Isn't that a pokeymon?I installed and used it all day today and am quite impressed. I'm on a quad-core xeon Mac Pro with 8 JiggleBytes of ram too. I'm still getting used to the tabs on the very top and the search in the address bar.
Careful. This gets to be a habit, and then an addiction. Suddenly you can't go back to any other browser since you can't figure out why it's not searching for things when you type things in the address bar.I installed and used it all day today and am quite impressed. I'm on a quad-core xeon Mac Pro with 8 JiggleBytes of ram too. I'm still getting used to the tabs on the very top and the search in the address bar.
I'm never turning back. What I can't figure out is why no one did this sooner, I've been wanting to see this feature for years.Careful. This gets to be a habit, and then an addiction. Suddenly you can't go back to any other browser since you can't figure out why it's not searching for things when you type things in the address bar.
I agree with this; I switched back to Firefox for a little while because I wanted to try out a particular extension and I spent the whole time typing searches into the address barCareful. This gets to be a habit, and then an addiction. Suddenly you can't go back to any other browser since you can't figure out why it's not searching for things when you type things in the address bar.
No, but I think its a good idea!is there any way to toggle what the address bar searches for? ie, set to look for images?
Yes. Here's the mac way:is there any way to toggle what the address bar searches for? ie, set to look for images?
Oh snap I never thought of that. cool.Yes. Here's the mac way:
Chrome > Preferences > Default Search, click Manage > Click the + to add images.google.com > select it and click Make Default
Although, it would be nice if there was a drop down somewhere in the main screen. You'll have to switch this every time if you want to do a regular search.
Is it really worth it to change search preferences though? If I'm looking for an image of something, you type in whatever you're searching for into the search field, then click "image" once the results pull up. 2 clicks. If it's something I'm shopping for, "shopping" will usually be one of the top 2 results, and the same with informational things (usually wikipedia.org). <shrug>yeah a dropdown like Firefox has is much better than having to go into preferences to set the search type.
hey when you're looking for pr0n you want as few clicks as possible.Is it really worth it to change search preferences though? If I'm looking for an image of something, you type in whatever you're searching for into the search field, then click "image" once the results pull up. 2 clicks. If it's something I'm shopping for, "shopping" will usually be one of the top 2 results, and the same with informational things (usually wikipedia.org). <shrug>
If you change to OpenDNS's public DNS all browsers will work that way plus it has malicious website filtering and other features. Most test show it to be the fastest free public DNS service even beating Google's new public DNS service.I agree with this; I switched back to Firefox for a little while because I wanted to try out a particular extension and I spent the whole time typing searches into the address bar
PC Mag said:Overall, I don't see speed as a reason to switch to Google DNS, as local ISP DNS servers will usually be adequate, and OpenDNS is marginally faster than either. Still, if you're given to tweaking your computer and suspect that you're not getting all the speed you could (and who doesn't, sometimes) you might want to point to a different DNS server. Personally, I'd recommend OpenDNS, based on my tests. If you do change DNS servers, let us know about your experiences in the comments section of this story.
random user test said:DNS Nameservers:
4.2.2.2 - Level3 DNS
8.8.8.8 - Google DNS
208.67.222.222 - OpenDNS
195.92.195.90 - Orange DNS (ISP)
156.154.70.1 - DNS Advantage
Site #1 (bbc.co.uk):
L3: 50 msec
Google: 44 msec
OpenDNS: 37 msec
Orange: 34 msec
DNS Adv: 37 msec
Site #2 (reddit.com)
L3: 51 msec
Google: 46 msec
OpenDNS: 36 msec
Orange: 35 msec
DNS Adv: 35 msec
Site #3 (google.com):
L3: 51 msec
Google: 44 msec
OpenDNS: 35 msec
Orange: 36 msec
DNS Adv: 37 msec
Site #4 (stratics.com):
L3: 51 msec
Google: 43 msec
OpenDNS: 35 msec
Orange: 35 msec
DNS Adv: 38 msec
Site #5 (cnn.com):
L3: 51 msec
Google: 158 msec
OpenDNS: 35 msec
Orange: 35 msec
DNS Adv: 37 msec
Site #6 (opendns.com):
L3: 51 msec
Google: 227 msec
OpenDNS: 35 msec
Orange: 36 msec
DNS Adv: 37 msec
As demonstrated, OpenDNS servers seem to respond faster than Google's for me. Google's servers responded incredibly slowly in the last two cases, which is concerning. My ISP's nameserver is generally quite fast also.
Seems to me OpenDNS has the advantage both in speed and extra functionality.
firefox also has the little icon in the google taskbar, so you can type what you are looking for, then click on the icon which for the search type you want.Is it really worth it to change search preferences though? If I'm looking for an image of something, you type in whatever you're searching for into the search field, then click "image" once the results pull up. 2 clicks. If it's something I'm shopping for, "shopping" will usually be one of the top 2 results, and the same with informational things (usually wikipedia.org). <shrug>
I went back to Safari.after a brief dalliance w/ Chrome, i think i'm back to FF.
^^^ that is what really hurts me. but i cant go back to FF chrome is just so smooth for meFirefox still has a functional Autofill, way more extensions (no EXIF viewer for Chrome, among others), and is color-managed.
.
what didnt you like about itJust went back to FF. Chrome is great but needs a few changes, then I will go back.
I notice only a marginal difference in speed (windows). The one thing Chrome does that FF doesn't is having separate threading for each tab. So if something crashes in one tab, only that one is affected, the rest of your tabs/windows won't crash & close.Yep, I went back to FF also.
Snow Leopard 10.6.2 on a MBP.
The tab browsing bothered me and it didn't seem any faster than FF.
yeah, having no exif viewer is a pain, as is finding the other properties of a image.^^^ that is what really hurts me. but i cant go back to FF chrome is just so smooth for me