Man that cliff from the rockshelf turn. Messy it would be.I don’t know about the tire?
My first thought is they need safety nets on a couple of those turns,it would be Death if they went over. It could happen.
The Track was Great. Nasty Steep Sharp Blind with nice Berms.
Great Race,Top 10 was just like UCI to me? Just Insane. Heart pumpin shit.
Avy
I dont even think people mind technical, I just think the track wasn't even enjoyable. You've nailed what it really needs, need sot go back to about 03 ish tracks when shit was new and technical. even fort william was better then than it is now!Mine too Avy. When Glencoe DH track here was first built it was a major step up in technicality to any other UK track. I was there for a few early dig/ride days in preparation for its use as a Scottish race venue. There was one sketchy kinda rough bermed corner that had the possibility of spitting a rider over and down a natural ravine/waterfall. I witnessed Rhuardh Cunningham come into it at warp speed but get bucked on the entrance and ultimately get him and his bike spat over the back. Luckily they didn't roll too far (death). But a fuck off rock came with him and pinned his bike to the hill. Subsequently that corner got a wooden barrier built around it.
To this day not too many people ride that track. Especially since they built a far easier alternative.
Shoot me. But what WC racing needs is genuinely technical slower speed sections (think the Leogang section Reece skooled everyone on) Rather than one line death to one side shit! and fest sized rhythm sections or Rampage size gaps. Those actually dilute the "racing"
The main problem with Fort William has always been what there is there to work with… both gradient and sustainable terrain. You can only do so much bringing in materials up top and there’s not a lot more you could build really except that motorway when you have such a long distance with very little gradient from the good stuff to the finish. Do you remember the OG track which finished at the other side of the car park?
Unpopular opinion but I’ve been saying for well over a decade Ft Bill shouldn’t have been chosen as a WC venue every single year. Not unless the WC was to increase the No of rounds to double figures and become a truly international series.#Nevergonnahappen
Warner said he was in the top 20 in one of the WC races. The South American riders do not get the same support as the Euro-Mericans.the super techgnar upper section was rad. some eye opening full sends down a couple of those faces. would love to see wcdh with more stuff like this. the 90' gaps, as insane as they sound on paper, get a bit meh after a while, and given they have to be hit at pretty much a set speed, the actual racing takes place in the gnurrr.
also - impressive result from juanfer (who i've never heard of previously). kid needs to hit the wc circuit.
I'm actually surprised how much of a time difference can be made on the "boring" bits like the Ft Bill and Leogang motorways. It just looks like they're all doing the same thing but there's a surprising difference. Still boring though.the super techgnar upper section was rad. some eye opening full sends down a couple of those faces. would love to see wcdh with more stuff like this. the 90' gaps, as insane as they sound on paper, get a bit meh after a while, and given they have to be hit at pretty much a set speed, the actual racing takes place in the gnurrr.
also - impressive result from juanfer (who i've never heard of previously). kid needs to hit the wc circuit.
That first year tho, there was a ton of mud on the track and no grip then throw in the steep and mud on the rocks and you got it.I’ve always liked the “technicality” of the proper DH track at Glencoe and actually do find it a fun track to ride. I’ve never raced it though. And honestly wouldn’t ever have wanted to.
at the first SDAs held there I was runner for the timing. And during practice I’d never seen so many folk back in civvies before lunch time. Plenty of them decent enough riders. At the time it confused me.but looking back now I can kinda understand it a little more. Not exactly a forgiving place.
Yeah. I know. I probably did more runs than anyone else there that weekend. By the last few runs on race day I was so tired (mentally as well as physically) I left the track multiple times. Nearly taking out spectators, a marshal and a photographer a a few times. Being timing runner for many years meant I’d generally ride well within my comfort zone because on certain tracks I’d often be doing up to 12 full runs on race day. It was easily possible to do that many at Ae, Aberfeldy, Glencoe and Ft bill as I didn’t need to wait in line like everyone else and uplift was so efficient at those tracks.That first year tho, there was a ton of mud on the track and no grip then throw in the steep and mud on the rocks and you got it.
Was defo hard to ride never mind race!
Pulling faster lines out the bag on race run rarely happens anymore. And it isn’t entirely unconnected to the mtb media’s obsession with pre-race track over analysis. That and fucking stupid semis. Or whatever they’re called.Tech shit is where someone *gasp* might even take adifferentslower line.
Media has evolved into dissecting every story so the average Joe feels he's able to mimic it, or at least "live the experience".Pulling faster lines out the bag on race run rarely happens anymore. And it isn’t entirely unconnected to the mtb media’s obsession with pre-race track over analysis. That and fucking stupid semis. Or whatever they’re called.
Gary,I too thought Jm’s post was stupid. However,”faster lines out of the bag” happen way more than rarely my Brother. Time and Time again I have seen this. Not sure what you are talking about here?Pulling faster lines out the bag on race run rarely happens anymore. And it isn’t entirely unconnected to the mtb media’s obsession with pre-race track over analysis. That and fucking stupid semis. Or whatever they’re called.
Defo doesnt happen when you've got the shit tracks that they ride year in year out now.Pulling faster lines out the bag on race run rarely happens anymore. And it isn’t entirely unconnected to the mtb media’s obsession with pre-race track over analysis. That and fucking stupid semis. Or whatever they’re called.
Of course I did,dont know why you say this? Would you like a SubPrime Breakdown?With respect @Avy. Did you even watch the (whole) race this time?
asking tons of @Avy questions post race in WC race threads having clearly not watched.course I did,dont know why you say this?
I would have been in Shock if you did not answer that correct. I knew you would,but just letting you know that Avy was on it.asking tons of @Avy questions post race in WC race threads having clearly not watched.
If I understood your second question properly. Adam Brayton. Do I win a prize?
In all honesty Hardline Wales doesn't really hold my interest like a WC race does. Probably because I don't really see it as legit racing with its odd choice of invited riders. I only really watched this one because I miss Warner's DH commentary.
Not always. But definitely far more regularly since the new WC DH management stepped in..
You always say that Gary, “I’m really not that into this”, but you are Brother. Or,as they say in America, “But ya are Blanch”. You are on it,like a Bonnet Brother. No worries.
Yes I agree Gary that Hardline is not the same as UCI. However,It Hold’s Avy’s interest. The Riders are Top Notch,the whole Gang. A Mix that they have done very well on picking.asking tons of @Avy questions post race in WC race threads having clearly not watched.
If I understood your second question properly. Adam Brayton. Do I win a prize?
In all honesty Hardline Wales doesn't really hold my interest like a WC race does. Probably because I don't really see it as legit racing with its odd choice of invited riders. I only really watched this one because I miss Warner's DH commentary.
see. Here we’re going to have to disagree.The Riders are Top Notch,the whole Gang. A Mix that they have done very well on picking.
Are you not entertained?Is it a race? Or just a spectacle? Because some of those “top notch” riders simply aren’t even elite level racers. And who’s “picked” probably definitely isn’t down to the criteria you seem to think it is. And looking at the event as a race this makes the whole thing a bit of a farce IMO.
The women’s “race” even more so. Clue: There isn’t actually a woman's race at all. Just a PC media PR stunt!
Not as much as I’d have liked. No. I did already explain this…and why. *sigh*Are you not entertained?
defining it simply allowed me to explain to @Avy why I personally find Hardline less entertaining than (pre discovery) UCI DH races. If pushed I’d probably liken Hardline to the South American street DH races. Which I also find less entertaining to watch. But no. I’m not really that bothered how you’d define those either.Who cares how you define it? Why does it need to fix into some neat category? This may be blasphemy (particularly here in the DH forum), but UCI DH racing is also a made-up spectacle for our entertainment.
It's easy to be reductive, isn't it? I didn't see anything new at recent DH races either. Oh...yeah, some people went fast down a hill.Don’t get me wrong here. The riding and riders are obviously extremely high level and highly impressive. But really. Was there anything new to see on race day? Oh… yeah. Brayton (who placed a fair way off the winning time) did a rock huck.
Split personality?Well this last page of the thread is fuckin mad, Avy why do you refer to yourself in 3rd person?
And he signs off every post like Liam Gallacher does on twitter.Split personality?