DRB said:Charlie Sheen = Changleen
Anyone seeing the similarity??
Forbiddennarlus said:
She actually put him on the curb and is on the market. This might be an opportunity to pick up a real MzN8.N8 said:oh..... oh.... OH!
Is he her daddy?
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=Denise+Richards&btnG=Search
I suddenly have a chocolate craving!:love:stevew said:Mmmmm.........chocolate.
The syphyllis he caught from Heidi Fleiss has finally made him go mad.Mackie said:
It only requires the people who are in on it to be organised.luelling said:He prolly watched this:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=911+loose+change
I had a friend send that to me....interesting, but a big conspiracy requires our government to be organized and secretive and anyone who works for the government knows they fail at both.
This isn't Isreal bro...we don't have CIA death squads anymore. Our government has been that focused and organized since right after WWII. Lower down people only carry out orders from above...it takes people above to hand em out. I'm saying there isn't enough secrecy and someone would have leaked. The information would have changed hands too many timesChangleen said:It only requires the people who are in on it to be organised.
Well, since that's such a great view of it, I'm sure there's a ton we can get from that.Changleen said:Explain this then:
rooftest said:Well, since that's such a great view of it, I'm sure there's a ton we can get from that. :rolleyes
I'm going to go with the same reason towers 1 and 2 went - heat from the fire weakened the steel frame enough that it finally collapsed.
Either that or it was Bush in the basement with a candle.
Going to get my tinfoil hat...
Trust by no means am I trying to advocate the conspiracy theory, but it does look like demolition was executed in that building. The video that I posted is semi convincing if you know abything about the history with the Taliban and our government. We where actually feeding the Taliban money all the way up to 1999 in hopes to build an iol pipeline through Afghanistan from the southern Russian states producing oil (and there are lots). But we gave up becuase the Taliban had such a bad rap for human rights violations.Changleen said:Explain this then:
Come into the PD forum sometime...luelling said:Trust by no means am I trying to advocate the conspiracy theory, but it does look like demolition was executed in that building. The video that I posted is semi convincing if you know abything about the history with the Taliban and our government. We where actually feeding the Taliban money all the way up to 1999 in hopes to build an iol pipeline through Afghanistan from the southern Russian states producing oil (and there are lots). But we gave up becuase the Taliban had such a bad rap for human rights violations.
I still have trouble buying into the conspiracy becuase of the lack of organization...like I said...this isn't Isreal. We don't have organized death squads....sure we have eltie special forces, but from all the evidence I've seen our CIA is incapable of such a feet. Again, this isn't the sixtys when we had a national focus of defeating communism.....we are in a national debate on weather or not its worth our time and lives (and I don't think it is) to up root ****ty dictators.
Apparantly there were explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1+2 before the planes even hit according to some eyewitnesses.rooftest said:Look at the shots of the twin towers falling - they look the same. (Planned demolition works the same way.)
So, did Bush's guys bomb the towers after the planes hit? (and they set it off with a delay to catch more firemen)
I'm gonna have to lend my hat to you guys.
The BIG theory is that they planted the munitions before hand and that the attack was planned in conjunction with Bin Laden...so when the planes hit after a period of time the demolition was detonated. One thing they don't take into account (my old man has been a pilot for 30 years professionally) is the fact that all of those planes were completely loaded with fuel. That much fuel would easily be enough to bring down several stories and then consequently topple the building (physics). The only question that remains in my mind is the Pentagon and watch the video I posted earlier about that. They make some good points.rooftest said:Look at the shots of the twin towers falling - they look the same. (Planned demolition works the same way.)
So, did Bush's guys bomb the towers after the planes hit? (and they set it off with a delay to catch more firemen)
I'm gonna have to lend my hat to you guys.
Do me a favour and have a look into Bin Laden's denial of involvement, how the tape in which he 'admits involvement' was found, and reflect on the actual neccesity of needing him at all if indeed it was a inside job of some kind.luelling said:The BIG theory is that they planted the munitions before hand and that the attack was planned in conjunction with Bin Laden...so when the planes hit after a period of time the demolition was detonated. One thing they don't take into account (my old man has been a pilot for 30 years professionally) is the fact that all of those planes were completely loaded with fuel. That much fuel would easily be enough to bring down several stories and then consequently topple the building (physics). The only question that remains in my mind is the Pentagon and watch the video I posted earlier about that. They make some good points.
You know, maybe Bush is in bed with Osama but I doubt it. Its like anything else, its just a theory...just like his presidency. I don't like Bush but we may look back (if Iraq came out well in the next 5 years) and say "****, he was a good president that was ahead of his time." I like Reagan and my mom considers him the devil that was trying to start a nuclear war. I equate this presidency to that.