[DaveW]

Yeah undercover cops here have done that.... And then successfully sued the police department for compensation for the trauma of it all.

 

[StiHacka]

I think the report says that cops open fire when they see other cops shooting, without really knowing what they are trying to hit.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2014/04/03/harvard-issues-report-marathon-bombing-response/EcQRG8lN4LYzwA6p3U0Y5H/story.html

 

[$tinkle]

http://www.forfeiturereform.com/

ref:

 

[$tinkle]

follow-up, but nowhere near closure

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/04/report-bo-secret-service-shot-killed-unarmed-mother-in-back-of-head-2932224.html

 

[Pesqueeb]

follow-up, but nowhere near closure

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/04/report-bo-secret-service-shot-killed-unarmed-mother-in-back-of-head-2932224.html

WND has exclusively learned

And when we say "WND exclusively learned" we mean, the tinfoil slipped and let in a mind ray. Because if there is a place on teh interwebz that embodies journalistic integrity, It's world net daily.

 

[$tinkle]

And when we say "WND exclusively learned" we mean, the tinfoil slipped and let in a mind ray. Because if there is a place on teh interwebz that embodies journalistic integrity, It's world net daily.

did you read the whole article, or just tune out when you saw "WND"? aren't you troubled by governmental fear mongering & manipulation of the narrative? remember a little dust up in iraq about a decade ago?
forget that, let's recall how the police "handled" another "scary black threat": oscar grant

i've been reading other sources cited, and am troubled by the hair-trigger & uber paranoia our gov't cops have in the d.c. area, and being permitted to treat that as what equates to a free fire zone. it rivals nyc in the over-the-top responses to perceived (manufactured?) threats.

 

[Pesqueeb]

I just tuned out because

aren't you troubled by WND fear mongering & manipulation of the narrative?

Complete fiction masquerading as news makes up 90% of what gets published on WND, so you'll excuse me for not taking anything they say seriously.

 

[$tinkle]

Complete fiction masquerading as news makes up 90% of what gets published on WND, so you'll excuse me for not taking anything they say seriously.

you just made the baby jerome corsi cry

 

[Pesqueeb]

 

[$tinkle]

http://cleveland.cbslocal.com/2014/04/10/vacationing-family-pulled-over-handcuffed-at-gunpoint-by-air-force-base-security/

"AF security forces" - you say? sounds about right. jackholes.

 

[Pesqueeb]

http://cleveland.cbslocal.com/2014/04/10/vacationing-family-pulled-over-handcuffed-at-gunpoint-by-air-force-base-security/

"AF security forces" - you say? sounds about right. jackholes.

WPAFB security officials said the incident turned out to be a misunderstanding, and that the authorities had followed protocol given the information reported through the 911 call.

Isn't there some sort of "protocol" for "Old lady with a car full of kids"? Jesus.

 

[$tinkle]

Isn't there some sort of "protocol" for "Old lady with a car full of kids"? Jesus.

they could have been gypsies.

can't be too careful

 

[Pesqueeb]

they could have been gypsies.

can't be too careful

 

[jonKranked]

Isn't there some sort of "protocol" for "Old lady with a car full of kids"? Jesus.

jesus wasn't in the car

 

[$tinkle]

jesus wasn't in the car

$6 + shipping (free for Prime members) could have saved* them.



*see what i did there?

 

[mykel]

I thought Jebus was everywhere, or is that 1/3 or everywhere....gotta leave a little for the Old Man and teh HG

 

[jonKranked]

LA deputies accidentally shoot & kill hostage

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/11/la-deputies-shoot-wrong-man/7588921/

 

[$tinkle]

the way i read it, they purposefully shot him

 

[jonKranked]

the way i read it, they purposefully shot him

because they mistook him for the perp, not a victim.

 

[jimmydean]

the way i read it, they purposefully shot him

They shot the guy they mistook and the guy they were trying to save from the guy they mistook. Nice work.

 

[StiHacka]

Basically they just like to shoot at moving targets.

 

[$tinkle]

Basically they just like to shoot at moving targets.

i was going to fix your post w/ a "they like to shoot at black people", but seeing how these blokes were of pallor, the silver lining here is they are equal opportunity tards.

 

[jonKranked]

i was going to fix your post w/ a "they like to shoot at black people", but seeing how these blokes were of pallor, the silver lining here is they are equal opportunity tards.

it was west hollywood, so maybe they were hoping it was a gay

 

[Pesqueeb]

 

[Pesqueeb]

This weeks edition of "No sh1t Sherlock".

 

[stevew]

driving home from asheville sunday morning....two cops on the side of the road lights on at the end of an exit ramp....i slow down a little and pass by.....lead car immediately pulls out....pulls me over....roll down window...do the license registration...tells me the reason he pulled me over was not moving over a lane while they were pulled over with their lights flashing...goes back to cruiser to run the info...

15 minutes later he comes back....

gives me a warning about the not giving space....that alone was a 400+ ticket....expired registration...lowbeam bulb being out.....hands me the warning...i say thanks...then asks me to do a breathalyzer because he thought he smelled alcohol...

sure....do the breathalyzer...he looks at it...nothing...he looked disappointed...

i offered to walk the line if he wanted to make sure.....he just looked at me...said no.....have a nice rest of the morning.

kind of a dick move....but i did get a pass on what i'm sure would have been about a 700+ dollar ticket after court.

 

[JohnE]

Isn't there some sort of "protocol" for "Old lady with a car full of kids"? Jesus.

Yes. Its called common sense. Oh boy I cant wait to go back to this world. Not. Dropping papers as soon as I hit the States...

 

[jimmydean]

This weeks edition of "No sh1t Sherlock".

Why did they give me a gun if not to shoot people with?

 

[$tinkle]

i blame hank

 

[stevew]

 

[jimmydean]

NYPD tries to change its image with disastrous results.

The New York City Police Department on Tuesday asked folks on Twitter to post photos with its officers, using the hashtag #myNYPD.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/22/tech/nypd-twitter-fail/index.html

 

[rockofullr]

http://cleveland.cbslocal.com/2014/04/10/vacationing-family-pulled-over-handcuffed-at-gunpoint-by-air-force-base-security/

"AF security forces" - you say? sounds about right. jackholes.

“My son doesn’t trust police officers now,” Wendy Hill said. “He views them as the bad guy.”

Another member of the club!

 

[rockofullr]

This website is kindof a crazy libertarian type thing but the point is valid.

http://freedomfromgovernment.us/your-license-plate-is-scanned-tracked-and-logged-how-much-more-will-you-take/

 

[$tinkle]

This website is kindof a crazy libertarian type thing but the point is valid.

http://freedomfromgovernment.us/your-license-plate-is-scanned-tracked-and-logged-how-much-more-will-you-take/

what's the "point"? that cops are just another googlemap car?

 

[rockofullr]

No

The point is that the police are essentially conducting a surveillance operation against every person in their patrol area. Making detailed records of innocent citizens movements and activities.

That doesn't bother you?

 

[$tinkle]

surveillance is active
this is passive

there is no such thing as "passive surveillance"

do googlemap cars bother you?

 

[JohnE]

I waved my dick at a Google map car once. I was kinda drunk. Showed him my ass too. Dont think it made the cut for the address tho...

 

[the law]

surveillance is active
this is passive

there is no such thing as "passive surveillance"

do googlemap cars bother you?

There is no "passive" recording.

 

[rockofullr]

surveillance is active
this is passive

there is no such thing as "passive surveillance"

do googlemap cars bother you?

First I've never seen a google maps vehicle, but I see the popo every day.

Second google maps makes an effort to maintain peoples privacy by blurring peoples faces and such.

Third Google maps is not trying to incriminate me.

Fourth Google maps is not logging and compiling my activities.

There is no "passive" recording.

It's definitely not passive when you are compiling a database of where I go. That's what you do to someone under investigation for a crime.

 

[$tinkle]

There is no "passive" recording.

sure there is; what do you think googlestreet view is?

First I've never seen a google maps vehicle, but I see the popo every day.

Second google maps makes an effort to maintain peoples privacy by blurring peoples faces and such.

Third Google maps is not trying to incriminate me.

Fourth Google maps is not logging and compiling my activities.

It's definitely not passive when you are compiling a database of where I go. That's what you do to someone under investigation for a crime.

1: so...
2: it's their choice; they are not compelled
3: nor are the popo (just as long as you're not doing anything untoward)
4: so...

the only thing i find objectionable (not personally, but for society as a whole) is recording/documenting while on private property; i.e., your house. public is public, however