Of course. But a government employee who is issued a piece of gear still assumes proprietary rights to same and if seized it must be tracked properly in order for any information gleaned from it to be considered admissible. If Spicer "conducts" an investigation and uncovers any evidence of a leak, in order for the employee, be he/she a hired hand or appointee, to be prosecuted legally, than all information must have been gained legally.
But I dont think they give a fvck about doing anything legally.
But I dont think they give a fvck about doing anything legally.