Gun Control
There is nothing.......and I mean nothing, more awesome than hearing a fat guy who looks 15 years older than he is screaming angrily in a texas accent. The day that loses its magic is the day I check out. Because I am obviously no longer alive.
Brietbart must have been a tragic loss for you.
And for $tinkle, but for a different reason.
And for $tinkle, but for a different reason.
At first, yes.
But then all you have to do is read some of the shlt his idiot organization is doing without him but in his name and it's all better.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2259190/Keith-Ratliff-Popular-online-guns-explosives-expert-shot-death-rural-Georgia-road.html
apparently, being a "good guy w/ a gun" isn't always enough to stop a bad guy w/ a gun
apparently, being a "good guy w/ a gun" isn't always enough to stop a bad guy w/ a gun
Well you see the obvious flaw: only his hands can use current firearms. He should have designed a gun for his head. You know.....that his head can fire. It's the only way.
good guy w/ a gun (home invasion anecdote):
http://www.gazette.com/news/home-149512-arrested-three.html
but wait, he was holding; does that make *him* a bad guy w/ a gun?
http://www.gazette.com/news/home-149512-arrested-three.html
but wait, he was holding; does that make *him* a bad guy w/ a gun?
Nope
That's pretty much straight up lapierre fap material for the next 5 years.
edit: wait, was the homeowner black?
That's pretty much straight up lapierre fap material for the next 5 years.
edit: wait, was the homeowner black?
Last edited:
Live by the sword...
Like corporations, guns are people too.
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/nra_board_member_threatened_lawsuit_over_arizona_gun_buyback/
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/nra_board_member_threatened_lawsuit_over_arizona_gun_buyback/
JFC. Next thing you know they will be protesting the closure of steel plants to protect the rights of unborn guns.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/10/16449709-student-shoots-two-at-california-high-school-sheriff-says?lite
normally, one could think, "at least there weren't any little kids involved", but this is CA. i'm sure there was a packed nursery on campus
normally, one could think, "at least there weren't any little kids involved", but this is CA. i'm sure there was a packed nursery on campus
blinded the shooter with science?
ftfy
Taft. 
Gawd, I don't miss the valley at all.
Gawd, I don't miss the valley at all.
one of those stories got to me:
http://m.news9.com/story.aspx?story=20353707&catId=112032
srsly? you (presumably) know a 3 year old is going to be there, or at least have the ability to put the tool away when gets in the door. who just leaves a loaded gun (safety off!) laying around where a 3yo can grab it?
asshole
like an idiot, i filtered those results by kids
http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/20405078/harrison-toddler-dies-from-shooting
years.
old.
http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/20405078/harrison-toddler-dies-from-shooting
2.
years.
old.
I bet they considered themselves responsible gun owners too.
Like the rest of them...
Like the rest of them...
Yea. I quit looking pretty quickly.
Liability can go a long way in prevention. The US has lax industrial safety standards compared to the rest of the industrial world as our litigious society drives safety. A gun owner should be treated as though their finger pulled the trigger every-time that weapon is shot.
Just thought Id drop this here...
Little bit off topic but kinda relavant since the report said men in the US are twenty times more likely to be killed by firearms then in other countries...
Little bit off topic but kinda relavant since the report said men in the US are twenty times more likely to be killed by firearms then in other countries...
Last edited:
like the rest of who?
dont generalize actual responsible gun owners with morons like that.
Thats not what Im saying. Ive just never heard anyone say "Im an irrisponsible gunowner".
This is why i redeem the whole "responsible gunowner argument" invalid unless you actually enforce very strict rules and go and do unexpected checks in houses of gunowners.
If this doesnt seem plausible theres only two options. Either you live with the fact that people will be killed by guns.
Or you ban guns.
Since the US is a democracy why not let the people decide through a referendum or something? Id be curious to see how many people would vote Pro Gun.
This is why i redeem the whole "responsible gunowner argument" invalid unless you actually enforce very strict rules and go and do unexpected checks in houses of gunowners.
If this doesnt seem plausible theres only two options. Either you live with the fact that people will be killed by guns.
Or you ban guns.
Since the US is a democracy why not let the people decide through a referendum or something? Id be curious to see how many people would vote Pro Gun.
Last edited:
I don't think anybody is even talking about gun security legislation to keep guns out of the hands of children.
Worst. Unprecedented Assault on the 2nd Amendment. Evar.
unexpected checks in people's houses? the murder rate will sky rocket if people unexpectedly show up in people's houses.the government doesnt want the people to vote on this issue, thats blatantly apparent....hell, according to reports, the guy in office doesnt even want to wait for Congress to do something, he might just make up his own laws through executive orders/actions and bypass the whole democratic process.
^^^^
I do think we will see some gun related initiatives on state ballots in 2014. We will also see more of a distinction in candidate platforms that is more stark than our usual Pro Gun vs. I Don't Want To Talk About It.
Gun nuts - November 2012 said:
I will give you the point on house checks. That would be a fvck up of epic proportions.Gun nuts - January 2013 said:
I do think we will see some gun related initiatives on state ballots in 2014. We will also see more of a distinction in candidate platforms that is more stark than our usual Pro Gun vs. I Don't Want To Talk About It.
the first step is to educate people!
Just a couple of pussies who get their kicks from intimidating random strangers. These are the type that would be too scared to protect themselves with their mind and their fists, but act tough if they have a gun. Fvck them !
My ex said "If this would have happened in Medford, nobody would have cared".
I said "But if they would have been people of color in Medford, they would have been shot".
These dilholes drove 200 miles to pull this crap in MY neighborhood. I'm not sure what it takes to revoke a concealed carry permit but using a gun to intimidate and provoke people ought to be enough. They obviously are lacking when it comes to responsible decision making.
Fixed that for you.
I'm pretty sure that's harder to do than shoot them. Also I'm yet to see 10+ people being killed in a non gun killing spree.
probably. a candidate will somehow find a way to exploit the whole situation and somehow turn it into their favor (or so theyd like to think.)
there are a ton of videos of people on youtube open carrying their rifles and "assault rifles" just to prove a point. while i do support open carry and concealed carry of a handgun, walking around with a long gun and video taping the incidents is pretty fvcking moronic
It's reassuring to know these two morons aren't unique among permit carrying (aka 'the responsible') gun owners.
it a lot of states you dont need a license to open carry even with a long arm.
while these particular people maybe arent the brightest bulb in the pack, it doesnt particularly mean they are irresponsible. their way of trying to "educate" people probably isnt the way most of us would do it but they are infact pushing the limit of what "irresponsible" is