I don't, there could be anything I can't see on the non drive side shot we have. Little spring roller near the back. I hadn't looked real hard, I just got up, and was more focussed on trying to see the bolts at the back, I shoulda just turned up my screens brightness(on low for frail morning eyes), easier just to look dumb and ask.
you might be able to run through a number of gears with the grip shift, but you can't shift and brake at the same time. I'd only realized how good of an advantage this is when I started using my alfine hub with a trigger shifter.
There is no Horst (LEITNER) link in the rear suspension of the "NICOLAI Ion G-Boxx2", in contrast to the conventional "NICOLAI Ion ST". You´ll see this detail better in the previous posted pics: http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2949826&postcount=211. The rear linkage (red anodized) is localized between the dropout and the seat stay (resp. push rod). The three shiny silver looking bolts near the rear dropout act as fixing bolts for the length adjustable dropout only.
it'd be cool if they came up with something new like at least the g-boxx 2 is trying to do 
<RANT>europeans tend to delineate thousands, millions, etc. with the period, and use the comma as the decimal point. strange but true.
Some similarties, some differences, some really new technology ...
lthumbsdown: Oh yea, and there not claiming its new or will revolutionize biking, so its not I guess
when did I say that schlumpf was made by sram?Bikemonkey - They are actually quite different. You see, first of all they dont even have the same name! There not made by SRAM, so when you strip out a crank (which for SRAM, is inevitable that you will go through a set a year of stipped cranks) you can't just get a free replacement. Umm, it doesnt have a cool name? and oh yea, they don't have nearly as big of a marketing campain going, or one at all for that matter, so that means there not as good.
Oh on another note - Schlumpf could add more gears bikemonkey, in fact a regular internally geared hub could even be used there with some ingenuity (easiest way would be changing the spindle from a solid member to a gear diven member split up on either side of the hub...). Schlumph prolly just took an internally geared hub, changed the internal ratios, so that they could use the sun gear as the driven unit instead of the planetary gears, but still keeping the ring gear as the output. If you get whats going on there, you'll see how a regular hub could be used.
No secret: The REUBER "Boxxhorn" frames (http://www.reuber-die-marke.de/boxxhorn.html) are welded by ...quite a bit like HaveFaith's rig. Not bad at all. Someone's got to do this with a split-pivot rear dropout.
: http://www.mtb-news.de/forum/showpost.php?p=4951491&postcount=12.
Mass centralization still makes a big difference. Considering your legs the shock absorber in the equation, it's quicker and less effort to be abe to pivot the rear around a centralized mass than lift the rear vertically with all the weight back there.
Broad gear range with one shifter.
Very fine search, tfj77! Thank you.
Unfortunately, I can´t see any chain tensioning mechanism for the primary drive. BTW: It is Louis Cypher´s design
(http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3027766&postcount=257). Don´t hesitate to ask him at: http://www.mtb-news.de/forum/showthread.php?t=315022&highlight=v-boxx.
None of these links work for me. I get either "file not found" or "an error has occurred" message.
You are right, EVRAC.
"Straitline"
I forgot that the "Techno" by VARIO Bikes (F) with the SR SUNTOUR V-Boxx was shown at Interbike 2008, too: http://www.sicklines.com/gallery/showgallery.php/cat/827.
