you've got balls.....this big.....Even lived in baltimore for 3 years.
you've got balls.....this big.....Even lived in baltimore for 3 years.
Now you're just being deliberately and semantically obtuse.What you're describing is racIST-tolerant. Not the same thing.
So tell me, do racists strangers that you encounter feel comfortable spewing slurs against blacks simply because you share the same skin color ?
could it be the lack of properly made sweet tea?The funny part is how much ranting and raving about minorities you get and there just aren't any around
It's OK Rick Perry was a DEMOCRAT at that time he didn't switch parties till 1989.The Washington Post reported on Sunday that at least seven people it interviewed said the name for a portion of the property, Nxggerhead, was visible on the rock at the entrance “at different points in the 1980s and 1990s,” and that a former worker said he believed he had seen it as recently as three years ago.
There is also ZERO evidence that he attempted to do anything about the name of the camp after he owned it, or that he's even smart enough to have realized that somebody might find the name "Niggerhead" offensive we he startedThere is ZERO evidence that Rick Perry had anything to do with or in any way support the name of the camp which was named years before he or his family had anything to do with it.
FACT DEAL WITH IT.
Nope. I like to let stupid posts lie...Somebody dropped their stupid.
Anybody wanna pick that up?
Neither the Texas Constitution, nor the Constitution of the united States, explicitly or implicitly disallows the secession of Texas (or any other "free and independent State") from the United States. Joining the "Union" was ever and always voluntary, rendering voluntary withdrawal an equally lawful and viable option (regardless of what any self-appointed academic, media, or government "experts"—including Abraham Lincoln himself—may have ever said).
Both the original (1836) and the current (1876) Texas Constitutions also state that "All political power is inherent in the people ... they have at all times the inalienable right to alter their government in such manner as they might think proper."
One last note...Texas is a right to work state.Could an independent Texas survive economically? The facts say 'Yes'
The Texas economy is the largest one that's still growing in the U.S., and in 2006 the state was home of six of the top 50 companies on the Fortune 500 list and 58 of the top 500 -- the most of any state. In 2008, the state had a Gross Domestic Product of $1.245 trillion, second-largest in the U.S. and 15th-largest in the world.
Texas currently conducts more than $150 billion a year in trade with other nations; it leads all other states in exports, and has for five consecutive years. In 2005, per-capita domestic production in Texas was $42,975 per person.
Texas has the second-largest workforce in the nation, some 11 million citizen workers, and an unemployment rate among the lowest in the U.S. The reason for that: the state government has made economic development a priority in recent years, and has helped create a favorable business climate for companies looking to relocate. Texas also eschews a state-level income tax on prooductivity and its real-estate prices compared to other states and regions remains largely undervalued.
Texas leads the nation in the production of beef, oil and natural gas. It also leads the nation in both the production of alternative energy and in the construction of new alternative energy productin facilities; an independent Texas would be completely energy-independent and among the world's leading exporters of oil, natural gas and energy products.
Texas also has a thriving lumber industry based in the eastern part of the state, while the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex is a key center for the defense industry, a banking center and the information technology industry. Texas is the nation's No.2 manufacturer of computers, components and electronmic equipment.
The Houston/Beaumont area features the world's largest concentration of petrochemical refining and production facilities, and Houston is a major center of medical and biomedical research, aerospace research and shipping. The Port of Houston is the largest port in the nation and sixth-largest in the world.
Texas is also a leader in the production of cement, crushed stone, lime, salt and sand and gravel.
The state is also among the world's leaders in the production of rice and cotton, primarily along the Gulf Coast, and in the production of citrus products in the Rio Grande Valley. Texas features the most farms, both in terms of numbers and in acreage, in the nation.
In addition to cattle, Texas also leads nationally in the production of sheep and goats. The Texas Panhandle and South Plains has also become a major producer of cereal crops.
Texas agricuture is also a leader in the production of greenhouse and nursery products, corn, hay and wheat. The state ranks No.2 in the nation in the production of sorghum. Peanuts and sugar cane are other valuable crops, along with onions, potatoes, watermelons and grapefruit. Texas farmers lead the nation in the production of cabbage.
Texas has another brand of famrer as well: Texas' fishing industry thrives. The state is among the nation's leaders in its annual shrimp catch, and both commercial and sport fishing are major industries. In addition, there is a growing commercial catfish-farming industry.
Clearly, Texas features an economy which would enable an independent republic to thrive.
The rest of America really needs to call them out on this one day and say either sack up and do it or shut the fvck up about it.By the way...Texas has the right to secede
Seriously. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out Texas.The rest of America really needs to call them out on this one day and say either sack up and do it or shut the fvck up about it.
Y'all need us more than we need you. You forget Texas was it's own country from 1836–1846 before we decided to join the union.Seriously. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out Texas.
I think you said it bestTexas Secede!
Talk is cheap actions speak louder than words
AAS: Between the Texas Constitution, the U.S. Constitution and the Joint Resolution Annexing Texas to the United States of 1845, there is no explicit right for the state to return to its days as a Republic, said Sanford Levinson, a professor at the School of Law at University of Texas-Austin.
"We actually fought a war over this issue, and there is no possibility whatsoever that the United States or any court would recognize a "right" to secede," Levinson wrote in an e-mail.
http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/8425/can-texas-secede-from-the-union-noYes, Texas could be drawn and quartered to become 5 total states within the Union. But Texas as a state, nor any of those subdivided states may secede from the Union.
Oh you. Stop it with your "facts". Your just going to confuse the poor little rich man.This from me...a former Texan, with family still in Texas...
Well, regardless of how Rick Perry feels, and the fact that we fought a war back in the 1800's that kind of settled the issue, and the fact that a 5-3 Supreme Court decision kind of settled the issue, well, you get the point.
http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/8425/can-texas-secede-from-the-union-no
So, in short, for all that email chain copy and paste about Texas owns NASA, MD Anderson, biggest miltia, etc, for all that, no, Texas cannot secede from the US.
No, we haven't forgotten. You all have such fragile ego's that it seems necessary for you to remind everyone at any given opportunity how "independent" and "tough" you are. And for someone who claims to be so interested in FACTS, how is it that your Job growth number is off by 30%?Y'all need us more than we need you. You forget Texas was it's own country from 1836–1846 before we decided to join the union.
Texas has realized 70% of all new U.S. Job Growth since 2008. Texas also has the greatest proportion of the country's 500 largest companies headquartered there (65, compared with 56 in New York and 51 in California).
Texas sure seems like Randian third world utopia to me, where do I sign up?The Perry campaign is giving the startling statistic that since June 2009, 40% of the net new jobs created in America have been in Texas—a state with less than 10% of the nation's people.http://www.economist.com/node/21526209
I mean, Jeebus, even The Economist questions whether or not what Perry has done to Texas has been worth the social costs. Since your obviously not much of a reader I'll point out that The Economist isn't really known for its harboring of Left Wing militants and socialists.Consider the Texas that Perry holds up to the rest of the nation for admiration. It has the fourth-highest poverty rate of any state. It tied with Mississippi last year for the highest percentage of workers in minimum-wage jobs. It ranks first in adults without high school diplomas. Twenty-six percent of Texans have no health insurance — the highest percentage of medically uninsured residents of any state. It leads the nation in the percentage of children who lack medical insurance. Texas has an inordinate number of employers who provide no insurance to their workers, partly because insurance rates are high, thanks to an absence of regulations.
Perry seems quite comfortable with the state’s lagging performance in what we might term the pursuit-of-happiness index. Consider his indifference toward education: In 2008, the state comptroller found that 12 percent of Texans lacked high school diplomas and that the level would rise to 30 percent by 2040 unless the state’s commitment to education was considerably increased. This year, though, when confronted with a $27 billion budget deficit, Perry did not raise taxes but instead slashed $4 billion from K-12 schools.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-sad-facts-behind-rick-perrys-texas-miracle/2011/08/16/gIQAxc3zJJ_story.html
As for "liberals" moving to Texas, it only seems fair considering how many mouth breathing retards y'all sent to California, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico in the late 70's and early 80's, not to mention the one you sent to DC in 2001.Now, clearly, the virtues of this approach are debatable. It may be that cutting taxes and regulations and services is a good way to attract business but a bad thing to do, on balance, because it leaves you less money for health care and education and infrastructure—areas where Texas lags the nation as a whole, and indeed, if nothing else, areas where the state must do better if it is going to have a worthwhile economy in the future. And I certainly don't mean to endorse Mr Perry's approach; personally, I have a lot of problems with it, although I do think the unemployment rate is a key measure of social welfare. But if we're talking strictly about job creation, Mr Perry has a good pitch. He deserves partial credit for Texas's job growth, just as he deserves partial blame for the state's stagnation on other metrics.
http://www.economist.com/node/21526209
Texas has enjoyed an unequaled economic boom the past 10 years.
The inventory of private-sector jobs in Texas increased by 732,800 between April 2001 and the same month this year, according to an On Numbers analysis of new federal employment data.
No other state registered an increase of more than 100,000 private-sector jobs during the decade. Only 19 states and the District of Columbia posted any gains at all.
See the bottom of this story for a state-by-state breakdown of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Texas avoided the real-estate bust that decimated the economies of several large Sunbelt states, including California and Florida, during the 2008-2010 recession. It consequently was positioned for a faster takeoff once the national economy began improving, allowing it to create 251,700 new jobs in the past year alone.
And almost 600,000 of those jobs went to aliens, both legal and illegal.My advice to anti-Perry advocates is this: Give up talking about Texas jobs. Texas is an incredible outlier among the states when it comes to jobs. Not only are they creating them, they're creating ones with higher wages.
FACT and PROOF
http://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/on-numbers/scott-thomas/2011/05/texas-adds-732800-jobs-in-10-years.html
Texas adds 732,800 jobs in 10 years; no other state tops 100,000
Next talking point you need debunked?The non-partisan group found that newly-arrived immigrants claimed 81% of state job growth from 2007 to 2011. What's worse, half of those immigrants were illegal -- representing 40% of state growth.
Rick Perry is S O F T on illegal immigration here in Texas I like how you just assumed I was a Rick Perry fan.And almost 600,000 of those jobs went to aliens, both legal and illegal.Next talking point you need debunked?
Actually, it did. Unless you happen to think its good old fashioned conservative values that placed all that oil in the ground.Texas somehow just lucked into having the strongest economy in the nation again…
The Lone Star State is home to 64 Fortune 500 companies, more than any other state, in a wide variety of industries. So while the state’s last win in 2008 came with oil at a record $145 a barrel—a natural tailwind for the largest industry in Texas—the state managed to do even better this year despite the fact that oil is trading at roughly half that price.
Washington Post Staff Writer Who Wrote Rick Perry Attack Piece Has Criminal Past
Posted by mikerobinsonpc (Profile)
Wednesday, October 5th at 12:56PM EDT
On October 1, 2011, the Washington Posts Stephanie McCrummen authored a story for publication in the Post concerning Texas Governor Perrys lease of a hunting spot with an offensive name. Although a careful read of the story shows that there is no substantiation for the allegations of racism, Ms. McCrummen, the Post, and MSNBC have held a non-stop witch hunt, accusing Mr. Perry of everything under the sun. So, lets examine the author using the same journalistic standards practiced by the Washington Post.
Ms. McCrummen has a rather interesting criminal history herself, as public criminal records in multiple states stretching across 4 time zones have shown.
Ms. McCrummens criminal history began with North Carolina Case # 1992 CR 00654, a violation of the Article 19 False Pretenses and Cheats section of the North Carolina Criminal Code. Ms. McCrummen was convicted of a crime punishable by up to six months of imprisonment for writing a hot check that was deemed worthless.
In 2005, the apparently unrepentant Ms. McCrummen was again found guilty in the 2005 Virginia Case #059GT0504714900 for failing to obey a highway sign.
The following year, McCrummen was found guilty in yet another Virginia criminal case, #153GT0604021200, speeding 46 miles an hour in a 25 mile speed zone.
Last year, in August, 2010, Ms. McCrummen was found guilty in Arizona Case # M-07510TR-2010025209 of speeding once again. She plead guilty but failed to pay the fine imposed by the court and returned to Washington having skipped out on paying her fine to the criminal court. A collection review was held in September, after she had escaped Arizonas jurisdiction to D.C., and her case was assigned to the Fines/Fees and Restitution Enforcement (FARE) Program established to collect delinquent court ordered restitution, fines, fees, and surcharges . After the FARE team tracked her down at her Washington D.C. apartment, they finally appeared to get her attention and on October 23, 2010 she paid the defaulted fine to the criminal court, almost two months after her conviction. McCrummen has now found herself a four-time loser in the states criminal courts. She currently resides outside of the jurisdiction of the three states where she committed her crimes.
As you can see from this simple outline of Ms. Stephanie McCrummens past, under the Posts journalistic standards, it is pretty easy to throw mud on someone even if they didnt do anything truly wrong. Over the years, the journalistic standards of the Washington Post have fallen into a death spiral of innuendo and name calling, as seen in McCrummens ni**erhead story. They can create guilt out of thin air as we have in the public records concerning the Post Staff Writer in question. The Post should quit its despicable methodology of reporting the news. For now, Ms. McCrummen and the Post owe Governor Perry an apology.
Mike Robinson is Sr. Partner at Robinson & Henry P.C., a Castle Rock, CO Law Firm. Ph. 303-688-0944
What's Good for the Goose Is Good for the Gander.Traffic violations? Clearly a Freedom hating socialist! Hey Kitty, hows your driving record?
Are you Micheal A Robinson, or just a parrot? Since so far I haven't seen anything that would convince me you've thought of any of this stuff on your own.What's Good for the Goose Is Good for the Gander.
Wanna make up unsubstanative claims and accusations against Rick Perry well…prepare to have your skirt lifted also and in case you didn’t know writing hot checks is a crime it’s called stealing.
Yeah I realize looking at someone’s criminal record is cheesy but the same goes with trying to paint Rick Perry as a racist with absolutely no proof.
then why do you keep brining it up?racism in america is clearly dead.
he was bringing up a bunch of other idiots who brought it upthen why do you keep brining it up?
I'm fine with calling Perry a racist AND a dumbass, actually. You don't speak for mewhile we can't paint Perry a racist
Wouldn't dream of it. I choose not to associate with you dirty Canadians anyway. I might catch teh socialistic medicine.I'm fine with calling Perry a racist AND a dumbass, actually. You don't speak for me
Remember how much trouble Bill Cosby got it a couple years ago for saying pretty much the exact same thing?
bill is probably viewed by most as a uncle tom....Remember how much trouble Bill Cosby got it a couple years ago for saying pretty much the exact same thing?