FIrst time around wasnt them. First time around was Revolts and that was Pacific. Same peopel who f#cked Kevin over the Revolts.
But the devil is in the detail.besides it being carbon (and some hardware tweaks,) it looks almost identical to the last one
Are you sure it was Pacific? They make a ton of other frames for companies like Banshee, Canfield, Niner, Bergamont and none of them have had such problems. My legend is perfectly aligned and the build quality is mint. Im suprised you claim it was pacific.FIrst time around wasnt them. First time around was Revolts and that was Pacific. Same peopel who f#cked Kevin over the Revolts.
It was Pacific. They messed Banshee around a LOT with the Legends too, fortunately nowhere near as badly as Evil copped it. The production frames became available in April last year, it would have been a year or more earlier if the factory had been making stuff when it said it would - I've been talking to Keith since late 2007 (yes that's almost four years ago now) for a MK1 frame that was originally meant to be available in Jan/Feb 08, got delivered in November 08, then a production frame that was meant to be available in July 09 originally, but didn't ship until April 2010! The Mk1s had some pretty messy parts on em, hell even the production Mk2s have had their (fortunately very minor) issues - the two faces of my upper shock mount weren't parallel (required filing out, fortunately easy to do and hasn't caused any issues) and the machining around the inside of that whole shock canoe is pretty messy. The bikes are great and the vast majority of the manufacturing on the Mk2 I'm impressed with (super nice welds and stuff) but they do have their issues for sure. Never had issues with alignment on either frame fortunately but the finish quality can definitely stand to be improved - so can the 10 month bulls**t period on Pacific's lead times.Are you sure it was Pacific? They make a ton of other frames for companies like Banshee, Canfield, Niner, Bergamont and none of them have had such problems. My legend is perfectly aligned and the build quality is mint. Im suprised you claim it was pacific.
btw. I love the change. Now I really want to test ride an evil
you can get a halleluja for "made with brain engaged"Can I get a hallelujah for made in TW!
Because non TW factories never **** upCan I get a hallelujah for made in TW!
but at the end of the day they're ultimately the ones that have to manufacture the frames to specWhat the factory is capable of is only part of the equation.. there are so many other variables that come into play..
Everybody makes mistakes, but if a bike company just has to go down to the shop and weld some more frames it wouldn't happen that customers have to wait forever to get warranty replacements.Because non TW factories never **** up
Yeah because its that simple. I walk 5m and weld my frames... Tubes also come from tw so what if a company is out of tubes? They still have to wait.Everybody makes mistakes, but if a bike company just has to go down to the shop and weld some more frames it wouldn't happen that customers have to wait forever to get warranty replacements.
True, but at the same time it's naive to think that you can just Alibaba dot com a complex mechanical assembly like a downhill bike.but at the end of the day they're ultimately the ones that have to manufacture the frames to spec
Three points... a) evil is carbon, and carbon is sexy. b) i think the devinci is cool too. c) just because i drool over a bike aesthetically, doesn't mean i would buy one. in fact, for various reasons i would buy neither of the above mentioned bikes, even if they were offered to me at stupidly low prices.So question...why are people so hard gay for the evil, but not nearly as moist over the devinci?
I like them both too. I had a Revolt and to this day I like the way it rode better than any other DH bike I have had. So if the carbon shaves a good chunk of weight (which I have no doubt it will) and the ride quality is similar to the Revolt, then it will be a killer bike in my mind. I just recently got a new Wilson and I am really digging it, but I need to get more time on it to compare it to the other bikes I have had.So question...why are people so hard gay for the evil, but not nearly as moist over the devinci?
however, if the spec is not very well written you'll get a whole load of parts that "meet spec" but are useless to (and/or buck) the end userbut at the end of the day they're ultimately the ones that have to manufacture the frames to spec
oh i absolutely agree, but given who was involved designing the bike, i doubt that was the case.however, if the spec is not very well written you'll get a whole load of parts that "meet spec" but are useless to (and/or buck) the end user
of course. but at the end of the day, you're paying the factory to deliver what you ordered, not a bunch of garbage.True, but at the same time it's naive to think that you can just Alibaba dot com a complex mechanical assembly like a downhill bike.
being involved in drawing up the suspension layout and actually writing up a buying spec (not generating the drawings) are very different things though.oh i absolutely agree, but given who was involved designing the bike, i doubt that was the case.
Not same!So question...why are people so hard gay for the evil, but not nearly as moist over the devinci?
agreed, but then again, consider the general engineering competency of those involved.being involved in drawing up the suspension layout and actually writing up a buying spec (not generating the drawings) are very different things though.
definitely. the sites want to keep their specs/process windows as wide as possible to minimize scrap.Some suppliers will be nice and use common sense to give what the customer (Evil in this case) wants, others will follow the spec to the letter. So if there are any allowances, they'll exploit them.
at least you're dealing with north america. i deal with china, singapore, india, and pakistan.Lets hope the Chinese guys are on the kind side this time. I work for a sizeable engineering company (considerably more complex items than DH bikes), and even we got hosed by bl**dy canadians!
Yeah I got so fed up with the hardware on my personal Revolt that I took it upon myself to redesign the I links, pivot hardware, downtube pivot, and flip chip design. Truthfully the new design is 99% the same as what I originally sketched for the Revolt. Unfortunately the engineer who designed the Revolt did not agree with my ideas and went a different direction. Now the I links have been replaced with double shear H links, I sourced custom spherical bearings from my fiends at Enduro, and the downtube pivot now passes directly through the frame with the bearings in the Delta links themselves. The Undead pivots are simpler, lighter, and significantly more robust than the Revolt's pivotsnice to see they finally changed the DELTA linkage and its connecting parts
It looks like they have tweaked the shock actuation too... it's not floating any longer. Can't really see from the pic but sounds like the bottom shock mount is on the front triangle and not the rear triangle.
Looks nice though. I'm kind of sad that my Revolt doesn't have an issue with it!
Actually, the original design for the Revolt was non-floating, and all of the trail and all mountain bikes have been non-floating. The Revolt ended up becoming a floating shock bike because of a clearance issue with the rear shock pivot and the swingarm crossbrace. Ultimately it could have gone either way on the Revolt.aesthetically, its pretty similar though. getting rid of the floating shock is a good idea IMO since alignment issues wont be as big of a concern.
So yeah, in addition to the flip chips, links, pivot re-engineering, lobbying for features like removable ISCG05 tabs, I did the baseline and flipped geometry, as well as acted as a sounding board during the industrial design and engineering process.beats the sh!t outa me. i only stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
i wonder if Mr. DW had any hand in redesigning the setup.
It changes nothing with the leverage ratio and anyone who tells you differently is either blatantly lying to you to sell more bikes or doesn't know what they are talking about.how does having a non-floating shock affect the behavior of the delta-link? I thought that the whole system was kinda dependent on that to achieve what DW wanted to...
Pretty much nailed it, see above. Really, if anything, the floating design was made to do what the fixed design already did if you look at it from a historical standpoint.It's still a Delta link and it's still DW's design, the floater didn't do anything magic except that it gave DW the effective spring curve (leverage curve if you prefer) through the travel thathe was looking for. I understand that they were able to come up with a design that did the same thing without floating which improves the unsprung mass.
I don't know what's up at your local shop but Devinci is selling Wilsons as fast as they make them, so that's about that.
So question...why are people so hard gay for the evil, but not nearly as moist over the devinci?
Second, integrated fork bumpers are nothing new. FTW had them on the Sinister R9.
Just curious as to why people are so hot and bothered by a bike that's similar to other things on the market but is brought by a company that essentially failed the first time around. Do we want this? Do we need it? Is the DH community that big?
Just wanted to see this repeated for truth.Yes, unsprung mass is lower on the non-floating shock, and there was literally ZERO difference between the leverage ratio on the original Revolt fixed design and the production Revolt floating design.
...
It changes nothing with the leverage ratio and anyone who tells you differently is either blatantly lying to you to sell more bikes or doesn't know what they are talking about.
first off, thanks for being so candid about the hardware situation. i remember talking to you at one point about how the final production hardware was not your original design. the new H-links and the new flip chips do look fantastic and really wish that did make the final design on the Revolt.Yeah I got so fed up with the hardware on my personal Revolt that I took it upon myself to redesign the I links, pivot hardware, downtube pivot, and flip chip design. Truthfully the new design is 99% the same as what I originally sketched for the Revolt. Unfortunately the engineer who designed the Revolt did not agree with my ideas and went a different direction. Now the I links have been replaced with double shear H links, I sourced custom spherical bearings from my fiends at Enduro, and the downtube pivot now passes directly through the frame with the bearings in the Delta links themselves. The Undead pivots are simpler, lighter, and significantly more robust than the Revolt's pivots
Also, the flip chips now retain their originally intended function. They key into the frame with a figure 8 shape, and also pick up bosses in the frame. The bolts really just hold them onto the swingarm, they shouldn't take any shear force really.
That goes without saying, but again common due diligence pays off in preventing these issues from occurring. It's just part of the game when you do stuff overseas. As you've statedof course. but at the end of the day, you're paying the factory to deliver what you ordered, not a bunch of garbage.
and I can imagine what it's like. I deal with manufacturing of relatively simple items (compared to a DH bike) all of the AP region. When it comes to validating processes and getting everything right so they can go into production, you basically have to hold their hand the entire way.
Also, as pointed out by dw, he provided the suspension platform and sketches and it doesn't sound like he was necessarily happy with some of the engineers execution of his design. Based on the deliverables it's entirely fair to question the business and engineering competency of those involved (not dw's). Same goes with the Pacific factory which seems to be underwhelming in their own ability to provide management and auditing for oversea clients. The whole story reminds of an Alibaba dot com story gone wrong.you basically have to hold their hand the entire way.
yea i wasn't sure how involved he was in the process, or how many other engineers were involved with the designing of the frame. Was just giving them the benefit of the doubt.Also, as pointed out by dw, he provided the suspension platform and sketches and it doesn't sound like he was necessarily happy with some of the engineers execution of his design. Based on the deliverables it's entirely fair to question the business and engineering competency of those involved (not dw's). Same goes with the Pacific factory which seems to be underwhelming in their own ability to provide management and auditing for oversea clients. The whole story reminds of an Alibaba dot com story gone wrong.
Luckily the business venture is still going and I'm sure it was quite the learning exercise for some of those involved which should translate to better execution. However, it does suck that the exercise involved paying customers. I say best of luck to them since you can never have too many people in the dh game.
Talking with Chris/Lance Canfield and Kevin that has been the major contention that you have to basically do that.When it comes to validating processes and getting everything right so they can go into production, you basically have to hold their hand the entire way.
yea, its not just the bike industry, its any manufacturing over there.Talking with Chris/Lance Canfield and Kevin that has been the major contention that you have to basically do that.
then factor in the 11-13 hour time zone difference, and things take FOR-EV-ER.Managing the production is as, if not more important than the design..
Designing a product within the limitations of the tooling available/willing to pay for is also a fun game..
Rushing development and perfecting production takes too much time as we need the product to market now!
Expecting CAD drawings to be made to the perfection first go is never going to happen..
Not implying that anything particularly applys to Evil... Its just an Funking mind field to producing a mountain bike frame - unless you have been in the shoes of managing a production you may not understand why things turn out the way they do.
I'm not saying they're the same, rather that, aesthetically, they're probably two of the most similar DH frames on the market.Not same!
But, I'm not sure why people are so "hard gay" for the evil. I personally don't find this very appealing from a purely perfectionist aesthetic point of view:
Glad to hear that devinci is selling those bikes. That frame is near the top of my list, should I get the cash, of new bikes. Love the split pivot, love the packaging, love the made in North Americaness.I don't know what's up at your local shop but Devinci is selling Wilsons as fast as they make them, so that's about that.
Fork bumpers, mountain cycle had them in the 90s, why don't all mountain bikes have them now? Seems elementary to me.
I'm not going to get into a discussion about Evil "failing the first time around" as you put it, but Kevin has taken a company that was wildly successful and innovative with jumping a street bikes, turned it into an international brand producing some of the most sought after racing equipment in the market, weathered a huge failure from his only supply channel, and bounced back undeterred to make the products that he dreams about, all the while working to make good on the promises he's made to his customers and supporters. If that's a failure then I don't understand the definition. That's all I have to say on the matter.
Dave
Freudian slip??? I smell another carbon evil...There is one really good reason why we went back to non-floating on the Uprising.
I absolutely LOVE the idea of another north american bike company. My reasons for not buying are completely personal--nothing wrong with the bike. I wouldn't buy one for reasons including the concentric pivot (again, nothing wrong, just not my cup of tea in a design), shock placement, tube design and there is something about its lines that just seem a little "off" to me. Again, I am not bashing the bike; I love what it represents and I have heard nothing but positive things about it.... Its just not for me.I am curious about zdubyadubya's last comment though. I can definitely understand the apprehension about the Evil based on their track record, but what makes you say that about the Devinci?