Update January 2022:
Total leverage in the spreadsheet depends on both hydraulic and mechanical leverage, and mechanical leverage calculation on the spreadsheet is not accurate. You cannot accurately compare peak force between brakes using the total leverage value, it is a rough guide and only really useful to compare brakes which use the same lever/MC. In fact the mechanical leverage curve changes even based on the reach adjustment setting.
Many brakes have decreasing leverage during and beyond engagement (bad), very few brakes are designed to minimise this problem. SRAM/Avid and Trickstuff both position the main lever pivot very close to the bar to help this, and Shimano use servo wave (a leverage curve modifier).
Much has improved since 2015 when this thread was started - we now have powerful brake options and larger rotors have become mainstream. However many brakes with high peak force still have long throw, questionable reliability/durability in the long term, and cheap construction methods (soft cast alloy or plastic master cylinders, non-anodized sliding surfaces, etc). Hopefully these aspects see improvement in future.
-----------------------------
Update March 2018:
The spreadsheet now has three sheets, which can be clicked near the bottom left hand corner.
This is an open ended thread for anyone who has problems with current production brakes and wants an alternative solution. If you are 100% happy with your brakes then great, this isn't the thread for you, be happy. I think it's safe to say that every brake out there currently has notable flaws though, unlike a lot of aspects of bikes that are currently very polished in their function - like frames, suspension and drivetrains.
Braking has developed many new issues over the years. If we go back 12 years, with the Hayes HFX/Mag era we had relatively reliable hydraulic braking with modest power. Shimano extended on this with their M800/M756 brakes which were supremely reliable but also not that powerful. Many people had issues with glazing and destroying pads from having to drag them excessively.
Then we saw a big jump in power with servo wave and larger 4-pot calipers, which decreased stopping distances and glazing issues, but lever throws grew as a result of the increase in hydraulic leverage ratios on these brakes, and lever inconsistencies became a bigger issue as well. There seems to be a 50% chance that any given brake will experience lever throw fluctuations over a run, commonly reported on all the big brands like Avid/SRAM and Shimano - but not necessarily on every single brake, which makes the data very patchy. For example, Mike Levy for years raved about Shimano in his Pinkbike reviews while sometimes unfairly ripping Avid/Formula to shreds, but in reality, we were seeing numerous warranty cases with XTs leaking / fluctuating in throw / occasionally having complete MC seizures here concurrently with his raving. Now with the new M8000 and M9000 Pinkbike is reporting these problems like they are new, but in reality it was just their luck of the draw.
I think there is a common theme with problems being proportional to power, so brakes with less leverage tend to be more reliable - possibly unrelated directly, but rather because lever throw variations are much more of a problem when they happen on an M810/M820 for example (where the throw is so long that your lever engages near the grip) compared to an old Hayes brake where you had a larger safety margin.
Finally, with the switch to 650b, we've reduced stopping power by a very clean ~4%. Simple lever arm calculation here, bigger wheel = need bigger brakes, which we don't actually have.
On top of all this, an ongoing issue is that pad compound changes due to heat affecting the friction coefficient over the wear life of the pad - i.e. brand new pads start off with good bite after break-in, but then deteriorate over time as the surface hardens and experiences molecular changes. Shimanos heat-sink pad and rotor ideas are probably the only thing that actually address this issue, so points to them for that. Larger rotors also do the same thing.
So, solutions?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sjPSmOYbhjDBFxcvXVw1ufKfowEBu1AKh8sB6T8e24Y/edit#gid=0
Total leverage in the spreadsheet depends on both hydraulic and mechanical leverage, and mechanical leverage calculation on the spreadsheet is not accurate. You cannot accurately compare peak force between brakes using the total leverage value, it is a rough guide and only really useful to compare brakes which use the same lever/MC. In fact the mechanical leverage curve changes even based on the reach adjustment setting.
Many brakes have decreasing leverage during and beyond engagement (bad), very few brakes are designed to minimise this problem. SRAM/Avid and Trickstuff both position the main lever pivot very close to the bar to help this, and Shimano use servo wave (a leverage curve modifier).
Much has improved since 2015 when this thread was started - we now have powerful brake options and larger rotors have become mainstream. However many brakes with high peak force still have long throw, questionable reliability/durability in the long term, and cheap construction methods (soft cast alloy or plastic master cylinders, non-anodized sliding surfaces, etc). Hopefully these aspects see improvement in future.
-----------------------------
Update March 2018:
The spreadsheet now has three sheets, which can be clicked near the bottom left hand corner.
- The first is a work in progress for hydraulic + mechanical leverage (totals have only been calculated for a few brakes so far, please measure your brakes and contribute)
- The second gives fluid recommendations specific to MTB, for both DOT (glycol) and oil (mineral, synthetic)
- The third is a weight database, currently just for rotors, but in future for other brake parts
This is an open ended thread for anyone who has problems with current production brakes and wants an alternative solution. If you are 100% happy with your brakes then great, this isn't the thread for you, be happy. I think it's safe to say that every brake out there currently has notable flaws though, unlike a lot of aspects of bikes that are currently very polished in their function - like frames, suspension and drivetrains.
Braking has developed many new issues over the years. If we go back 12 years, with the Hayes HFX/Mag era we had relatively reliable hydraulic braking with modest power. Shimano extended on this with their M800/M756 brakes which were supremely reliable but also not that powerful. Many people had issues with glazing and destroying pads from having to drag them excessively.
Then we saw a big jump in power with servo wave and larger 4-pot calipers, which decreased stopping distances and glazing issues, but lever throws grew as a result of the increase in hydraulic leverage ratios on these brakes, and lever inconsistencies became a bigger issue as well. There seems to be a 50% chance that any given brake will experience lever throw fluctuations over a run, commonly reported on all the big brands like Avid/SRAM and Shimano - but not necessarily on every single brake, which makes the data very patchy. For example, Mike Levy for years raved about Shimano in his Pinkbike reviews while sometimes unfairly ripping Avid/Formula to shreds, but in reality, we were seeing numerous warranty cases with XTs leaking / fluctuating in throw / occasionally having complete MC seizures here concurrently with his raving. Now with the new M8000 and M9000 Pinkbike is reporting these problems like they are new, but in reality it was just their luck of the draw.
I think there is a common theme with problems being proportional to power, so brakes with less leverage tend to be more reliable - possibly unrelated directly, but rather because lever throw variations are much more of a problem when they happen on an M810/M820 for example (where the throw is so long that your lever engages near the grip) compared to an old Hayes brake where you had a larger safety margin.
Finally, with the switch to 650b, we've reduced stopping power by a very clean ~4%. Simple lever arm calculation here, bigger wheel = need bigger brakes, which we don't actually have.
On top of all this, an ongoing issue is that pad compound changes due to heat affecting the friction coefficient over the wear life of the pad - i.e. brand new pads start off with good bite after break-in, but then deteriorate over time as the surface hardens and experiences molecular changes. Shimanos heat-sink pad and rotor ideas are probably the only thing that actually address this issue, so points to them for that. Larger rotors also do the same thing.
So, solutions?
- In my book the best solution is a bigger rotor, but these died out due to lack of popularity. The key benefit is that they increase braking force "cleanly" - i.e. without any cost in lever feel like servo wave, or lever throw distance like mechanical/hydraulic leverage, or reliability. Both Hope and Formula offered 220/225mm options, with Formula being quite good with rotor weight optimisation so a 220 option from them would have been quite viable. Are there any good options left for this?
- Lever throw fluctuation - what actually causes this, is it heat driven from fluid expansion, or more likely to be from seal expansion? I feel the fluids aren't the problem. I suspect the problem may be caused at the caliper end, thus being a fault of the caliper - since the lever doesn't see force or temperature fluctuations under constant deceleration - but am open to correction.
- Excessive lever free stroke - this is purely a function of hydraulic and mechanical leverage, which is why brakes like the M820 have mountains of power but awful stroke distance. Servo-wave helps, but I think in this case they should have changed the leverage curve a bit to cut some stroke. Free stroke is also wasted by internal lever design, particularly lever stroke distance between u-cup seal meeting and crossing the primary port. I've found this is internally modifiable on most levers with careful thought, and something that can also change with lever age/wear - which has been part of the reason I've used my particular brake set very happily for 5 years now. The reason for this thread is that I want more power without extending stroke.
- I see an ideal solution as finding a combination of lever and caliper that offers good power and free stroke while eliminating individual products (levers and calipers separately, not entire brakes) that cause dynamic stroke variations - and possibly bringing some larger rotor options into the mix, so that the increase in power can be shared between the lever's leverage (= more stroke, unavoidable), and the caliper's leverage (clean).
- I've been putting together a database of lever and caliper piston sizes along with resultant hydraulic leverage, perhaps people would be willing to take measurements of their brake levers so we could add mechanical leverage into the equation and have a good bank of mix/match options.
- I know I haven't mentioned every brand here but I've tried pretty much everything. If simply buying Hope/Formula/Magura actually fixed these issues I'd have just done it, reality is everyone has their flaws, but by opening up some compatibility options, it might be possible to generate better optimisations. Obviously DOT and Mineral need to stay with their own kind, unless seals are standard sizes that can be changed.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sjPSmOYbhjDBFxcvXVw1ufKfowEBu1AKh8sB6T8e24Y/edit#gid=0