I have built several VP free's already this summer, and in my personal opinion, I would take a Bullit with a floater any day over one of those over built tanks. Too heavy, too tall, the travel doesn't sag very well, and the links are welded together (seriously, who does that?). A Bullit/floater combo is a simple durable solution that is light, flicky, and pedals great. It ain't no race bike, but it handles most sketchy situations while still being extremely versatile.lonewolfe said:I've had my eye on getting a VP Free but honestly can't afford it right now. They are awesome bikes and several of my buddies now own and love those bikes.
Salami said:I installed the Brake Therepy FB on my Bullit about 2 months ago and it has completely changed the way I feel about it. It has changed the way I ride the bike. I feel it has made me faster as I now can brake in sections of trail that I couldn't before. Instead of having to brake before the section because it was too rough I can enter it with much more speed and brake where I need to. It has improved the braking characteristics so much, that I will never buy another bike unless it can be used with a floating brake. I love mine!! :love:
Did you read lonewolfe's post?me89 said:nice i might just have to.
Hi guys, Brian from Therapy Components here. I just wanted to thank everyone for the great comments, and willingness to share them. I never get tired of hearing it!!! I consider myself very fortunate to make products that people get so pumped about!! I hope and plan to make that a habit with new products as well.bikeguy100k said:I have a Bullit with a floater. Definitely one of the best upgrades I purchased. Definitely go for it. Brake Therapy is very worth it!
Zedro, that's on the bike you designed, right? Did you ever play around with the optional pickup positions for the rod? Any noticable difference? Just curious for input "outside of Therapy"zedro said:although a completly different pivot placement for my ride, the floater is really amazing, it just keeps the rear end smooth.
We do make one for the sgs, and contrary to popular belief, it is a big improvement for these (fsr/horst link/4 bar) bikes. Our customers with these are just as enthusiastic as our Bullit customers. And once again, money back guarantee if you don't like it.me89 said:yeh man thats awsome bullit. i want a floater for my sgs now. im so jealous. (of the floater.)
I'm just curious, binary visions, have you tried one of our floaters on a horst link bike? Any floater on a horst link bike? Any floater on any bike?binary visions said:Did you read lonewolfe's post?
Buying a floater for a Horst link bike is like buying a travel upgrade kit for an Armageddon. Yeah, you can do it, and there might be a slight performance difference, but why? There's not nearly enough to justify the added weight, complexity and expense.
i didnt alter the brake arm holes but did adjust the 'slider' frame mount and did notice some slight improvement, conforming to how i predicted the changes would work (in this case, it was in improving traction for 'smooth terrain' suspension movement).shock said:Zedro, that's on the bike you designed, right? Did you ever play around with the optional pickup positions for the rod? Any noticable difference? Just curious for input "outside of Therapy"
Sounds similar to our experience on most bikes, once you get 80-90 percent of the improvement of having the floating brake, the effect is so dramatic that the remaining improvement can be subtle.zedro said:i didnt alter the brake arm holes but did adjust the 'slider' frame mount and did notice some slight improvement, conforming to how i predicted the changes would work (in this case, it was in improving traction for 'smooth terrain' suspension movement).
To be honest, i havent been paying much attention to it since i'm still playing with the shock linkage and the new DHX, and the floater is such a drastic improvement and works so well that tweeks will be tough to plan. Basically both traction and activeness are really good, and the bike stays alot more level. I dont think i'll ever run a bike without one at this point.
When i'm finally set on the suspension setup, i'll try to refine the floater setup. I dont really want to mix the changes together.
*cough* Point taken - I've never ridden a floater on a Horst link bike. However, I had back to back rides on a Bullit with your floater, and on a 2004 SGS. The suspension interaction I felt with the SGS when braking (after riding the Bullit which was, in fact, pretty cool to feel how little suspension interaction there was - and I certainly applaud the Therapy design efforts there) was so little as to be almost irrelevant to the ride.shock said:I'm just curious, binary visions, have you tried one of our floaters on a horst link bike? Any floater on a horst link bike? Any floater on any bike?
Well, that gives you more credibility than 99% of the people that have a negative comment about floaters....binary visions said:*cough* Point taken - I've never ridden a floater on a Horst link bike. However, I had back to back rides on a Bullit with your floater, and on a 2004 SGS. The suspension interaction I felt with the SGS when braking (after riding the Bullit which was, in fact, pretty cool to feel how little suspension interaction there was - and I certainly applaud the Therapy design efforts there) was so little as to be almost irrelevant to the ride.
I've had a couple rides on other various floater equipped bikes (DHS Mono for one), so I think I have a decent grasp on what neutral braking should feel like. And the SGS feels pretty close to that.
Just seems, to me, like an expensive solution to an almost non-existant problem. Do you guys keep any Horst bikes with floaters around (personal/team rides)? I see your display every year at Mt. Snow during the nationals - perhaps I could see about a ride on a floater-equipped Horst link.
Undoubtedly, and I admit I should try one before expressing a strong opinion about it. I just have a difficult time believing that eliminating the small amount of suspension interaction in a Horst link setup causes such an improvement as to justify the cost.shock said:Ok, rant out, I just want people to try it before drawing conclusions..
Dave, if he has a number 3 or 5 caliper your statement is 100% incorrect. Any other caliper number and you are correct. A #3 caliper with a Hope post mount adapter and 8" rotor will work perfectly.Your rear brake will not work with that new mount period.
hey, what kinda hub, brake, brake adapter ect. are you using here? I have a King ISO disc w/ Fun Bolts & a Hope Mono M4. Is that a King ISO w/ Fun Bolts I see here? Nice Root Beer color on the frame...
* Sorry, this is referring to the "root beer" Bullit pictured earlier... forgot to list the original posting w/ this question.
I missed the existing rotor size. If he is running a 7" rotor and the caliper is bolted to a rear IS mount with no adapters he would have a #8 caliper. A #8 caliper would not work with the floating brake unless a 9" rotor is used which won't clear the frame like you mentioned. Sounds like he is going to need to buy more parts.He was running a 180mm rotor on an IS mount (whatever Hope part that was). I dont think there is any way to get enough space to fit an adapter and only space the caliper out only 20mm).
Maybe if he could go to a 220 rotor in back, but it wont fit in that frame....
If YOU were paying attention, your answer pertaining to the caliper and adapters has been spelled out for you.If you were payin attention you would see I have an 8" rotor for this application (a 7" & a 6" also if need be) .