He likes Saudis with oilbluebug32 said:I definitely didn't need this point to tell me that he hates blacks or minorities all together
I would surmise that it is anyone he doesn't feel equal to him. I would think that is most everyone.bluebug32 said:I definitely didn't need this point to tell me that he hates blacks or minorities all together
Oh man, that's a funny sentence. There's so many layers to it... genius. Pure genius.BIGHIT756 said:God dammit, every damn time something happens with black people, the blacks pull out the racist card
Funny how it's turned from 'not caring' into 'hating' - Are you channeling yourself?BIGHIT756 said:I'm gonna play the "i dont give a sh!t card" this time, and continue liking bush, who MUST hate black people.
BIGHIT756 said:hmm, that was a dumb video. its not bush's fault that some comments made by the ****ing press were worded different. Ooooooooooh no their black, we MUST be treating it differently. God dammit, every damn time something happens with black people, the blacks pull out the racist card. I'm gonna play the "i dont give a sh!t card" this time, and continue liking bush, who MUST hate black people.
You mean Fox? Black people are used as props on Fox.sugarbushrider1 said:YES! Finally someone sees it my way over here.
On the same page, but off topic slightly, is the whole BET channel sherade. What would happen if the white population made a White-only channel? RACISM!!
Yes, you're terribly oppressed. What a hard life you lead. You are so limited because society is holding you back for your whiteness.sugarbushrider1 said:YES! Finally someone sees it my way over here.
On the same page, but off topic slightly, is the whole BET channel sherade. What would happen if the white population made a White-only channel? RACISM!!
What world do you live in? Anyone is capable of racism. It's just not that threatening from a group that doesn't have any power. Put them in a position of power and it becomes threatening, e.g. if you're all alone in Harlem, anti-white racism becomes very threatening. Imagine that situation, and then understand that it's the way many minorities are made to feel THE MAJORITY OF THE TIME. The good news for you, however, is that outside of Harlem, YOU get to be in a position of power and discrimination from, say, Mexican migrant workers doesn't threaten your health or ability to put food on the table.ridetoofast said:of course only whites are capable of racism, blacks don't have the 'power' necessary to be racist
listen to any of the dribble that the 'civil' rights leaders of today like sharpton, jackson, farrakhan (sp?) spout out.ohio said:What world do you live in? Anyone is capable of racism. It's just not that threatening from a group that doesn't have any power. Put them in a position of power and it becomes threatening, e.g. if you're all alone in Harlem, anti-white racism becomes very threatening. Imagine that situation, and then understand that it's the way many minorities are made to feel THE MAJORITY OF THE TIME. The good news for you, however, is that outside of Harlem, YOU get to be in a position of power and discrimination from, say, Mexican migrant workers doesn't threaten your health or ability to put food on the table.
Read further into my post. I specifically addressed at which point it would be acceptable for a station to be overtly targetting whites.ridetoofast said:i think you are missing his point.
no one denies that programming is targeted at demographics.
he was addressing if a network was proposed to be OVERTLY white, specifically the title...
Tee hee.Changleen said:You mean Fox? Black people are used as props on Fox.
Read my post again. I explain the difference between being capable of racism, and racism being threatening. Racism without power is not threatening. I haven't paid attention to any of the above 3 in a long time, but if depending on their use of the word "racist" in context (using it interchangeably with "discrimination," rather than as "a belief of superiority based on skin color"), they may be saying the same thing.ridetoofast said:listen to any of the dribble that the 'civil' rights leaders of today like sharpton, jackson, farrakhan (sp?) spout out.
according to them blacks are incapable of racism because they lack economic power or some such idiocy like that
ohio said:Yes, you're terribly oppressed. What a hard life you lead. You are so limited because society is holding you back for your whiteness.
I see you're from CT/VT, and you ride Sugarbush. Let me guess: your Dad works in finance in CT and owns a vacation home in Vermont (maybe you go to school in Vermont, but my money is on the former). Being the victim of "reverse" racism that you are, I bet it was really hard to get a good primary education, get into a good college (if you're there yet), and land a job that allows to to afford expensive bicycles that you ride around even more expensive resorts (this is assuming you pay with your own money and not Daddy's). Yup, it's certainly tough being a white male. Let me know where I was wrong.
Outlets like BET result from a complete lack of programming on mainstream TV that caters to a certain cultural audience. In the past it wasn't worth enough money for networks to go after black viewers. You want "white" programming? Turn on ANY of the networks, and they are catering to the majority (by gross income), who happen to be... drum roll... white. Now that the cultural balance is shifting, we will see more network programming catering to black/latino/asian tastes. If, eventually, caucasians cease to be the largest cultural group (by gross income) and as a result networks stop catering to them, then maybe there will be a good reason for there to be a white specific cable channel.
A little copy and paste from a poster who I think is pretty smart:F.O.G said:Bush must hate black people....That must be why he placed Condi Rice as Cheif of Staff to replace the other black gentleman Colin Powell. I didn't see a lot of color or diversity in the Clinton admin at that level.
So are you saying that your dad, as an electrician who isn't wealthy, is not as hardworking as people that are wealthier than him?sugarbushrider1 said:Why is it the wealthy of this country who work their asses off need to pay increased taxes to pay for those who aren't as hardworking?
I am actually curious how many times you HAVE heard that one, and from whom. There is a tremendous amount of criticism of the morality and the lifestyle that popular rap promotes, both from within and without the black community. If you don't hear that criticism, it's more a reflection of what you choose to take note of, than of reality.sugarbushrider1 said:Why is it that I can look at a group of black males with pants at their knees speaking words that I can't understand, nor was meant to, without holding that against them? "thats their culture." Can't tell you how many times i heard that one.
Strike that, reverse it, carry on.sugarbushrider1 said:but apparently I wasn't simple enough for you.
You are not being "slammed". You are being smacked down for acting like an ignorant little brat. Plain and simple. Nothing more, nothing less. Get used to it though, because if you are going to try and match wits with people who are obviously miles ahead of you you are going to be smacked down quite a bit.sugarbushrider1 said:When I make a response and just get slammed for it, I have a reason to be pissed off.