and many lolz were had......
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/8095327/Gun-group-takes-down-Facebook-page
Pffftt... The NRA already is an extremist organization, no need to worry about being confused for one.The last thing the NRA wants is to be characterised as sharing an extremist or offensive position posted by someone who doesn't speak for it or the rest of its fans
When guys who are too scared to ride bikes well started buying guns to compensate and started posting here?When did Ridemonkey become the pussy club?
The 2nd Amendment doesn’t mandate it should be easy to acquire a firearm. ... snip ... You’re “right” to own those doesn’t not trump my children’s right to live, or anyone’s right to live.
I'd say most of the assholes pulling off these type of acts are far too much of pussies to ever do anything that would require any sort of physical 'combat', even if it's just little kids they're attacking. They're self-pitying pussies to the core, and if it wasn't made so easy for them, they'd stay home and stick to video games and cutting themselves.Maybe, maybe with a shotgun he could have cleared more than 1 room. I don't see a need for public access to assault type rifles or any large capacity rifle for that matter. Shotgun for home defense, hunting rifle for hunting, hand gun for fun if needed.
And at least if you go after someone with a knife, it's more personal than just aim/fire. A ban on kitchen knifes would go too far IMO.
is that an inverted 1050 of an english sentence?When guys who are too scared to ride bikes well started buying guns to compensate started posting here?
either way...the drug industry wants to thank you....There have been a number of posts lately discussing the issue of mental health in this country, which is a good thing. But what about the mental well being of those who rush to the gun store to purchase the exact model rifle that was used two days prior to murder 20 children ?
one well placed 'and' makes all the differenceis that an inverted 1050 of an english sentence?
Apparently they have not considered the affects of having children grow up in an environment that is ruled by fear. Unfvcking real...As some lawmakers call for real gun control reform in the wake of the Newtown tragedy, others are proposing a different strategy to curb school violence: arm the teachers. Republicans in at least six states plan to introduce legislation that would allow or require school staff to carry guns an idea the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence called "insane."
Meanwhile, a Texas gun store owner is cutting teachers a deal: a 10 percent discount on his concealed carry handgun classes.
Here are 11 people who think that more guns in Sandy Hook Elementary could have saved lives last week:
They want the US to be like Israel. All guns and checkpoints and suspicion.Well, just when you thought the GOP couldn't get any more nutty:
[/URL]
Israel has more gun control than the US:They want the US to be like Israel. All guns and checkpoints and suspicion.
Israel rejects 40 percent of its applications for a gun, the highest rate of rejection of any country in the world...all guns must have an Interior Ministry permit and identifying mark for tracing.
Thanks for asking, gun control is working:Anarchy...law abiding citizens carrying guns around.
Check the statistics of crime in concealed carry states versus those that don't.
While the causes of individual acts of mass violence always differ, our analysis shows fatal gun violence is less likely to occur in richer states with more post-industrial knowledge economies, higher levels of college graduates, and tighter gun laws. Factors like drug use, stress levels, and mental illness are much less significant than might be assumed.
Gun control great works for the entire civilized industrialized world. Every single OECD country in the world other than the US, Mexico, and Estonia have magnitudes less violent crime.Gun control only works for dictators.
...and NRA platitudes work well for mouth breathers.Anarchy...law abiding citizens carrying guns around.
Check the statistics of crime in concealed carry states versus those that don't.
Gun control only works for dictators.
This. This is also how it works in Yurp. If you feel like you need to protect your family and you have to have a gun for it you will get it. It just won't come with a happy meal. I'm with you on this 100%. I like guns but let's be reasonable about them.The idea that its easier to purchase an AR/AK/SKS at a gun show than it is to purchase a car is ludicrous. The 2nd Amendment doesnt mandate it should be easy to acquire a firearm. As much as Id love a nice full quad railed 14.5 middy Bravo Company AR or a HK MR223 and go out and play DEVGRU in an abandoned field somewhere in north central Arkansas, its not going to happen, and it shouldnt happen and that is NOT an infringement on my 2nd Amendment rights. I have the right to protect myself and my family, which I can do quite effectively with my 226, if I need more oomph Ill spring for a Remington 870. Thats more than enough to protect my family in the event something Katrina like happens here in central Arkansas.
I think it's much more likely that he's just another typical gun-nut blowhard and he'll do exactly what the cops tell him to do. And maybe pee himself a little. Then he'll spend the rest of his days embellishing the story in front of the other constitutional scholars and wanna-be civil warriors down at the local sportsman's club.Let me re-iterate: he'd rather kill multiple police officers whose boss made a mistake and be shot in return, than surrender and work things out within the legal system.
Can the US government extradite the whole civil war gun nut movement to Quebec. The frenchies there also want their own country, no one wants them and they are also special beings. They would get together nicely and maybe they'd nominate Terry Crews to be their president (I like him so I hope he declines) and water the fields with a mix of wine and moonshine.I think it's much more likely that he's just another typical gun-nut blowhard and he'll do exactly what the cops tell him to do. And maybe pee himself a little. Then he'll spend the rest of his days embellishing the story in front of the other constitutional scholars and wanna-be civil warriors down at the local sportsman's club.
Which makes me wonder - how come these guys haven't made good on all their 'civil war' bull****ting over the fact that they can't have full auto weapons? Where in the Constitution is that 'right' denied to them? Shouldn't they be jumping off of their bar stools and engaging the enemy somewhere?
I think it's much more likely that he's just another typical gun-nut blowhard and he'll do exactly what the cops tell him to do. And maybe pee himself a little. Then he'll spend the rest of his days embellishing the story in front of the other constitutional scholars and wanna-be civil warriors down at the local sportsman's club.
Which makes me wonder - how come these guys haven't made good on all their 'civil war' bull****ting over the fact that they can't have full auto weapons? Where in the Constitution is that 'right' denied to them? Shouldn't they be jumping off of their bar stools and engaging the enemy somewhere?
The history of the Pinto isn’t unusual. You can tell a similar story about many other American consumer goods. In general, products in the United States used to be very unsafe. Cars exploded, appliances caught fire, drugs killed children. In the early 1980s, there were about 300 deaths caused by carbon-monoxide poisoning from home devices—things like furnaces and water heaters—every year. Nowadays there are fewer than 200 such deaths, and the number keeps decreasing. What happened? As in the story of the Pinto, lawsuits, media coverage, and regulations forced change. Unsafe products caused tragedies that made headlines, companies were fined and embarrassed, and slowly but surely, our products improved.
There’s a singular exception to this general advancement: guns. Research shows that it’s possible to make safer firearms. There are a slew of sensible technologies that gunmakers could add to their products that might prevent hundreds or thousands of deaths per year. One area of active research is known as the “smart gun”—a trigger-identification system that prevents a gun from being fired by anyone other than its authorized user. (James Bond carries one in Skyfall.)
But we aren’t likely to see smart guns on the market anytime soon. Even though the idea is technologically sound—researchers at the New Jersey Institute of Technology have created a working prototype of a gun that determines whether or not to fire based on a user’s “grip pattern”—gun makers aren’t taking it up. They’ve been slow to add other safety technologies, too, including indicators that show whether a gun is loaded and “magazine safeties” that prevent weapons from being fired when their ammunition magazine is removed. (The magazine’s removal might lead some users to assume the gun isn’t loaded when there may in fact be a round in the chamber.)
Why aren’t gunmakers making safer guns? Because guns are exempt from most of the consumer safety laws that improved the rest of American life. The Consumer Product Safety Commission, which was established in 1972, is charged with looking over thousands of different kinds of products. If you search its database for “guns,” you’ll find lots of recalls of defective air pistols and lead-covered toy guns but nothing about real firearms. That’s because the CPSC is explicitly prohibited from regulating firearms. If you’re injured by a gun, you can’t even go to court. In 2005, Congress passed and President George W. Bush signed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which immunizes gun makers against lawsuits resulting from “misuse” of the products. If they can’t be sued and can’t be regulated, gunmakers have no incentive to make smarter guns. It’s the Pinto story in reverse.
Oh thank you very nice.
I do not possess the rep capacity..........
head of nail, meet hammer
I still ride bikes. Just not in the summer in AZ. I do fear death by dehydration. Though I hear the hallucinations are not to be missed in that process.When guys who are too scared to ride bikes well started buying guns to compensate and started posting here?
Actually in the Constitution they are treated as equals as they're both choices. You chose to reproduce. Others choose to own weapons. In the Constitution, and this has been upheld in the courts, if its an item of choice than all items are equal under the law.Originally Posted by Andyman_1970 View Post
The 2nd Amendment doesnt mandate it should be easy to acquire a firearm. ... snip ... Youre right to own those doesnt not trump my childrens right to live, or anyones right to live..
There is nothing in the Constitution about making it easy to obtain firearms. Being able to go to a gun show and by an AR/AK/SKS with ZERO background check and training is irresponsible and that's putting it lightly. One can go to a gun show and walk out with an AR, multiple 30rd mags and be batsh!t crazy in less than a half an hour. Hell I can't even buy a car from a dealer that quick, even if I threw down cash.In the Constitution, and this has been upheld in the courts, if its an item of choice than all items are equal under the law.
Sounds like your rights are being infringed upon.So much idiocy, so little time...if the frothers really want guns, I have recruiter friends I can hook them all up with. I cna get you all the guns you want. Only we have to follow range safety rules, be trained and show proficiency in order to carry weapons.
Equal under the constitution, equal under the law but not equal under common sense.Actually in the Constitution they are treated as equals as they're both choices. You chose to reproduce. Others choose to own weapons. In the Constitution, and this has been upheld in the courts, if its an item of choice than all items are equal under the law.