have you no faith in the 2020 candidates...And the POTUS's supporters will dismiss it all as a bunch of nonsense... because we all know that professors are over-educated libtards. And this circus-court will simply be PROOF of it for them.
And then the Senate won't do shit about impeachment, Herr Twittler will claim to be vindicated, the Dems won't be able to get their shit together, and we'll get 4 more years of this horseshit.
The part of Turley's testimony that made me chuckle was his insistence that the investigation was moving along too hastily without adequate evidence gathering. If I didn't know better, it's almost like all of the people issued lawful subpoenas compelling their testimony on the matter who could fill in the aforementioned blanks have refused to testify under the fallacy of executive privilege. I'm no law professor, but that sounds an awful like obstruction of justice to me, which, funnily enough, is also an impeachable offense.Turley? His argument was semantics. Again. That's all the "smart" GOP'ers have. Splitting hairs on what "is", is.
Cause, and I know you'll find this shocking, but he sure felt different about congress' impeachment role when it was Clinton.
His argument was "If you rob a bank, but drop the money bag before you get to the getaway car, it's not real robbery".
Because its still based on assumption & hearsay. Trump did in fact ask Ukraine to look into the Bidens and wanted to make sure there was no more corruption in the Ukraine before releasing funds. The question is, did he withhold aid as part of a deal? That's where the problem is. There is no proof of quid pro quo, only presumption by Sondland and others. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo and was never aware of the US withholding aid. Shouldn't that count for something? I guess it depends how bad you want the president impeached, right? The Democrats have been looking to impeach the day he was elected, so we know they've been looking for any reason to get him out.Am I missing something here or does Jim Jordan just keep yelling that there is no evidence, despite the over whelming amount of it ?
Well, you have 2 candidates who want to tax everyone from here to eternity to fund all the "free stuff". Then you have a VP who has trouble speaking and unfortunately the gears are slipping really bad in his head and stumbles bad with his words. Mayor Pete may be their best chance, but doesn't do well with minority votes. Bloomberg is too wealthy for the far left and so on.have you no faith in the 2020 candidates...
I think Trudeau might have been a little embarrassed by Trump when he called him out in front of everyone for not contributing their 2%. Kinda bummed Trudeau didn't come to the summit dressed as Aladdin"Ha, got you good you fucker!"- president Bigly Brain Trust.
Trump caught on microphone congratulating himself about his Trudeau attack
US president abruptly cancelled Nato press conference after video surfaced showing world leaders laughing at himwww.independent.co.uk
Ahhh, the Mafia Boss Defense.There is no proof of quid pro quo, only presumption by Sondland and others. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo and was never aware of the US withholding aid. Shouldn't that count for something?
Well, there are no laws saying a president must show their tax returns. Plus all the other presidents were in politics so its easy to show their returns as its based on what they made while serving in congress, not a billionaire businessman. He'll let people testify once the playing field is level, when the right can call & subpoena anyone they want, like Adam Schiff. Its very partisan, both sides have their minds made up and both sides wont budge.Trump, committed to deception, devoid of morals, who constantly boasts of his own merit.
Who says he is innocent of all wrong doing yet prevents anyone from seeing his tax returns, won't let pertinent testimony be heard, removes people who are loyal to the nation rather than himself...
Yeah Brian we know where you hang your hat.
Ahhh, the Mafia Boss Defense.
“Big Donny didn’t actually tell pugface to whack little Vinnie, but we all knew what it meant. Well, Vinnie didn’t get whacked...you think Vinnie would be dumb enough to open his mouth and blab that there was a hit put out on him?”
It’s like the porn definition...we know it when we see it.
And to refuse to see it is the definition of...
You know it’s coming...
OBTUSE
The question is, can you impeach a president based only on hearsay & presumption? Is that considered a high crime & misdemeanor? Once again, the left has wanted him out since the beginning. The Democrats would look way more credible if they weren't crying from the start and saying we'll get him out of office, we have our ways. Again, since day one.Ahhh, the Mafia Boss Defense.
“Big Donny didn’t actually tell pugface to whack little Vinnie, but we all knew what it meant. Well, Vinnie didn’t get whacked...you think Vinnie would be dumb enough to open his mouth and blab that there was a hit put out on him?”
It’s like the porn definition...we know it when we see it.
And to refuse to see it is the definition of...
You know it’s coming...
OBTUSE
You couldn’t see that he was a corrupt, venal, philandering, tax cheating, pathological liar, bad businessman, two faced, fragile piece of shit from day one yourself? Because those with clear vision sure could...The question is, can you impeach a president based only on hearsay & presumption? Is that considered a high crime & misdemeanor? Once again, the left has wanted him out since the beginning. The Democrats would look way more credible if they weren't crying from the start and saying we'll get him out of office, we have our ways. Again, since day one.
All the facepalms in the universe. I know you’re just parroting the bullshit talking points you pick up on Fox, but good lord I can’t even fathom the mental gymnastics to actually believe that.Trump did in fact ask Ukraine to look into the Bidens and wanted to make sure there was no more corruption in the Ukraine before releasing funds.
Oh, I see, it’s not “hear- say” if Trump admits to it on live TV as well as Mick Mulvaney ?Because its still based on assumption & hearsay. Trump did in fact ask Ukraine to look into the Bidens and wanted to make sure there was no more corruption in the Ukraine before releasing funds. The question is, did he withhold aid as part of a deal? That's where the problem is. There is no proof of quid pro quo, only presumption by Sondland and others. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo and was never aware of the US withholding aid. Shouldn't that count for something? I guess it depends how bad you want the president impeached, right? The Democrats have been looking to impeach the day he was elected, so we know they've been looking for any reason to get him out.
Lest we forget, the administration had the opportunity to participate in yesterdays hearings, yet oddly somehow found itself otherwise occupied.Trump will NEVER let those people testify because they cannot do so under oath and penalty of law without contradicting this narrative. If they could clear him, he would let them speak. If the documents subpoenaed could clear him, he'd release those too. The fact that he isn't shows his consciousness of guilt.
after this weeks NATO tantrum / stormout, it's super effective!NOW! GO AWAY OR WE WILL BE FORCED TO TAUNT YOU A SECOND TIME!
North Korea threatens to resume calling Trump ‘dotard’
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korea threatened Thursday to resume insults of U.S. President Donald Trump and consider him a “dotard” if he keeps using provocative language, such as referring to its leader as “rocket man.”apnews.com
WHY DO YOU THINK WE HAVE THIS OUTRAGEOUS ACCENT?!?after this weeks NATO tantrum / stormout, it's super effective!
excessive elderberry consumptionWHY DO YOU THINK WE HAVE THIS RIDICULOUS ACCENT?!?
Oh, I see, it’s not “hear- say” if Trump admits to it on live TV as well as Mick Mulvaney ?
Let me help you fathom those gymnasticsAll the facepalms in the universe. I know you’re just parroting the bullshit talking points you pick up on Fox, but good lord I can’t even fathom the mental gymnastics to actually believe that.
Obviously fake news.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”Obviously fake news.
Nope, but he said he would. I’m all for holding him to his word, so whatever facilitates this has my support. If he had just flat out refused from the beginning, then I wouldn’t care.Well, there are no laws saying a president must show their tax returns.
Do you mean to imply that his audit claim my have been disingenuous? Why I never!“I can’t, I’m being audited”
The President's 'Under Audit' Tax Excuse Is, And Always Has Been, Bogus
Today's the day Democrats have asked the IRS to provide President Trump's tax returns. Don't expect the issue to be resolved quickly. The president has repeatedly stated that being under audit is preventing him from releasing the returns. This is false. What might the taxes show?www.forbes.com
(From That liberal rag...)
You're right! CNN & MSNBC are totally reliable & unbiased news sources that have talked positive about Trump up until now.All the facepalms in the universe. I know you’re just parroting the bullshit talking points you pick up on Fox, but good lord I can’t even fathom the mental gymnastics to actually believe that.
Is there actually anything positive to say?You're right! CNN & MSNBC are totally reliable & unbiased news sources that have talked positive about Trump up until now.
It is impossible for a "news source" to be unbiased. It is, however, possible to separate sensationalist idiocy mills such as Fox News from sources which report fact inasmuch as reporters and editorial staff can determine it, e.g. The New Yorker. I sample approximately fifty news sites, treating each with a reasonable degree of skepticism, and suggest, Brian, that you might consider the same.You're right! CNN & MSNBC are totally reliable & unbiased news sources that have talked positive about Trump up until now.
Dude - just watch the hearings. They're live. Not "interpreted" by anyone. Are you telling me that that man is *NOT* guilty of attempting to bribe Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden? I mean - JUST LISTEN WITH YOUR OWN EARS. Fucking hell - the fat twat did it and GOT CAUGHT.You're right! CNN & MSNBC are totally reliable & unbiased news sources that have talked positive about Trump up until now.
Stock market, economy, jobs, unemployment is the lowest in 50 years. Making an effort to bring jobs back to the US. At least the guy is making an attempt, unlike the last several presidents. I don't think I've ever heard them touch on that, because that would be saying something positive about him. God forbid!2
Is there actually anything positive to say?
Please share.
You just cited Obama’s enduring legacy...what the hell has Trump done besides balloon the deficit into the fucking TRILLIONS?Stock market, economy, jobs, unemployment is the lowest in 50 years. Making an effort to bring jobs back to the US. At least the guy is making an attempt, unlike the last several presidents. I don't think I've ever heard them touch on that, because that would be saying something positive about him. God forbid!
Again, hearsay. I listened to bits & pieces of the hearings. He asked to look into Biden, but no quid pro quo. Not one person said they had actual proof, even the whistleblower is going by hearsay. Three of the 4 attorneys yesterday are completely and known to be anti Trump. So yep an unbiased opinion.Dude - just watch the hearings. They're live. Not "interpreted" by anyone. Are you telling me that that man is *NOT* guilty of attempting to bribe Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden? I mean - JUST LISTEN WITH YOUR OWN EARS. Fucking hell - the fat twat did it and GOT CAUGHT.
I'm not sure how someone can arrive at any other conclusion if they watch/listen for themselves, unless they are:
- Naïve
- Obtuse
- DGAF
- All of the above
Glad Obama didn't raise the deficit an additional $9T while he was in office. Oh wait, yes he did. China's economy is hurting because of the tariffs. Ever look at the job #'s?You just cited Obama’s enduring legacy...what the hell has Trump done besides balloon the deficit into the fucking TRILLIONS?
Manufacturing is down, agriculture is suffering, I just don’t see it.
not defending orange julius....pretty sure it went from 9-10 trillion to almost 20 trillion under barry...balloon the deficit into the fucking TRILLIONS?