Quantcast

Has America come full circle? (religious persecution)

DirtyDog

Gang probed by the Golden Banana
Aug 2, 2005
6,598
0
BurlyShirley said:
Imagine that. The majority is electing people they share beleifs with in a representative democracy. Amazing.
The issue is that the majority would like to impose their beliefs on the minority. That has already been stated in this thread, but you are selectively reading as usual.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Silver said:
That's cool. No more bitching about Hamas, ok?
I could give a rats ass if they have a fundamentalist govt. in other countries. It's their country, they can do what they want. When they start overstepping their bounds, well, thats why we have so many guns.

Jesus vs. Allah, round #88
 

laura

DH_Laura
Jul 16, 2002
6,259
15
Glitter Gulch
BurlyShirley said:
This thread is retarded. Anyone that thinks religion plays MORE of a role now than it did 100 years ago is a RETARD.

i feel as long as we aren't burning people at the stake, we have made progress.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
BeerDemon said:
The issue is that the majority would like to impose their beliefs on the minority. That has already been stated in this thread, but you are selectively reading as usual.
Not being selective, just starting at the end cause Im lazy. Its already been said as well that there are laws in place so that beliefs CANT be imposed via govt. There is nothing you can do to stop people from voiting for those that share their beleifs. Im not a xtian, but I manage to deal w/ it just fine. What's wrong with the rest of you?
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
I could give a rats ass if they have a fundamentalist govt. in other countries. It's their country, they can do what they want. When they start overstepping their bounds, well, thats why we have so many guns.

Jesus vs. Allah, round #88
And we would be Jesus in that statement?

So, now you are equating the US with Jesus?
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
laura said:
i feel as long as we aren't burning people at the stake, we have made progress.
Exactly. There are TONS of examples where religion played a much more significant role than it does today. You cant even pray before a football game or graduation anymore, and you're trying to tell me the fundies have taken over? Riighgght. :rolleyes:
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
Not being selective, just starting at the end cause Im lazy. Its already been said as well that there are laws in place so that beliefs CANT be imposed via govt. There is nothing you can do to stop people from voiting for those that share their beleifs. Im not a xtian, but I manage to deal w/ it just fine. What's wrong with the rest of you?
[my emphasis]
Maybe that's why you "deal w/ it just fine?"

Yes, there are laws, but those laws are not necessarily enforced correctly. For instance, the fact that we have mentions of god on our currency.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
And we would be Jesus in that statement?

So, now you are equating the US with Jesus?
Did you YOURSELF not say that the govt. is largely elected christians? Or are you failing to make a simple connection?
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
[my emphasis]
Maybe that's why you "deal w/ it just fine?"

Yes, there are laws, but those laws are not necessarily enforced correctly. For instance, the fact that we have mentions of god on our currency.
Awwwwwwww. Little words on the currency hurt your feelings? That's so precious.
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
Did you YOURSELF not say that the govt. is largely elected christians? Or are you failing to make a simple connection?
So you have no problem then in framing any hostilities between us and the countries of the M.E. as a religious war?
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
Awwwwwwww. Little words on the currency hurt your feelings? That's so precious.
I never said they hurt my feelings. Your pathetic little attempt to bait me is simply that, pathetic. It's about my rights and the rights of all the citizens of the US.

Edit: IOW, this is a legal discussion. If you don't have the requisite skills to keep up, then bow out. And, if this thread is so retarded as you put it, then go somewhere else. No one is forcing you to read this or to respond. It's pretty retarded to stay in here if it bothers you so much.
 

DirtyDog

Gang probed by the Golden Banana
Aug 2, 2005
6,598
0
BurlyShirley said:
Not being selective, just starting at the end cause Im lazy. Its already been said as well that there are laws in place so that beliefs CANT be imposed via govt. There is nothing you can do to stop people from voiting for those that share their beleifs. Im not a xtian, but I manage to deal w/ it just fine. What's wrong with the rest of you?

I'm sure that as a white college aged person you are subjected to persecution on a regular basis :rolleyes: When you grow up a bit, and learn more about the world, you will realize that your own experiences in your insulated little world do not represent the experiences of most people in this country.

However, I suspect that you just don't care. Obviously, what is good enough for Burley, is good enough for everyone.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
So you have no problem then in framing any hostilities between us and the countries of the M.E. as a religious war?
Considering that one side supports a religion which demands conversion or death to people of OTHER religions? No. Not at all.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
BeerDemon said:
I'm sure that as a white college aged person you are subjected to persecution on a regular basis :rolleyes: When you grow up a bit, and learn more about the world, you will realize that your own experiences in your insulated little world do not represent the experiences of most people in this country.

However, I suspect that you just don't care. Obviously, what is good enough for Burley, is good enough for everyone.
While its true that I dont really care about others, I do get annoyed by wasted effort. For instance, this argument. Christians (the majority of the country) arent going to vote for atheists. As part of a country where I DONT feel persecution, I must say, Im pretty happy with it. As an atheist, no one gives me any ****. Once in a while some nutjob will try to talk me into a life of jesus, but I quickly put an end to such things. No biggie.
 

DirtyDog

Gang probed by the Golden Banana
Aug 2, 2005
6,598
0
BurlyShirley said:
While its true that I dont really care about others, I do get annoyed by wasted effort. For instance, this argument. Christians (the majority of the country) arent going to vote for atheists. As part of a country where I DONT feel persecution, I must say, Im pretty happy with it. As an atheist, no one gives me any ****. Once in a while some nutjob will try to talk me into a life of jesus, but I quickly put an end to such things. No biggie.
A reasonable response, but again I'm not talking about WHO's in office. I'm talking about those people in office respecting the rights of the minorities in this country.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
BeerDemon said:
A reasonable response, but again I'm not talking about WHO's in office. I'm talking about those people in office respecting the rights of the minorities in this country.
There is a gay dude that I work with. The other day I called roller blades "Fruit Boots" during a conversation with him without thinking. Later I said, "hey man, sorry about the uh, fruit reference" and he said something to the effect of "I can tell if something is malicious or not. No worries"
I guess I share a feeling similar in that, I recognize I live in a xtian country as he lives in a straight world. Things will be said, but they mostly dont matter.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
89,434
27,657
media blackout
Old Man G Funk said:
How many atheists serve in our federal government? How many do you think could get elected? How many teachers have complained that they are pressured to gloss over evolution because they might offend parents' sensibilities? How many abortion clinics are under protest daily? How many gay marriage bans have been enacted? Why is "under god" in the pledge of allegiance? Why is god on our currency? Etc. etc. etc.

One of the main problems is that the Xtians are trying to create laws to re-inforce their religious beliefs. Like outlawing abortion, banning gay marriage are two of the major ones that come to mind. You don't like abortions? Don't have one. Don't want gays getting married? Surprise! don't marry someone of the same gender. Also teaching abstinence as the foundation of sex education.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
jonKranked said:
One of the main problems is that the Xtians are trying to create laws to re-inforce their religious beliefs. Like outlawing abortion, banning gay marriage are two of the major ones that come to mind. You don't like abortions? Don't have one. Don't want gays getting married? Surprise! don't marry someone of the same gender. Also teaching abstinence as the foundation of sex education.
Dude, if you think ANY of those things has a CHANCE IN HELL of becoming law, you're wrong. Totally wrong.

EDIT: I should clarify. There wont be any const. ammendment against gay marriage. That it hasnt been made legal YET is a sign of the voting populace NOT the politicians themselves. They do whatever we say for votes.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
BeerDemon said:
A reasonable response, but again I'm not talking about WHO's in office. I'm talking about those people in office respecting the rights of the minorities in this country.

Judging by the views of you and your fellow liberals in here, I highly doubt you would be a tolerant majority if Christians were in the minority here in the US...
 

DirtyDog

Gang probed by the Golden Banana
Aug 2, 2005
6,598
0
N8 said:
Judging by the views of you and your fellow liberals in here, I highly doubt you would be a tolerant majority if Christians were in the minority here in the US...
Can you cite some specific examples?
 

Secret Squirrel

There is no Justice!
Dec 21, 2004
8,150
1
Up sh*t creek, without a paddle
N8 said:
Judging by the views of you and your fellow liberals in here, I highly doubt you would be a tolerant majority if Christians were in the minority here in the US...
I'm too ambivolent towards religious minorities to care.....

It's when they get to be the majority and start force feeding the minorities the crap they see as filet mignon that issues arise. Obviously, you don't pay any attention to anyone's posts beyond filing it under "Liberal Jibba-Jabba".....
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,415
22,507
Sleazattle
BeerDemon said:
Can you cite some specific examples?
C'mon you'd opress the hell out of them. Make them take floating holidays at Christmas, refuse to give their freaky family status any legal recognition and send folks knocking on their doors forcing crazy ideas like science down their throat. Amnesty international would be all over your ass.
 

DirtyDog

Gang probed by the Golden Banana
Aug 2, 2005
6,598
0
Westy said:
C'mon you'd opress the hell out of them. Make them take floating holidays at Christmas, refuse to give their freaky family status any legal recognition and send folks knocking on their doors forcing crazy ideas like science down their throat. Amnesty international would be all over your ass.
Yeah I suppose that's true.
 
jonKranked said:
One of the main problems is that the Xtians are trying to create laws to re-inforce their religious beliefs. Like outlawing abortion, banning gay marriage are two of the major ones that come to mind. You don't like abortions? Don't have one. Don't want gays getting married? Surprise! don't marry someone of the same gender. Also teaching abstinence as the foundation of sex education.
Exactly. I really care not about prayers before football games, etc.. since they honestly don't have any terrible human consequences (except maybe people of other religions feeling left out). When there are true health or human consequences I see a problem (see stem cell thread).

interesting that all the issues quoted above relate in some way to sex....;)
 

JohnE

filthy rascist
May 13, 2005
13,563
2,210
Front Range, dude...
Just remember this when you VOTE in a couple years. All the hypocrisy, lies, back dooring and money spent. Not to mentiont he war we were thrown into by some people who "had better things to do" (Dick Cheney) when their generation was fighting another unpopular war in Viet Nam...
Throw the bastards out, so we can have some new ones to hate.
 

Silver

find me a tampon
Jul 20, 2002
10,840
1
Orange County, CA
This one fits in well with the stem cell discussion...all they need to do is mention the 30 other embryos that "died" so that the lady could squirt out a bunch of Jesus' little miracles...

 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
Hmmm, I don't want to follow those excellent cartoons, but I found this article in the Post yesterday.

Yesterday's House debate on same-sex marriage was pure dead horse: The Senate last month rejected -- emphatically -- a constitutional amendment that would allow Congress to ban same-sex marriage, so there was zero chance the amendment could be approved this year. But members of the House were answering to a Higher Authority.

"It's part of God's plan for the future of mankind," explained Rep. John Carter (R-Tex.).

Rep. Bob Beauprez (R- Colo.) also found "the very hand of God" at work. "We best not be messing with His plan."

Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) agreed that "it wasn't our idea, it was God's."

"I think God has spoken very clearly on this issue," said Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.), a mustachioed gynecologist who served as one of the floor leaders yesterday. When somebody quarreled with this notion, Gingrey replied: "I refer the gentleman to the Holy Scriptures."
So, the "Holy Scriptures" are a point used in debate in the US House of Representatives now?

Here's another excerpt...
"Marriage is not about love," volunteered Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), who noted his 31 years of matrimony. "It's about a love that can bear children."

"The world did not start with Adam and Steve," Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) told reporters.

Gingrey, the floor leader/gynecologist, posited that the debate was "about values and how this great country represents them to the world." After the vote, he elaborated: "This is probably the best message we can give to the Middle East in regards to the trouble we are having over there right now."

So that was it: The marriage debate wasn't about amending the Constitution; it was about quieting Hezbollah.