don't blame me, blame the autocorrect on my phone.you misspelled judgment
don't blame me, blame the autocorrect on my phone.you misspelled judgment
That looks like the white trash version of Jolin and Alvin.Is that the Trailer Mafia?i'll just leave this right here:
Natural selection...This is the first time this has ever happened.
Ever.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/19/us/north-carolina-gun-show-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
I said almost the same thing to some friends at a coffee house this evening when they just read it on their smarty pants phone.This all could have been stopped by one Good Guy with a Gun®. Clearly the solution is to post an armed guard at every gun show.
that would only stop a bad guy with a gun. there is little defense against an idiot with a gun.This all could have been stopped by one Good Guy with a Gun®.
The numbers also show universally that great availability of guns lead to increased suicide as the act is typically a transitory impulse and short-lived. I thought the GOP was pro-life and Christian?My issue is why there is no listing for the actual number of deaths by the assault rifle, only "mass killings - 18" like "regular killings" don't apply to assault rifles.
EK: As I understand it, there’s a stronger link between guns and suicide than between guns and homicide. And one of the really interesting parts of your paper is your recounting of the Israeli military’s effort to cut suicides among soldiers by restricting access to guns.
JR: Yes, it’s very striking. In Israel, it used to be that all soldiers would take the guns home with them. Now they have to leave them on base. Over the years they’ve done this — it began, I think, in 2006 — there’s been a 60 percent decrease in suicide on weekends among IDS soldiers. And it did not correspond to an increase in weekday suicide. People think suicide is an impulse that exists and builds. This shows that doesn’t happen. The impulse to suicide is transitory. Someone with access to a gun at that moment may commit suicide, but if not, they may not.
how about claiming to be an educational poster that labels a shotgun as a "rifle?" that's the kind of **** that sends the gun nuts I know into a tailspin when it comes from the lamestream media.
my only issue: the mixing of accidental/negligent deaths w/ intentional
I didnt know you can drive corvettes without a license in the US??Maybe we should ban Corvette's too, no one needs that much power.
or a car that ugly.Maybe we should ban Corvette's too, no one needs that much power.
just like killing people.....nothing is stopping you...I didnt know you can drive corvettes without a license in the US??
you can have a gun without a licenseI didnt know you can drive corvettes without a license in the US??
clearly that's the problem. you should have to go to the DMV to get a gun.you can have a gun without a license
Thats what I said.you can have a gun without a license
and even with a license, more people die via a vehicleThats what I said.
Slope is comparing Assault rifles with high powered cars, but at least for a car you need a license...
cars aren't a constitutional right.The car analogy is pretty stupid. There are a ton of regulations a car needs to meet in order to be street legal.
It's not just that driving requires licenses, they require training, testing, insurance, registration, there are people out on patrols to make sure that people driving cars are doing the right thing, standards that car manufacturers have to meet for safety and features, there are services out there to protect you and render emergency service, and so on. We realize the destructive power of cars, so we have many regulations and controls in place to help mitigate it. Only a complete...well, I 'll just stop myself right here...Maybe we should ban Corvette's too, no one needs that much power.
No, we should just come up with technology/software that disables texting while the cellphone is moving more than 20mph. Simple fix.how many people have died because a driver was texting? we should ban cell phones
i think there's a better argument to make health insurance a constitutional right before cars... besides, we already bailed detroit out once.It's not just that driving requires licenses, they require training, testing, insurance, registration, there are people out on patrols to make sure that people driving cars are doing the right thing, standards that car manufacturers have to meet for safety and features, there are services out there to protect you and render emergency service, and so on. We realize the destructive power of cars, so we have many regulations and controls in place to help mitigate it. Only a complete...well, I 'll just stop myself right here...
And yes, driving should probably be a constitutional right if you meet the required criteria. It's pretty much necessary for anyone to have a living, with some rare exceptions (because even when you take the bus like me, you still have to be able to drive at times, at work, etc).
Last time I checked Drunk and reckless driving weren't legal so I think you are harsh. Sending every gun owner to jail like he was a drunk driver because only some of them kill people. Damn liberals. Obama doesn't drive his kids to school himself. Are his children better than ours?
my only issue: the mixing of accidental/negligent deaths w/ intentional