relatedGun used in San Francisco came from a "law abiding citizen", once again...
fuck defending yourself....you can reason with crazy.Yes. If only one of those Marines had access and the ability to use a weapon.
Everyone knows, no good guys with guns up there.that is way the fvck up north in maine.
just a bunch of rednecks.Everyone knows, no good guys with guns up there.
Correct.no defense is the best defense.
In a truly free society one shouldn't have to arm yourself to be safe.no defense is the best defense.
no country ever...In a truly free society one shouldn't have to arm yourself to be safe.
FTFU.no country ever that reeks of paranoia and insecurity...
Most first world countries do an order of magnitude better.no country ever...
Can't get any more free than the Old American West. You were free to die much more frequently - historical fact over NRA fantasy.if your country has a army...you are not truly free.
In a truly free society one shouldn't have to arm yourself to be safe.
Nice strawman, we were talking about private individuals in society not National govenments.if your country has a army...you are not truly free.
You never know what stevew is talking about.Nice strawman, we were talking about private individuals in society not National govenments.
i thiught today would be a good day to quit sniffing glue...You never know what stevew is talking about.
Are you going to rewrite macroeconomics and tell us how a nation should be run like a family budget too? That's another good one from the land of glue sniffers and paint huffers.i thiught today would be a good day to quit sniffing glue...
no.Are you going to rewrite macroeconomics and tell us how a nation should be run like a family budget too? That's another good one from the land of glue sniffers and paint huffers.
I couldn't give it up, but I just stick with Elmer's these days.i thiught today would be a good day to quit sniffing glue...
The average military serviceman has almost zero access to weapons except when specifically armed for training or war, or for standing a particular duty which must be armed, like being an MP. Nor are the vast majority trained to use a pistol in any semblance of an effective manner, especially carrying outside of battlefield conditions.Yes. If only one of those Marines had access and the ability to use a weapon.
IDF limited access on purpose to save lives. Less guns means safer - gun suicides are a bigger problem than gun homicides in the US:The average military serviceman has almost zero access to weapons except when specifically armed for training or war, or for standing a particular duty which must be armed, like being an MP. Nor are the vast majority trained to use a pistol in any semblance of an effective manner, especially carrying outside of battlefield conditions.
http://www.vox.com/2015/6/3/8721267/gun-suicide-gun-controlA similar thing happened when the Israeli Defense Forces stopped letting troops bring their guns home over the weekend in 2006. A study by researchers with the IDF's Division of Mental Health and Sheba Medical Center found the policy change reduced suicides among IDF soldiers by 40 percent, mostly due to a drop in suicides using firearms committed over weekends, with no noticeable change in weekday suicides.
This is true, only Officers trained with pistols in the Army.The average military serviceman has almost zero access to weapons except when specifically armed for training or war, or for standing a particular duty which must be armed, like being an MP. Nor are the vast majority trained to use a pistol in any semblance of an effective manner, especially carrying outside of battlefield conditions.
The average military serviceman has almost zero access to weapons except when specifically armed for training or war, or for standing a particular duty which must be armed, like being an MP. Nor are the vast majority trained to use a pistol in any semblance of an effective manner, especially carrying outside of battlefield conditions.
Related?This is true, only Officers trained with pistols in the Army.
As usual, however, Trump has things backward. The issue isn’t gun-free zones; it is free-for-all gun zones, which decades of lax firearms laws have produced all over the country. In an America held hostage by the gun lobby, radicalized lone-wolf terrorists can get their hands on deadly weapons and mountains of ammunition just as easily as disturbed post-adolescents, delusional military subcontractors, virulent racists, and anybody else.
Trump ignores all of this, of course, and he couldn’t even get the details straight about those “gun-free zones.” He ignored the fact that the military police who enforce the laws on military installations are routinely armed, as are other soldiers engaged in security roles, such as guard duty. Moreover, the four marines were killed not at the recruitment center, where the sign prohibiting firearms was located, but at the Naval Reserve center. It was there, too, that Abdulazeez was reportedly shot dead by police, who had pursued him from the recruitment office. Sadly, neither the military guards nor the police managed to stop Abdulazeez before he had killed four people. But to claim that these victims would be alive if they had been armed is pure speculation.
Well not by YOUR standards. But you kill bitches with a staple and cold stare.Nor are the vast majority trained to use a pistol in any semblance of an effective manner,
That story need the monty python theme music playing in the background while you read it.Good guy with a gun disarmed and shot in the ass by a drunk:
http://gawker.com/florida-man-shot-in-ass-protecting-turtle-nests-from-dr-1718921566
Well why the Hell not ? You can take yer gunz to the bar with ya. Booze, firearms, testosterone, stupidity and now drones. It's just progression man, can't fight it. Magnets...Drones! Guns! A winning combo for all!
http://m.mysanantonio.com/news/crime/article/18-year-old-s-video-of-gun-firing-drone-spurs-6397168.php