it further.
Except for the presidents own words. You know, it's in the "summary". Imagine what they didn't release if they thought that was the OK stuff.But there has been no proof of that.
Stormy Daniels sees what you did there.Not a fungi to be around.
And the text messages, especially with the last awkward "there was no quid pro quo, for the record" line... which is even more damning now that it has come out that that hotel-running campaign donor-turned-EU-ambassador spoke with Trump immediately before sending that text.I disagree. The written synopsis of the call, released by the WH, clearly shows the proof. You have to WANT to not see this.
Also, this.
Also, here's another fun one. You know why she doesn't have to? Because republicans made it possible.Why do you think Pelosi hasn't moved forward with a vote?
hearing this reminded me of a movie called Beyond the Gates. It was about a small school in Rwanda that was protected by military, until it wasn't. The idea that the US would leave the Syrians to fend for themselves, after all that's happened and what the Kurds have done for us, is sick. Those people must feel doomed.Oh yeah. Turkey is now shelling Kurds in Syria.
We have a long history of fucking over these 'allies', just ask the Montagnards, ARVN, Iraqis, Afghans.........The idea that the US would leave the Syrians to fend for themselves, after all that's happened and what the Kurds have done for us, is sick. Those people must feel doomed.
The next generation of western hating, Islamic terrorists, don't create themselves!hearing this reminded me of a movie called Beyond the Gates. It was about a small school in Rwanda that was protected by military, until it wasn't. The idea that the US would leave the Syrians to fend for themselves, after all that's happened and what the Kurds have done for us, is sick. Those people must feel doomed.
How much did he contribute to the Trump campaign?Senior Interior official denied there was an ozone hole and compared undocumented immigrants to cancer | CNN Politics
The acting director of the federal agency responsible for managing one in every 10 acres of land in the United States has repeatedly denied the existence of climate change and falsely claimed in a 1990s speech there was no credible evidence of a hole in the ozone layer.www.cnn.com
On Tuesday, Meadows dismissed concerns about the communications of the two diplomats, Kurt Volker and Gordon Sondland, saying that their use of personal phones or encrypted apps was acceptable because they ultimately handed over their correspondence to the State Department.
Despite those rules, the use of WhatsApp and other messaging services is fairly widespread at the State Department, and those who use them often fail to take screenshots of the communications and forward them on in official emails for the archives as instructed.
“Few, few people do that,” said one former official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss compliance issues he witnessed.
“The irony is that Pompeo’s diplomats are using personal devices when he personally went ballistic on Hillary Clinton for that,” the official added.
Clinton employed a more elaborate workaround of State Department guidelines through her use of a private server, but some legal experts said the disparity in outrage in the two cases was telling.
“ ‘Pot meet kettle’ doesn’t do the situation justice,” said Brad Moss, a Washington-based attorney who specializes in national security and classification cases.
Oh yeah. Turkey is now shelling Kurds in Syria.
"The United States does not endorse this attack and has made it clear to Turkey that this operation is a bad idea," the President said in a statement from the White House. CNN
I wonder if they helped us in Korea or Vietnam...Even for that "thing" you elected, this is pretty crazily drug or dementia induced fucking out there thing to say.
The US president told reporters that the Kurds “didn’t help us in the second world war, they didn’t help us with Normandy as an example – they mention the names of different battles, they weren’t there”
So why not have a vote? If the left is so confident they're correct with all their allegations, have a house vote. They should have the numbers to do so. The republicans want the vote to bring the hearing out to the public, if there is no vote, the left can keep everything private, will continue with their false narratives. Adam Schiff has been making shit up since the beginning, if it is behind closed doors, he'll continue to do the same. Why not bring it out into the open? They won't do it because they know & fear it will more than likely backfire on them, just like the Mueller report did. I would think you'd want to see both sides have their fair say, don't you? You hate Trump and that's totally fine, but shouldn't the playing field be fair. All I'm saying is let both sides plead their case openly & fairly.Boy, that sounds an awful lot like you just admitted that the White House is committing obstruction of justice.
Sondland, the guy who gave 1 million dollars to the Trump inauguration committee and suddenly became an ambassador after the fact? Yeah, no conflict there.
Because she doesn't have to? It's not required by the Constitution. Impeachment is real even if it doesn't have a floor vote. It is an inherent power granted to the co-equal branch of the government. Crying about it doesn't make it less true. This is a bad faith argument put forward by the right so clowns like Nunes and Gym Jordan can start a three ringed circus featuring Buttery Males, Uranium Beghazi shows, Pizza Gate Basements, and the Deep State Players sideshow.
How far up shit creek are you when Trumps own DOJ is literally trying to re-litigate Nixons stonewalling of congress? You know that's Nixon was actually impeached for, right? For trying to block a congressional inquiry.
1. obstruction of justice
2. abuse of power
3. DEFIANCE OF SUBPOENAS
Except for the presidents own words. You know, it's in the "summary". Imagine what they didn't release if they thought that was the OK stuff.
Bastards definitely weren't there for the Normandy invasion in 1066.I wonder if they helped us in Korea or Vietnam...