just change the slogan to "What can brown do for the country"clancy98 said:and it reminds me of the UPS guy.
just change the slogan to "What can brown do for the country"clancy98 said:and it reminds me of the UPS guy.
Oh man, thanks for pointing out just how completely screwed the world is. Ugggg!Ridemonkey said:Many muslims would be "haves" too if their governments didn't horde their vast wealth derived from oil profits. These people should be terrorising these governments, not us.
Good God, what makes you think we have?TN said:<snip>
I think religious fundamentalism has no place in the world today, whether Christian or Islam or whatever. Haven't we evolved past this archaic way of thinking?
50? How about we say more like 500............N8 said:I think someone hasn't been paying attention to the events in the middle east over the last 50+ years....
Westy said:Unfortunately this is just a common theme of humanity. It has been going on for a very long time by a lot of different groups. McCarthism, Pol Pot, Nazis, Indian Wars...... Islamic fundamentalism is just the flavour du jour.
No, certainly no fight, but a respectful debate.jdschall said:Not to start a fight, but if these nut jobs had better living conditions, 3 squares a day, air conditioning, cable and a lawyer in the first place they wouldn't be running around blowing themselves and other up! There is nothing wrong with liberals wanting better for those less fortunate than us! It is unfortunate that it has to be after the fact... If we spent as much on helping others as we do on this damn war the world would be a hell of a lot better off!!!
That is what the world is waiting for, Bono's deep thinking on world affairs.stinkyboy said:Has Bono released a statement yet?!
so will the UK now join in on the "war against terrorism"? it's been so successful so far, and i'm sure it will get easier as time goes on.SkaredShtles said:N8s right, as frightening as that sounds.
This will probably go a *long* way to changing British public opinion on a number of fronts.
The Brits, despite their bad teeth and short stature, are a feisty lot when provoked.
narlus said:so will the UK now join in on the "war against terrorism"? it's been so successful so far, and i'm sure it will get easier as time goes on.
References?N8 said:I think it's safe to say that the "GWOT*" has prevented numerous attacks such as these...
*Global War On Terrorism
Yup. Israel has been battling since the day they *stole* all that land from the Palestinians - with the rest of the West's blessing, I might add.N8 said:The middle east has not 'evolved.' Israel has been battling it daily for since 1947. Bombing of buses and resturants are monthly occurances there.
N8 said:I think it's safe to say that the "GWOT*" has prevented numerous attacks such as these...
*Global War On Terrorism
Westy said:References?
All I know of is the Y2K pre GWOT profusely sweating terrorist nab and the dude from Chicago who wanted to build a dirty bomb. I'm sure there have been more.
Although still unresolved the only time things have been successful for either side is when they tried not killing each other. Exchanges of retaliation have done little to further either sides standing.SkaredShtles said:Yup. Israel has been battling since the day they *stole* all that land from the Palestinians - with the rest of the West's blessing, I might add.
Of course, the Palestinians had stolen the land from the Jews many years earlier.......
You get the idea. The history of this conflict is older than the hills.
narlus said:do you honestly believe that? tell me what sort of security measures would be needed to prevent another bombing of a tube station or bus? add in a suicide bomber to mix, if you must.
it's nigh bloody (pardon the bad choice of words) impossible.
I'm pretty sure they've been on board the war for awhile now.narlus said:so will the UK now join in on the "war against terrorism"? it's been so successful so far, and i'm sure it will get easier as time goes on.
Stole??? You mean were 'given' by the Brits as a result of WWII. They captured the rest when they were attacked by their neighbors.SkaredShtles said:Yup. Israel has been battling since the day they *stole* all that land from the Palestinians - with the rest of the West's blessing, I might add.
Of course, the Palestinians had stolen the land from the Jews many years earlier.......
You get the idea. The history of this conflict is older than the hills.
But we can't just say that all muslims are Anti-American terrorists wanting to die detinating a bomb somewhere... its just an extremist group of people. To quote the guy on 30Days when they did the muslim episode "You can't blame over a billion people on the actions of 5"Ridemonkey said:Many muslims would be "haves" too if their governments didn't horde their vast wealth derived from oil profits. These people should be terrorising these governments, not us.
Yeah for the most part what I've read in this thread has actually been pretty mature and thoughtful / thought provoking. I'm impressed.sirknight6 said:No, certainly no fight, but a respectful debate.
Yeah but why did these zealots declare war in the first place and why have they gathered so many supporters? That's my question. A question I think could be answered by looking at the social pressures that exist or existed in the past....as to them this is a holy war. Killing innocent victims, on purpose, does not justify any political or democratic freedoms they may have if caught....
I have to agree with you here. Unforunately I feel that it was the sin of the father (not finishing what he had started in 1991), and not the son, that really screwed us in our current efforts and liberating the Iraqi peoples. Poor boy is just playing the hand he was dealt.This war everyone is complaining about is taking considerably less lives then the dictatorship that was in place. I wonder if some people realize this war is to actually help the less fortunate.
Bottom line, it is an absolute travesty that occurred in England, and the perpetrators should be caught and hung. Liberal, moderate or conservative, we can all agree that the4 purposeful taking of innocent lives is just plain wrong.
peace
narlus said:do you honestly believe that? tell me what sort of security measures would be needed to prevent another bombing of a tube station or bus? add in a suicide bomber to mix, if you must.
it's nigh bloody (pardon the bad choice of words) impossible.
History has taught us that the only way for peoples of differing ideologies to get along is to simply get along. To respect one another's opinion and agree to disagree.Westy said:Although still unresolved the only time things have been successful for either side is when they tried not killing each other. Exchanges of retaliation have done little to further either sides standing.
SkaredShtles said:
This is a war that can't be "won" until civilization catches up with the combatants..... <sigh>
Given/stolen = semantics.N8 said:Stole??? You mean were 'given' by the Brits as a result of WWII. They captured the rest when they were attacked by their neighbors.
That's because none of us are fundamentalists. Sadly, the vast majority of the human population are reasonable people - but the fundamentalists are the ones that cause the problems.jdschall said:Yeah for the most part what I've read in this thread has actually been pretty mature and thoughtful / thought provoking. I'm impressed.
well that's good news. it would be GREAT news if there were only a "hand full" of extremists out there. unfortunately, there's a lot more, and our policy machine seems to be conducive to their growth rate.N8 said:This morning NPR reported that Scotland Yard arrested a hand full of people last year who were planning a similar attack.
The thing that makes me rather sad is that even those who study history seem to manage to repeat it.SkaredShtles said:
Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it.
Correct, but it's a whole separate topic.N8 said:Our next major concern will be a modern and very well armed China...
Well - some are arrogant enough to think that they can "do it better this time".....johnbryanpeters said:The thing that makes me rather sad is that even those who study history seem to manage to repeat it.
Which brings us back to... who was that fellow?SkaredShtles said:Well - some are arrogant enough to think that they can "do it better this time".....
Careful, there, Tex.johnbryanpeters said:Which brings us back to... who was that fellow?
Personally I'm more concerned about China having us by the economic balls. They will have no reason to use the military when all they need to do is "squeeze". The only saving grace is we too have them by the economic balls, a mexican standoff of sorts.N8 said:Our next major concern will be a modern and very well armed China...
OR not....pnj said:this thing is up to eight pages now, so it may have been mentioned already....
but..
Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050707/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_britain_explosions_1
so they knew before hand, yet didn't let any of the people know?
how nice.....
:nuts:
Israel was not warned about possible terror attacks in London before a series of blasts ripped through the city, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said Thursday.