I'm trying to figure out a way to un-over-engineer the current industry standard. if you can't backpedal in your three lowest gears, then moving the cassette to the driveside makes some sense. I would argue that most people spend significantly more time in their lowest gears as compared to their highest (largest cogs compared to the smallest).Are you talking about trying to set up a Megatrail with a 50mm chainline, or are you asking a hypothetical frame design question?
This is how you know all of the trails in the US are buried in snow or muddy right now.
STUPENDOUS STANDARDSI'm trying to figure out a way to un-over-engineer the current industry standard. if you can't backpedal in your three lowest gears, then moving the cassette to the driveside makes some sense. I would argue that most people spend significantly more time in their lowest gears as compared to their highest (largest cogs compared to the smallest).
Just trying to figure out what the point of the offset boost stuff was. Sounds like it's all tire clearance. If one could run the chain in the normal, 50mm spot, then you'd get the cassette where it needs to be for the above solution.
Primary: Tire clearance with short chainstaysI'm trying to figure out a way to un-over-engineer the current industry standard. if you can't backpedal in your three lowest gears, then moving the cassette to the driveside makes some sense. I would argue that most people spend significantly more time in their lowest gears as compared to their highest (largest cogs compared to the smallest).
Just trying to figure out what the point of the offset boost stuff was. Sounds like it's all tire clearance. If one could run the chain in the normal, 50mm spot, then you'd get the cassette where it needs to be for the above solution.
I'm trying to figure out a way to un-over-engineer the current industry standard. if you can't backpedal in your three lowest gears, then moving the cassette to the driveside makes some sense. I would argue that most people spend significantly more time in their lowest gears as compared to their highest (largest cogs compared to the smallest).
Just trying to figure out what the point of the offset boost stuff was. Sounds like it's all tire clearance. If one could run the chain in the normal, 50mm spot, then you'd get the cassette where it needs to be for the above solution.
Silly Sally, therez never enough shimzz.sufficient shimz
Is that a small? Is there clearance for a shock with a reservoir and water bottle?With all this SS talk....the bike itself is pretty radView attachment 124396
Fixed!With all this SS talk....the bike itself is Super SweetView attachment 124396
That's a medium; there's room for a reservoir shock and a water bottle.Is that a small? Is there clearance for a shock with a reservoir and water bottle?
It also seemed odd to us. They set the bike up in the stiffest possible configuration that we recommend, which is listed in the owner's manual as for those that prefer a firm top stroke (120mm rear travel, Crush Mode, 25% sag, 2 air volume spacers) and then said it wasn't soft enough. We talked to them today and expressed that, and their reply was that they didn't have enough time to try to find an ideal setup.Bike Mag's bible review of the Trail Pistol was a little confusing, but certainly less than sterling...did you have an opportunity to chat with them about their criticisms? For example, they point out that the bike has long, slack and low geo, but then proceeded to say that the ride quality was that of the old crop of 29ers...which by all accounts were short, steep and tall. I've lost a lot of faith in the quality of their reviews , but was still pretty surprised to hear the negativity, what gives?
Because...amateurs.Also sounded to me like the two short guys neeeded to size down or stfu. Why do they have such a spread of heights testing the same exact same sized bike?
And why would they test so many bikes that they can't play with suspension setup?
Boooo @BikeMag
Wait, you guys don't supply an F1-style pit crew to dial in bike setup on the trail anymore? That's obviously the problem.It also seemed odd to us. They set the bike up in the stiffest possible configuration that we recommend, which is listed in the owner's manual as for those that prefer a firm top stroke (120mm rear travel, Crush Mode, 25% sag, 2 air volume spacers) and then said it wasn't soft enough. We talked to them today and expressed that, and their reply was that they didn't have enough time to try to find an ideal setup.
Running more sag, 130mm rear travel, removing air volume spacers, and switching to Plush Mode would all have made for the softer ride they wanted.
Yep, we have a couple reviews planned for the new Megatrail/SS. It'll probably be Spring time when they begin to drop.Their reviews have become all too predictable...Yeti, Evil and Trek can do no wrong it seems, but they like to sprinkle in a weirdly negative review every now and then. Oh Vernon, how Bike misses you.
I'm becoming increasingly stoked on the MT SS...like, want is becoming need. Do you guys have plans to send MTs out to review with anyone?
Don't forget to include the "5 Star Bike Review Envelope", seems you forgot it for the BIKE reviewYep, we have a couple reviews planned for the new Megatrail/SS. It'll probably be Spring time when they begin to drop.