Less vents and the "S" only claims to meet ski/snowboard helmet standards. They are very similar to bike standards, but not quite the same. Mostly they have additional requirements to prevent your helmet being split by the metal edge of skis/boards. There could be some internal changes made to meet the differing standards.
Less vents and the "S" only claims to meet ski/snowboard helmet standards. They are very similar to bike standards, but not quite the same. Mostly they have additional requirements to prevent your helmet being split by the metal edge of skis/boards. There could be some internal changes made to meet the differing standards.
You don't have to pay for certifications to begin with. Every helmet company is allowed to self-certify. Filling in holes changes the impact distribution of the shell, so they very likely could have messed with the internals in order to compensate for the stiffer shell.
Again, the standards are very similar, so I wouldn't be too afraid of using it for dual purposes in a pinch.
Did some more searching last night. The Remedy S uses ASTM F2040 and I assume that the Remedy uses ASTM F2043 (although I can't find official confirmation of this).
After comparing my Remedy to a Remedy S I'm pretty sure it won't cause spontaneous combustion if worn on a bike. After all the ASTM spec is for alpine sports.
This specification defines performance requirements for helmets used in nonmotorized recreational snow sports (such as skiing, snowboarding, and other alpine sports).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.