Quantcast

Exxon profit tops $10.7 billion

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
Big oil pwnez you!


Exxon profit tops $10 billion, capping record year
Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:34 AM ET
Deepa Babington


NEW YORK (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp. <XOM.N>, the world's largest publicly traded oil company, on Monday reported a quarterly profit of $10.7 billion, capping a year of record earnings dominated by surging oil and gas prices.

The results pushed up Exxon's profit for the year to a staggering $36.13 billion -- bigger than the economies of 125 of the 184 countries ranked by the World Bank. Profit rose 42 percent from 2004.

The company and its peers have come under fire for posting billions in profit while consumers struggle with high gasoline prices. Exxon was quick to emphasize that such results would help it make long-term investments to meet energy demand.

The Irving, Texas company's fourth-quarter net income rose 27 percent, to $10.71 billion, or $1.71 a share, from $8.42 billion, or $1.30 a share, a year earlier. Revenue was just shy of $100 billion.

Excluding a special gain, the company earned $1.65 per share, handily beating the average forecast of $1.45 among analysts polled by Reuters Estimates.

"It's an exceptionally strong quarter -- they're the world's most profitable company," said Robert Lutts, president of Cabot Money Management. "It could raise eyebrows among some, but they're doing their job."

Exxon shares were up $1.84, or 3 percent, at $63.13 in late-morning trade on the New York Stock Exchange.

OIL'S RECORD RUN
Crude oil prices rose about 40 percent last year, driven up by tensions in oil-producing countries like Iran and Nigeria, hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico and tight supplies. They have been rise for four years, handing Big Oil a profit bonanza.

Natural gas prices have been on a similar tear, nearly doubling last year on the futures market thanks to supply disruptions and higher demand.

Earnings at Exxon's exploration and production division rose 44 percent to $7.04 billion. Refining and marketing operations posted a marginal rise in profit as the impact of the hurricanes offset a boost from higher refining and marketing margins.

Still, Exxon's results showed evidence of some of the problems affecting large oil companies, which are struggling to raise output as they grapple with maturing fields and find it harder to access vast reserves in regions like the Middle East and Russia.

Exxon said oil and gas production fell 1 percent in the quarter. However, excluding the lingering effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which slammed into the U.S. Gulf Coast last year, as well as divestment and entitlement effects, production rose 2 percent.

Analysts expect the company to report higher production this year as new projects in Russia and Africa ramp up.

"Progress on tangible growth in oil and gas production has so far been slow and, combined with the inertia associated with its sheer scale, has led the shares to lag the performance of the smaller names," Citigroup said in a research note.

Exxon used a large chunk of its growing cash pile to buy back shares -- $5 billion in the fourth quarter, the same as in the third quarter. Also, it hiked its quarterly dividend last week.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
N8 said:
The company and its peers have come under fire for posting billions in profit while consumers struggle with high gasoline prices. Exxon was quick to emphasize that such results would help it make long-term investments to meet energy demand.
I don't know about anyone else but I'm sure glad our money goes to such philanthropic companies as Exxon. Still, I always remember to give a little to Philip Morris as well to aid in their search for tobacco products that don't cause cancer.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Well, I dont know about you guys, but Im about to go and buy a hemp necklace and a fixie after reading that.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,409
22,494
Sleazattle
BurlyShirley said:
Well, I dont know about you guys, but Im about to go and buy a hemp necklace and a fixie after reading that.
Consumer whore. I'm going to go meditate with the trees and squirrels.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Westy said:
Consumer whore. I'm going to go meditate with the trees and squirrels.
You should put a clif bar wrapper over the squirrels heads.

EDIT: Tell me you read that one.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
Yup, I'm sure glad I've been investing in oil and energy for the last 4 years (the other 25% for those of you keeping count); Why let only the cronies enjoy the benefits of government corruption? We all saw it coming...
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
fluff said:
I don't know about anyone else but I'm sure glad our money goes to such philanthropic companies as Exxon. Still, I always remember to give a little to Philip Morris as well to aid in their search for tobacco products that don't cause cancer.
Yep, oil companies are bad. I drove once in the last week. How many times did you drive?

The only people I want to hear complain about oil company profits are the ones which use as little gas as possible. I actually encourage people to drive as much as possible, because I have BP stock...
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
sanjuro said:
The only people I want to hear complain about oil company profits are the ones which use as little gas as possible. I actually encourage people to drive as much as possible, because I have BP stock...
Despite being invested in oil, I think everyone has a right to complain about their current profitability... the gains are ill-gotten. If their profitability were a pure function of market dynamics and not geo-political meddling I would agree with you.
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
ohio said:
Despite being invested in oil, I think everyone has a right to complain about their current profitability... the gains are ill-gotten. If their profitability were a pure function of market dynamics and not geo-political meddling I would agree with you.
What does Exxon do to influence politics around the world?
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
sanjuro said:
What does Exxon do to influence politics around the world?
It's not Exxon alone, it's Bush and Cheney pandering to the industry as a whole. The threat to supply and the associated rising prices are a direct result of actions of the current administration. What the specific involvement of oil executives was, we'll never know, but there is no question that Bush has done everything within his power (and more than a few things outside his power) to encourage consumption while destabilizing supply. I believe he MAY too stupid to have known in advance what this would do to oil prices and profitability, but I have a hard time believing that Cheney was also ignorant to the effects. Right now the oil industry is the ONLY one benefitting from these actions. It even hurt American automakers.

Admittedly, because of our reliance on oil, it is often difficult to distinguish when oil is a private business and when protecting oil interests becomes a defense issue, but in this case we have done the exact opposite of defend our oil interests. While I don't have transcripts from private conversations in the White House, you're fooling yourself if you think that the current administration was not heavily influenced by the industry.

Here's a look at their political contributions:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/oil/overview.aspx
and Exxon specifically:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/oil/db.aspx?act=cinfo&coid=0000131174
The analysis of these contributions will vary and I'm sure The Center For Public Integrity has their biases, but the numbers are shown without commentary and are from public record.

Top campaign finance recipients (Exxon):
National Republican Party Committees $1,112,045
National Democratic Party Committees $167,350
President George W Bush (R) $91,322
Rep Anne Meagher Northup (R-KY) $28,000
Rep Heather Ann Wilson (R-NM) $27,500
Rep Donald E Young (R-AK) $25,500
Sen John Eric Ensign (R-NV) $25,000
Sen Jim Bunning (R-KY) $21,000
Rep Donald L Sherwood (R-PA) $20,000
Sen Christopher S Bond (R-MO) $20,000
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,409
22,494
Sleazattle
Thank god we passed tax cuts for the oil companies to invest in drilling for more oil. I can't think of any other industry that is more deserving of subsidies.
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
ohio said:
It's not Exxon alone, it's Bush and Cheney pandering to the industry as a whole. The threat to supply and the associated rising prices are a direct result of actions of the current administration. What the specific involvement of oil executives was, we'll never know, but there is no question that Bush has done everything within his power (and more than a few things outside his power) to encourage consumption while destabilizing supply. I believe he MAY too stupid to have known in advance what this would do to oil prices and profitability, but I have a hard time believing that Cheney was also ignorant to the effects. Right now the oil industry is the ONLY one benefitting from these actions. It even hurt American automakers.

Admittedly, because of our reliance on oil, it is often difficult to distinguish when oil is a private business and when protecting oil interests becomes a defense issue, but in this case we have done the exact opposite of defend our oil interests. While I don't have transcripts from private conversations in the White House, you're fooling yourself if you think that the current administration was not heavily influenced by the industry.

Here's a look at their political contributions:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/oil/overview.aspx
and Exxon specifically:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/oil/db.aspx?act=cinfo&coid=0000131174
The analysis of these contributions will vary and I'm sure The Center For Public Integrity has their biases, but the numbers are shown without commentary and are from public record.

Top campaign finance recipients (Exxon):
National Republican Party Committees $1,112,045
National Democratic Party Committees $167,350
President George W Bush (R) $91,322
Rep Anne Meagher Northup (R-KY) $28,000
Rep Heather Ann Wilson (R-NM) $27,500
Rep Donald E Young (R-AK) $25,500
Sen John Eric Ensign (R-NV) $25,000
Sen Jim Bunning (R-KY) $21,000
Rep Donald L Sherwood (R-PA) $20,000
Sen Christopher S Bond (R-MO) $20,000
This is a hard one for me. I used to hear about the almighty oil companies, but considering I and many other people were laid off during the last oil bust (1999, $15 a barrel), it is hard to see it.

On the hand, Cheney and Bush are both in oil's back pocket. How much direct influence does Exxon or BP have on American politics? Well, that is hard to say, considering Cheney's energy meetings in 2000 were kept secret.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
sanjuro said:
Yep, oil companies are bad. I drove once in the last week. How many times did you drive?

The only people I want to hear complain about oil company profits are the ones which use as little gas as possible. I actually encourage people to drive as much as possible, because I have BP stock...
As you're asking I rode a motorcycle that does 80 mpg three times last week.

Happy now?