[jonKranked]

Now they are trying to ban birth control, calling it a "murder pill" and "chemical abortion."

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/142623/anti-choice_floridians_peddling_constitutional_amendment_to_criminalize_birth_control_pill/

 

[Andyman_1970]

Now they are trying to ban birth control, calling it a "murder pill" and "chemical abortion."

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/142623/anti-choice_floridians_peddling_constitutional_amendment_to_criminalize_birth_control_pill/

Yeah the more "hard core" Christians are anti-pill as they think it induces an abortion to prevent pregnancy...........

 

[Westy]

If there was one good thing about global warning it would be that Florida might disappear into a shallow reef. Unfortunately all those idiots will probably try moving north.

 

[ska todd]

They should also ban tissues as they directly kill millions of sperm when you mop up after pulling out. That there is mass murder. Anyone of those sperm could have tried to somehow make his way in and fertilize the egg.

-ska todd

 

[Westy]

Not fertilizing every available egg is also murder. Mandatory gang bangs for every post pubescent woman.

 

[MMike]

If there was one good thing about global warning it would be that Florida might disappear into a shallow reef. Unfortunately all those idiots will probably try moving north.

I propose a giant wall at the Mason-Dixon line.

 

[X3pilot]

I propose a giant wall at the Mason-Dixon line.

Yeah, cause there are NO idiots in PA or like say New *coughPSP* Jersey....

 

[Andyman_1970]

These are the same people that think sex is only for making babies and you shoudln't enjoy it.............too bad the Bible says otherwise............

 

[dante]

We can trade them for Austin, TX?

 

[jonKranked]

These are the same people that think sex is only for making babies and you shoudln't enjoy it.............too bad the Bible says otherwise............

The Bible™ also says that slavery is ok. I want slaves dammit!

 

[Andyman_1970]

Yeah it does..........I guess my point was they use the Bible to justify their stance on the pill, and have a rather uptight view of sex rather than understand what the Bible says on the subject and what the culture that gave us the Bible did and understood regarding sex.

 

[jonKranked]

Yeah it does..........I guess my point was they use the Bible to justify their stance on the pill, and have a rather uptight view of sex rather than understand what the Bible says on the subject and what the culture that gave us the Bible did and understood regarding sex.

Oh I absolutely agree with your point. It's silly to take every single thing the Bible™ so literally.

 

[Pesqueeb]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/U0kJHQpvgB8&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/U0kJHQpvgB8&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 

[Andyman_1970]

Oh I absolutely agree with your point. It's silly to take every single thing the Bible™ so literally.

Love the "TM"..........LOL

I don't believe it was ever intented to be taken that way.........

 

[jonKranked]

I don't believe it was ever intented to be taken that way.........

I don't think it was either. The problem is, people do take it literally.

 

[ska todd]

Yep, sorta like how they take The Constitution all literal and stuff.

-ska todd

 

[Westy]

Yep, sorta like how they take The Constitution all literal and stuff.

-ska todd

The government has no right to amputate my limbs, well maybe my legs.

 

[jonKranked]

Yep, sorta like how they take The Constitution all literal and stuff.

-ska todd

The difference is, we're still working with the original text of the constitution in its native language. The Bible has been translated many times, so information has been lost in translation, not to mention the potential for intentional mistranslation and interjection of personal prejudices by the translators.

 

[Andyman_1970]

The difference is, we're still working with the original text of the constitution in its native language.

That and the culture of the authors of the Constitution laid the foundation for the culture we have today (or at least in part were the fore runners). The culture that the Bible came out of is totally foreign than our culture today........and I would argue leaves it open for alot of misunderstandings because of that "gap".

 

[ska todd]

oops, I forgot my [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] tags.

-ska todd

 

[jonKranked]

oops, I forgot my [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] tags.

-ska todd

No, I saw them. I just take my Bible™ talk very seriously.

 

[Andyman_1970]

oops, I forgot my [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] tags.

-ska todd

Ooops sorry I didn't see them..........