Quantcast

Fusion Reactors: China Steps It Up!

Transcend

My Nuts Are Flat
Apr 18, 2002
18,040
3
Towing the party line.
blue said:
I apologize for the drunken post, but China is still very rural and un-industrialized. It will take between 25-50 years (REALLY FAST) at the current growth rate (that is unsustainable, especially given their form of government) before they can "catch up", per se.

Sorry, I don't know why everyone is running around screaming about China. If there's one int'l actor that the US should be concerned about, it's the Union.
Again, stay in school. You are gravely mistaken.
 

ALEXIS_DH

Tirelessly Awesome
Jan 30, 2003
6,260
881
Lima, Peru, Peru
blue said:
I apologize for the drunken post, but China is still very rural and un-industrialized. It will take between 25-50 years (REALLY FAST) at the current growth rate (that is unsustainable, especially given their form of government) before they can "catch up", per se.

Sorry, I don't know why everyone is running around screaming about China. If there's one int'l actor that the US should be concerned about, it's the Union.
china´s per capita and human development index might not be high... but they are 1.3 billion people.. so it adds up to enough to be the 2nd economy of the world.

at their current economic growth.. their gdp would double every 9-10 years, in about 12-13 years at the current growth rate its economic output will surpase the US.
 

Reactor

Turbo Monkey
Apr 5, 2005
3,976
1
Chandler, AZ, USA
valve bouncer said:
Well duh, as if that isn't obvious to even the most casual of obsevers.;).
<---- still stunned that Reactor hasn't put his 2 bobs worth in on this thread.:love:

I've been busy, I'm only looking at the monkey about once or twice a week. I'm starting to settle in at the new job and things are starting to ease up a little.

I'm very excited about the prospect of having ANY country build a sustainable power producing fusion reactor. If any country does it, others will be forced to follow. If multiple countries start producing a sizable amount of power from fusion...well it will have all sorts of political ripples, some good some bad. We can start getting the world off it's hydrocarbon diet, reduce the leverage of oil producing countries, reduce the cost of oil. It could also cause political instability in the countries currently exporting oil.

I haven't read anything on the ITER or Chinese projects. My engineering days are a long time ago, about the time Reagan, and my expertise is in fissionables. So I can't really comment on the technical aspects of the project. IF only the US had put $400 billion into energy research instead of "Political research" in Iraq.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
Changleen said:
[Editted for clarity]
In 1998, The JT-60 tokamak in Japan produced a high performance reversed shear plasma with the equivalent fusion amplification factor Qeq of 1.25 - the current world record of Q. So we have already broken this barrier.
I, too, stand corrected.
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,919
2,886
Pōneke
UPDATE:

China are starting test burns (dscharges) on their reactor (the EAST reactor) in July. They report they have finished all the necassary 'engineering adjustments'.

They have also fully signed up to the ITER project too and will be paying 10% of the bill.