Not an argument from my side. Truth is truth, a gun cannot kill someone because it is a gun. It can only kill someone if a person makes a conditional decision. Guns cannot get there own ammo, aim themselves and ultimately choose when and what to shoot unless enabled by a person making a choice. This has nothing to do with the right to bear arms, it is about the choices people make and responsibility. Fact is, humans are the weapon because people have the ability to turn things (almost anything) into tools or weapons. How we use these things some times has little to do with why they exist or what they are dasigned for. If not guns to shoot we would still stick into, throw at, beat, punch, kick.......with anything we could get our hands on to inflick pain and damage to others as a means of controle or domination. We are humans, that is what we do, sometimes on large scale. Believe what you want but strip away all the tech, religion, politics.......we are just a buch of animals. Smart ones because we can manipulate things but still..........ohio said:Sure a car can become a deadly weapon in the hands of the wrong person, but we tolerate that danger because of the utility of having cars for their intended purpose. That is a very different object than a gun.
I think oddly-shaped rocks are a better example. In the hands of the wrong person they can become deadly weapons and have no real utility to society, but it would take too much effort required to rid the country or world of them. Except it's much easier to kill someone with a gun.
This is not a statement for or against right to bear arms. I just think that your argument sucks.