it seems cheap when compared to the $2700 grinder he's referencing.You consider $250 for a hand grinder cheap?
it seems cheap when compared to the $2700 grinder he's referencing.You consider $250 for a hand grinder cheap?
Canada's capital!Where do you live that you can't have better coffee? Here basically every coffee place has a Mahlkonig EK43 + Nuova Simonelli Mythos for Espresso.
Also a cheap alternative to expensive grinders is buying the commendante hand grinder. Some people claim it grinds on par with ek43 while being reasonably priced plus it doesn't take so much space.
On the bright side I've got a limited ed anaerobic fermentation natural coffee which is a rare mix. Tastes like strawberries.
I thought speciality coffee is everywhere (except France and Italy lol) given that you can find speciality coffee shops even in IndonesiaCanada's capital!
It's not so much that we don't have access to the high-end machinery or beans, it's more that there isn't much of a coffee culture here. People here tend to prefer swill that they have to mask with milk and sugar (otherwise known as Tim Hortons).
For sure there are "specialty" (3rd wave?) coffee shops. But only a handful (hence the 5 mentioned in my OP).I thought speciality coffee is everywhere (except France and Italy lol) given that you can find speciality coffee shops even in Indonesia
btw. Seriously consider commendante. It's awesome.
That's the coffee culture in every city though. Even in Berlin, Oslo or Amsterdam there are more chain stores and most people don't know shit about speciality/3rd weave. Though I get the culture is smaller where you live.For sure there are "specialty" (3rd wave?) coffee shops. But only a handful (hence the 5 mentioned in my OP).
The pervasive coffee culture here (and in the US too I suspect) is that coffee is supposed to be hot, strong, and sweetened with milk and sugar. The kind you get at Tim Hortons (Dunkin' Donuts in the US), McDonalds, or even at Starbucks. If you ask someone to "go for a coffee" that's what the average person will think of.
The notion of "terroir", different methods of processing the beans, roasting them, and preparing the coffee isn't widely held. And that's fine, IMO. For me, I treat coffee like wine and beer in that where it comes from, who makes it and how, matters. Knowing that adds to my enjoyment. It also allowed me to discover new things. But I get that not everyone is into it.
A few years back I was riding motorbikes in Thailand up near the Burmese border high in the mountains. Real jungle stuff with monkeys attacking us at waterfalls, buying fuel for the motorbikes at roadside stands selling old wine bottles full of gas and basically remote as hell stuff. But somehow nearly everyone of the little towns and villages we went to had a full boutique coffee establishment with amazing quality and a selection of beans and whatnot that would compare to the stuff I've seen in London and LA.given that you can find speciality coffee shops even in Indonesia
I'd not exactly compare it since the roasters there mostly use local coffee and coffee form the region is a bit dominated by the volcanic soil. But yeah the region went hard into speciality. Outside of TW, China and Japan they probably still need better roasters but it's growing fast.A few years back I was riding motorbikes in Thailand up near the Burmese border high in the mountains. Real jungle stuff with monkeys attacking us at waterfalls, buying fuel for the motorbikes at roadside stands selling old wine bottles full of gas and basically remote as hell stuff. But somehow nearly everyone of the little towns and villages we went to had a full boutique coffee establishment with amazing quality and a selection of beans and whatnot that would compare to the stuff I've seen in London and LA.
TBH. My coffee could have no caffeine.I like my coffee, hot black and strong enough to keep me up all night.
And it's a 3-seater. It's about the most genius driving position ever for that kind of car. TNT.That F1 still looks so damn good.
great now i'm picturing mr bean hooning around the english countrysideI always like that Rowan Atkinson used to drive his, I knew he'd crashed it once, didn't know about the second time.
Ouch at a ~$1.3m insurance claim, but not a bad profit selling the car for ~$10m.
Rowan Atkinson sells McLaren F1 he crashed twice
Mr Bean star sells supercar to Briton for undisclosed amount after putting it on market for £8million with specialist car dealer Taylor and Crawleywww.telegraph.co.uk
Supposedly he's a good driver and has a great car collection. I'm still surprised how idiotically rich he got off Mr. Bean and Blackaddergreat now i'm picturing mr bean hooning around the english countryside
Bay area is San Francisco Bay area. Washington sounds cool thoughI'm down in Bellvue next week for a conference and I want to ride my bike. That's going to be a bitch for a few days. Luckily I booked the weekend in Issaquah.
The best car ever made......That F1 still looks so damn good.
Exactly that. Also $2700 for an EK43? Prices went down. it used to be easily 500$ more.it seems cheap when compared to the $2700 grinder he's referencing.
Technically I agree but I still prefer the old 70s 240z and old Mazda RXes (pre Rx7) or an Aston Martin Lagonda for how strange it looks.The best car ever made......
I still remember being baffeled when iditos were ranting about the bloated slower accelerating ill handling veyrons, touting it as the new king, as it does a better impression of a land speed car, a poor impression at that.The best car ever made......
I still remember being baffeled when iditos were ranting about the bloated slower accelerating ill handling veyrons, touting it as the new king, as it does a better impression of a land speed car, a poor impression at that.
F1 = 110.2 hp / literI am 99% positive that the F1 had the highest HP motor that was Naturally Aspirated ever put into a road car. Not to mention it weighs 1500lbs less than most of those "HYPERCARS"....
F1 = 110.2 hp / liter
My Civic with 2003 K20a Type R = 110.5hp / litre when it was stock.
458 Speciale = 132.7 hp / liter (Highest to date for a production car that I could find)
The F1's BMW is an impressive lump, and still decent but it is a few places down the list. There are quite a few others between the Ferrari and the F1 including more Ferrari, Porsche, Lambo, and another Honda (S2000 is 120hp/l) to name a few.
It may have been able to make more than 700hp. But the biggest thing is it's not over cammed so it makes a decent amount of torque. The motor in my previous Honda Accord made 305hp ( J series v6) we tuned it to 345 and put it in my buddies Acura NSX when his v6 was given him issues.They claimed 650 HP many broke 700HP. Was there ever a Honda making over 300HP without forced induction? Thats is the thing its a 700HP motor. No turbo or supercharger and it rolls at 7K RPM. Hell the one that won Le Mans was almost a stock F1...
A Lotus Evora with a supercharger might come close. Its 2500lbs like the F1 and 350hp N/A it's a bit longer and a better roads car.I'm with ianjenn/Jm/englert: the best road supercar was done and yet to return, in '92 (or '95 LM) with the McLaren F1.
There's a lot of heavy modern non-alternatives, a few lighter ones without a roof for those who don't want to live beyond the first crash, and even a bunch of poser fake McLarens for rich people (cough Gwin) since Gordon Murray left. But for the kind of purist who wants ~1000kg and the linearity and response of an N/A V12 but also 3 seats and a roof, there's nothing else.
I've mentioned it before but the wiki page on it is one of my favourites:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_F1
Particularly the suspension / kinematics parts
The NSX at 1300-1400kg (or 1700kg for the new one) isn't remotely in the same league.
An Elise or Exige is probably a valid poor man's alternative, though questionable in a crash.
I think the spiritual successor to the F1 will either come (again) from Gordon Murray, or from another clever guy who happens to be one of his old customers.
I'm with ianjenn/Jm/englert: the best road supercar was done and yet to return, in '92 (or '95 LM) with the McLaren F1.
There's a lot of heavy modern non-alternatives, a few lighter ones without a roof for those who don't want to live beyond the first crash, and even a bunch of poser fake McLarens for rich people (cough Gwin) since Gordon Murray left. But for the kind of purist who wants ~1000kg and the linearity and response of an N/A V12 but also 3 seats and a roof, there's nothing else.
I've mentioned it before but the wiki page on it is one of my favourites:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_F1
Particularly the suspension / kinematics parts
The NSX at 1300-1400kg (or 1700kg for the new one) isn't remotely in the same league.
An Elise or Exige is probably a valid poor man's alternative, though questionable in a crash.
I think the spiritual successor to the F1 will either come (again) from Gordon Murray, or from another clever guy who happens to be one of his old customers.
That wasn't in Hp/Liter but in pure HP.F1 = 110.2 hp / liter
My Civic with 2003 K20a Type R = 110.5hp / litre when it was stock.
458 Speciale = 132.7 hp / liter (Highest to date for a production car that I could find)
The F1's BMW is an impressive lump, and still decent but it is a few places down the list. There are quite a few others between the Ferrari and the F1 including more Ferrari, Porsche, Lambo, and another Honda (S2000 is 120hp/l) to name a few.
What about Koenigsegg 1:1? Though I've heard mixed things about their handling and F1 seemed like a complete package not a car chasing speed records.I'm with ianjenn/Jm/englert: the best road supercar was done and yet to return, in '92 (or '95 LM) with the McLaren F1.
There's a lot of heavy modern non-alternatives, a few lighter ones without a roof for those who don't want to live beyond the first crash, and even a bunch of poser fake McLarens for rich people (cough Gwin) since Gordon Murray left. But for the kind of purist who wants ~1000kg and the linearity and response of an N/A V12 but also 3 seats and a roof, there's nothing else.
I've mentioned it before but the wiki page on it is one of my favourites:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_F1
Particularly the suspension / kinematics parts
The NSX at 1300-1400kg (or 1700kg for the new one) isn't remotely in the same league.
An Elise or Exige is probably a valid poor man's alternative, though questionable in a crash.
I think the spiritual successor to the F1 will either come (again) from Gordon Murray, or from another clever guy who happens to be one of his old customers.
The difference between it and F1 is that's its a race car, F1 is not. There are many road legal race cars that get great results but they are less refined than F1s
Welcome to the new Ultima RS
Ultima Sports Ltd has returned to the throne to push the Ultima legacy to its highest point ever. The new Ultima RS flagship model is a supercar that’s overwhelmingly capable, delivering the icon’s fastest, most sophisticated, most stylish and most advanced performance to date. Drivers, hail the...www.ultimasports.co.uk
View attachment 138360
The ULTIMA is basically a Tube Framed race car. Weighs 2100lbs and has motor options from 500-1200HP. You can get this delivered for $150,000 with serious HP numbers. Or go less and get it under $90K. This is the best preformance option out there. Those world records are from the old model BTW.
If I'm not mistaken there's a few that have beaten it. The new Ferrari Superfast has some preposterous amount of NA power, like 790 or something.I am 99% positive that the F1 had the highest HP motor that was Naturally Aspirated ever put into a road car. Not to mention it weighs 1500lbs less than most of those "HYPERCARS"....
Yeah but unless you're a race car driver I don't think that kind of performance makes sense. For a weekend warrior, it's better to have a weaker car that still has great handling. A tuned Corolla AE86, MR2, S2000, Miata, LS Swapped RX7 since it's lighter than 2JZ and RB (or if you hate yourself and your wallet keep your rotary for the amazing sound), e30.Yeah that ULTIMA would be a stiff road car. No ABS, Traction or other BS so you have to be able to drive. I really want one of these. Its a BackDraft Racing Shelby. 485-885 HP they weigh 2100LBS. They are 1' longer and a bit wider than Original.
1965 Backdraft Racing Roadster For Sale
Buy this 1965 Backdraft Racing Roadster For Sale on duPont REGISTRY. Click to view Photos, Price, Specs and learn more about this 1965 Backdraft Racing Roadster For Sale.www.dupontregistry.com
I have a '91 318is It's slow but fun at the track, and my bike fits in the truck with wheels off.Yeah but unless you're a race car driver I don't think that kind of performance makes sense. For a weekend warrior, it's better to have a weaker car that still has great handling..... e30.
The SHELBY is just bad ass. Not sure but it is supposed to handle very well. I think the 500HP would be the best bet.....Yeah but unless you're a race car driver I don't think that kind of performance makes sense. For a weekend warrior, it's better to have a weaker car that still has great handling. A tuned Corolla AE86, MR2, S2000, Miata, LS Swapped RX7 since it's lighter than 2JZ and RB (or if you hate yourself and your wallet keep your rotary for the amazing sound), e30.
Also since we've mentioned swaps this makes no sense:
Engine Swap Hero Puts a Twin-Charged 700-HP Toyota 2JZ Into a Rolls-Royce Phantom
We salute you, mysterious engine swap maestro.www.roadandtrack.com