now they make gravel bikes.When I found a crack in my old Turner they had a new frame on my doorstep the next day.
now they make gravel bikes.When I found a crack in my old Turner they had a new frame on my doorstep the next day.
I mean, the DW-link design could not have been cheap to use. Pivot, Ibis, and who else were also using it? It's not like they were standing out as a FS carbon manufacturer anymore. Whereas gravel bikes are an accelerating market. It makes sense. Also not many people are making Ti hardtails anymore.actually, i just visited their site. they have pivoted to making ti hardtails.
Weird, a company previously known for excellent customer service got bought out by a private equity firm and now their customer service sucks? Sounds unlikely.The more stories about SC's "customer service" I find on the interwebz these days, the more convinced I am that I will be back on the Riot sooner than later.
Are you blaming Westy for the downfall of Turner? Because it does sorta sound like it's his fault, they made rad bikes, he forced them to warranty a frame and now they make portly roadbikes. Not sure what other conclusion we're supposed to come to.now they make gravel bikes.
Also not many people are buying Ti hardtails anymore.Also not many people are making Ti hardtails anymore.
Have you ever overnight shipped a bike frame to assholeville? Shits expensive.Are you blaming Westy for the downfall of Turner? Because it does sorta sound like it's his fault, they made rad bikes, he forced them to warranty a frame and now they make portly roadbikes. Not sure what other conclusion we're supposed to come to.
They used to be one of the premier mtb brands. I never owned one, but it sure bums me out.When I broke the front triangle on my (used, out of warranty) DHR, I had a new front triangle in a few days.
Turner was a kickass company making kickass bikes in the early/mid 2000s, IMO. Kind of makes me sad to see them end up the way they did, but it's definitely not a surprise.
I always thought I was pretty quick on my Yeti then I borrowed a friend's DHR. When I realized the I couldn't brake outside of straight lines on that bike, it really changed a LOT about I rode in general. Made a huge difference when I got back onto the Yeti and had learned this new concept. That was when I very quickly bumped from expert (where I had been for 2 seasons) to semi.When I broke the front triangle on my (used, out of warranty) DHR, I had a new front triangle in a few days.
Turner was a kickass company making kickass bikes in the early/mid 2000s, IMO. Kind of makes me sad to see them end up the way they did, but it's definitely not a surprise.
I should have mentioned I broke the front triangle casing a step up with granite face landing.I always thought I was pretty quick on my Yeti then I borrowed a friend's DHR. When I realized the I couldn't brake outside of straight lines on that bike, it really changed a LOT about I rode in general. Made a huge difference when I got back onto the Yeti and had learned this new concept. That was when I very quickly bumped from expert (where I had been for 2 seasons) to semi.
[face palm]I should have mentioned I broke the front triangle casing a step up with granite face landing.
fatkidsdoingstupidthings.jpg
I'm sure I was after I realized I was spending the rest of the day in the parking lotCan we assume you were drunk too
That’s not it. It was basically all the stuff we complain about here on RM. Industry moves too fast. If you don’t have 79.5 degrees STA then f*ck you. Too many mfrs lying about their numbers. Get off my lawn type stuff, but harder and harder for a small operation of just a couple people.I mean, the DW-link design could not have been cheap to use. Pivot, Ibis, and who else were also using it? It's not like they were standing out as a FS carbon manufacturer anymore. Whereas gravel bikes are an accelerating market. It makes sense. Also not many people are making Ti hardtails anymore.
Which is a damn shame, because that was never their strength. Their stuff was seldom at the forefront of any measurable statistic, but it flat out worked and continued to do so for years after. I'd happily buy a metal RFX today if they made one.That’s not it. It was basically all the stuff we complain about here on RM. Industry moves too fast. If you don’t have 79.5 degrees STA then f*ck you. Too many mfrs lying about their numbers. Get off my lawn type stuff, but harder and harder for a small operation of just a couple people.
I'd say the adoption of carbon killed them. Doesn't take too much to changeover an aluminum setup to adopt a new hub width or geometry. But as a "high end" brand they went the way of carbon and those changes probably go deep into 6 figures for a single model of bike.Which is a damn shame, because that was never their strength. Their stuff was seldom at the forefront of any measurable statistic, but it flat out worked and continued to do so for years after. I'd happily buy a metal RFX today if they made one.
But you are right, the frenetic pace at which the industry churns through dubiously justified "standards" was impossible for them to keep up with. Throw in the transition from metal frames to carbon and they had no chance. It's impossible for a small operation like that to move the volumes required to cover tooling costs year after year.
Somehow, 3D printing needs to save the small mfrs by allowing for quickly changing the CF mold. I think there are temperature issues, so the cheap thermoplastic kind won't work for this, but there's got to be a way to harness it in this respect.Which is a damn shame, because that was never their strength. Their stuff was seldom at the forefront of any measurable statistic, but it flat out worked and continued to do so for years after. I'd happily buy a metal RFX today if they made one.
But you are right, the frenetic pace at which the industry churns through dubiously justified "standards" was impossible for them to keep up with. Throw in the transition from metal frames to carbon and they had no chance. It's impossible for a small operation like that to move the volumes required to cover tooling costs year after year.
I'm probably close to 10000 miles of riding on my 2012 bought Turner Burner, it's been well looked after and serviced during the last 8+ years of riding and there's nothing wrong with it at this point.
I bet there's not many of the current trail bikes will be as well lasting 8 years from now given the same wear and tear.
my understanding is that current 3d printing tech isn't yet suitable for production quality cf molds. you can get a few cycles of out of a mold at most, which at least works for prototyping.Somehow, 3D printing needs to save the small mfrs by allowing for quickly changing the CF mold. I think there are temperature issues, so the cheap thermoplastic kind won't work for this, but there's got to be a way to harness it in this respect.
Somehow, 3D printing needs to save the small mfrs by allowing for quickly changing the CF mold. I think there are temperature issues, so the cheap thermoplastic kind won't work for this, but there's got to be a way to harness it in this respect.