Damn!dw said:we are planning on pulling the model for 2005
If Spookydave can set it up, I know anyone can...! C'mon, I need one!dw said:We havent had a huge interest in this product. Our test models have been in the field for over two years now, and so far results have been good, but we dont feel like the guide is up to the performance levels that WE expect, and so we are planning on pulling the model for 2005. The 3RS guides need to be set up pretty perfectly to work correctly. The 3RS may return later in the future if the market for this product grows and we are able to develop the product further to make installation and setup no-brainer simple for the average rider.
Dave
That's really relative. There are a lot of people running DRS guides. Comparitively, there are a tiny amount of people running Heims, at least from what I've seen.Kanter said:Ya I emailed and called them about it, too. I guess thats not enough either. There are a lot of people running Heims so I am possitive the 3RS would sell.
Actually, i was kind of hoping that i could do both.dante said:I'm confused, why isn't a 36/22 or a 38/24 DRS setup good enough? 3-ring guides were popular when it was just people with 22/32/42 cranks, but even so I rarely used the 42 to its potential...
It's for a cross country bike..a full-on, real XC hardtail (or as close as I'll ever get...it has a 130mm stem, flat bars and bar-ends at least, even though it's more of a dual-slalom style frame), and I do use the big ring. I just have a tendency to lose chains when I ride through rough stuff. I've had several DRSs and loved them, but I just wanted a full spread on this bike.dante said:I'm confused, why isn't a 36/22 or a 38/24 DRS setup good enough? 3-ring guides were popular when it was just people with 22/32/42 cranks, but even so I rarely used the 42 to its potential...
Why is there an inherent link between the two? Chain retention is a separate issue from the need for a bashguard. I just don't want my chain rattling off. Plus, I can buy a bashguard to cover the entire outer ring if it's really essential-I don't have to settle for a shorter gearing. (and I was hoping the 3rs in final form would actually have a thin 'rim-style' bashguard to fit outside the 44t.) It is amazing how vulnerable you feel without a bashguard once you're used to one (along with the added ground clearance), but that doesn't mean I don't need a big ring.punkassean said:I think it's a silly product. If you want the chain retention, you will most likely want the protection of a basher as well.
That combo works fine for me (and many others), but not on our XC bikes. Do you think pro XC riders should lost their big rings because you don't think it's necessary? Just because YOU don't want a 44t ring doesn't mean the rest of us care.punkassean said:I also think that a well chosen 2-ring will work very well for 99% of situations (24-38~ish).
SPANDEX WEARING RACER WEENIE ALERT!!!!! :eviltonguMikeD said:Why is there an inherent link between the two? Chain retention is a separate issue from the need for a bashguard. I just don't want my chain rattling off. Plus, I can buy a bashguard to cover the entire outer ring if it's really essential-I don't have to settle for a shorter gearing. (and I was hoping the 3rs in final form would actually have a thin 'rim-style' bashguard to fit outside the 44t.) It is amazing how vulnerable you feel without a bashguard once you're used to one (along with the added ground clearance), but that doesn't mean I don't need a big ring.
That combo works fine for me (and many others), but not on our XC bikes. Do you think pro XC riders should lost their big rings because you don't think it's necessary? Just because YOU don't want a 44t ring doesn't mean the rest of us care.
MD
Most of the pro XC guys i have seen run a 24-38ish dual ring combo to save weight as they hardley ever get to use a 44 tooth.MikeD said:That combo works fine for me (and many others), but not on our XC bikes. Do you think pro XC riders should lost their big rings because you don't think it's necessary? Just because YOU don't want a 44t ring doesn't mean the rest of us care.
MD
I think the XC "2x9" setup is more like a ~30-42 or larger...Cave Dweller said:Most of the pro XC guys i have seen run a 24-38ish dual ring combo to save weight as they hardley ever get to use a 44 tooth.
Sorry, been licking the chamois on my XC shorts clean.punkassean said:What's up witchya bad breath???
MikeD said:Sorry, been licking the chamois on my XC shorts clean.
I remember when your loc. read that.MikeD said:Heh, thanks...onion rings was my first thought, of course, but I figured I'd be a little more creative.
Speaking of Paul's Boutique, I went through some of my pre-teen life being called "Clarence" by my big brother, and never understood why. My old 'location' tag used to read "running from the law, the press, and the parents...'
MD