Haha! You idiot!sanjuro said:...running a stop sign. I didn't know there was a cop behind me.
I am still a little mad, but it was a very debatable ticket. I really want to beat it either way.
If you're on the street, riding or driving any vehicle, motorized or not, you are subject to the same laws. There are, I think, three or four exceptions in AZ. My wife thought I was crazy for yelling at her for running stop signs....until one day she stopped, crossed the intersection, and a cop pulled up beside her "Good job, it's nice NOT to have write a cyclist a ticket for running a stop sign, for once".sirknight6 said:I would contest it. You were on a bicycle, and not in a motor vehicle. The reason I mention this is that if they took your drivers license and wrote you a ticket, it could affect your car insurance. Or not.
I'd be curious to find out. Time to do some research...
firetoole said:so you only follow the rules when there are cops around?
I don't know if it would affect your car insurance or not, but I guess it could. In VA, bikes traveling on the road are classified as "vehicles" and as such are required to follow all the same laws as motor vehicles. There are a few exceptions, mostly related to speed of travel. I got a written warning and a nice long lecture from a motorcycle cop on how he could write me up for reckless driving for splitting the lanes.sirknight6 said:I'd be curious to find out. Time to do some research...
Why fight it if you did it? You broke the law, you got caught, suck it up.Reactor said:Given that, I would fight the ticket. There is always the chance the officer might not show up for court, and most courts will let you walk.
AmenPonySoldier said:That my friend is the American way....
Andy_B said:Same Rights same Rules.
Suck it up.
No ****.BikeGeek said:Why fight it if you did it? You broke the law, you got caught, suck it up.
I always said I wish there were fewer bike rights but less enforcement as well.Andy_B said:Same Rights same Rules.
Suck it up.
I don't question the ticket, nor do I question the responsibility of riding a bike on the road. What I do question that if in fact that it should not affect car insurance, however, if one can get a ticket for the operation of a bicycle on the road, it affects the whatever point system of the particular jurisdiction one resides. That being the case, we can further conclude that if one accumulates points on their driving record, will, in fact, affect ones car insurance.BikeGeek said:I don't know if it would affect your car insurance or not, but I guess it could. In VA, bikes traveling on the road are classified as "vehicles" and as such are required to follow all the same laws as motor vehicles. There are a few exceptions, mostly related to speed of travel. I got a written warning and a nice long lecture from a motorcycle cop on how he could write me up for reckless driving for splitting the lanes.
I received a "Bicycle failure to stop", not an "auto" failure.sirknight6 said:I would contest it. You were on a bicycle, and not in a motor vehicle. The reason I mention this is that if they took your drivers license and wrote you a ticket, it could affect your car insurance. Or not.
I'd be curious to find out. Time to do some research...
You know the laws, you chose to break the law and you got busted.sanjuro said:I always said I wish there were fewer bike rights but less enforcement as well.
I guess that is the product of learning how to ride in NYC.
I tend to agree, as long as you didn't blow through going flat chat leaving grannies sprawled in your wake there should be some wiggle room there. There's the letter of the law and then there's the spirit of the law, guess your cop chose the former.sanjuro said:Really, I just think traffic law enforcement against bikes is unnecessary. I was riding suburban (that's why I got a ticket) back streets at 7:30pm at night on my way home to SF. And of course, if I get into an accident, who's the one who is going to get hurt?
So what if the driver swerves trying to miss you and plows into another car or worst onto a side walk and takes out some innocent pedestrians?sanjuro said:And of course, if I get into an accident, who's the one who is going to get hurt?
The only reason to fight it is because it might effect your auto insurance rates, and there is a good chance you'll get off.BikeGeek said:Why fight it if you did it? You broke the law, you got caught, suck it up.
Awesome assumptions!sirknight6 said:What I do question that if in fact that it should not affect car insurance, however, if one can get a ticket for the operation of a bicycle on the road, it affects the whatever point system of the particular jurisdiction one resides. That being the case, we can further conclude that if one accumulates points on their driving record, will, in fact, affect ones car insurance.
This seems relevant:sirknight6 said:I don't question the ticket, nor do I question the responsibility of riding a bike on the road. What I do question that if in fact that it should not affect car insurance, however, if one can get a ticket for the operation of a bicycle on the road, it affects the whatever point system of the particular jurisdiction one resides. That being the case, we can further conclude that if one accumulates points on their driving record, will, in fact, affect ones car insurance.
If we can reasonably draw that conclusion, then if anything happens to my bike, ie., Like I get hit, bike is stolen, Or I run into someone or something, in effect, my auto insurance should in fact cover damages.
yes I know it is AUTO insurance, however, I got a ticket on my MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE. You can't have one without the other.
I rather like BigMikes idea, ride somewhere the cop couldnt go!
(b) The following violations are not required to be reported under subdivision (a):
(6) Violations for which a person was cited as a pedestrian or while operating a bicycle or a motorized scooter.
This is something that I feel should be taken up with your insurance company, not through the legal system.Reactor said:The only reason to fight it is because it might effect your auto insurance rates, and there is a good chance you'll get off.
Good one! Should I shoot any driver that cuts me off, drives in the bike lane, or just a jerk-off because I am saving lives by killing lawbreakers?Wumpus said:So what if the driver swerves trying to miss you and plows into another car or worst onto a side walk and takes out some innocent pedestrians?
Maybe the fact that you disregard traffic laws on your bike is why a lot of people don't respect cyclist rights.
It's funny that you think that because you ride a bike you shouldn't have to obey the law.
Do you think this argument is a winner if you were driving a car?sanjuro said:I was riding a quiet street with one car going in the opposite direction. There were no pedestrians, and I was going a small down hill but I was braking the entire way, doing about 10mph. The other car was moving straight, which is when I released my brakes. I could have stopped at any time in 5 feet if he was making a left turn.
No course not. But a car and bike are not exactly the same now.OGRipper said:Do you think this argument is a winner if you were driving a car?
It is hypocritical to expect cars to follow the rules but think you get some special exemption. You want the protection of law - you want to be treated like a vehicle when it comes to having your right to a lane, etc. - but you don't think you should have to stop for a stop sign? That is weak, and people taking your position are part of the reason we don't get respect on the road. I'm not saying I don't coast through a stop sign now and then - but I don't try to justify it.sanjuro said:No course not. But a car and bike are not exactly the same now.
I know this is a loser of an argument, so I will drop out of it now. What I don't like is after the ticket, I slowed down at every stop sign to under 5mph. The indecision about running stops really puts me at risk.
Your justification for running stop signs is "I don't justify my behavior".OGRipper said:It is hypocritical to expect cars to follow the rules but think you get some special exemption. You want the protection of law - you want to be treated like a vehicle when it comes to having your right to a lane, etc. - but you don't think you should have to stop for a stop sign? That is weak, and people taking your position are part of the reason we don't get respect on the road. I'm not saying I don't coast through a stop sign now and then - but I don't try to justify it.
And you are creating the risk through your own indecision.
You're missing the point. My saying that I run a stop sign now and then is not in any way a justification or advocacy. It is an admission of wrong, in the same way I admitted I was wrong when I got a ticket on Tam a little while back. I also admit that I sometimes exceed the speed limit in my car. That doesn't mean I think it's ok, and if I get caught I am not going to argue that the speed limit doesn't apply to ME. Yes, when it comes to this stuff I am a hypocrit. But at least I admit it.sanjuro said:Your justification for running stop signs is "I don't justify my behavior".
Why don't you pay my ticket to alleviate your hypocrisy? Then the next time you advocate one thing and do another, you're covered.
You do exactly the same behavior I do on a bike, but I don't criticize other riders.