Right, your accused, but do you want the right to defend yourself and have your side ask questions on how, why, motives they got the information. Schiff said he never had contact with the whistleblower when it first came out, only to find he or his staff met with that person beforehand. Schiff read a bogus transcript at the beginning of this in front of congress, he out right lied. He said he had proof of Russia collusion, but till this day yet to provide it. So I feel its very important the right has access to cross examine everyone. Remember, the transcripts are based on one sided questioning.Fine accuse me second hand. But if that starts a snowball of first hand reports and evidence, the second hand doesn't matter a damned bit anymore; it was just the trigger that started the slide. If the only evidence was a second hand accusation, then yes, I understand the demand to find the accuser. However, there are now mountains of first hand, under oath evidence, by Trump's appointee's supporting the whistlerblower's statements. That person no longer matters. /conversation.