I have this public speaking class this semester and of course you know how leftish universities are these days, but the book for the class has got me really wondering how some people even take themselves seriously. The book is talking about how you should actively listen to another person's point of view no matter what it is in order to find a real "truth" someday down the line, cause selective listening inhibits that or something. Well, just off to the left of the paragraph about this there's a picture of some dude holding a sign that says "AIDS cures FAGS" and the caption reads: "Having an open mind does not mean listening to hateful bigotry"
And the instructor buys right in with a story about how a leader of the KKK wanted to speak at a University in Indiana or something and how it was OK that he was denied because it was for the common good or something. So, I guess my question is: Who is this decider of common good? AND should we not seriously give consideration to all ideas regardless of whether they promote something we're strongly against? In order to get the best view from all angles? Or what's the alternative? To selectively hear and totally disregard what the entire course is supposed to be about?
Whatcha think?
And the instructor buys right in with a story about how a leader of the KKK wanted to speak at a University in Indiana or something and how it was OK that he was denied because it was for the common good or something. So, I guess my question is: Who is this decider of common good? AND should we not seriously give consideration to all ideas regardless of whether they promote something we're strongly against? In order to get the best view from all angles? Or what's the alternative? To selectively hear and totally disregard what the entire course is supposed to be about?
Whatcha think?