TSA?Makes you wonder how many jobs are actually parasitic and contribute nothing of value to society.
unless you are having it rough getting fondled...
TSA?Makes you wonder how many jobs are actually parasitic and contribute nothing of value to society.
Isn't the bulk of the finance industry? Not the means of actually loaning money to industry, but the part that just makes stupid bets on financial things.Makes you wonder how many jobs are actually parasitic and contribute nothing of value to society.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/27/opinion/how-big-banks-became-our-masters.htmlIsn't the bulk of the finance industry? Not the means of actually loaning money to industry, but the part that just makes stupid bets on financial things.
It shouldn't for those of us on employer plans, at least those with non-shitty employers. Individual plan marketplaces will be wrecked, though, at least until some lawsuit can force a judge to put an injunction on this rule's implementation.I think this just cluster-effs everyone apart from federally insured jobs...
It shouldn't those of us on employer plans, at least those with non-shitty employers.
At what point, though, will insurers start to *really* stick it to the corporations which provide health insurance for their employees? And at what point will the corporations tell the insurers to fuck off and demand that something rational be done with national healthcare?It shouldn't those of us on employer plans, at least those with non-shitty employers. Individual plan marketplaces will be wrecked, though, at least until some lawsuit can force a judge to put an injunction on this rule's implementation.
Maine Republican Governor Paul LePage said on Wednesday he will not expand the state's Medicaid program under Obamacare, ignoring a ballot initiative widely backed by voters, calling it "ruinous" for the state's budget.
if he follows through on that he'll probably be removed from office
if he follows through on that he'll probably be removed from office
i saw another article where someone from the legislature basically said at this point if he tries to block it he's breaking the law and they'll let the judiciary handle it
Sounds right. He's elected to enact the will of the people. The people have spoken pretty clearly on this one. If he cannot perform his duties, he should polish up the old resume and find another career.i saw another article where someone from the legislature basically said at this point if he tries to block it he's breaking the law and they'll let the judiciary handle it
I've been saying this almost since this debate started, and this gets way into the weeds on the Democrats total inability to sell any idea, no matter how good it is. "Healthcare Reform" from day one should have been trotted out by the Dems as "Tri-care for all". We all love and support the troops, right?* Give them the best of everything, right? I'm convinced, tell the average, redstate, 'Murican voter they get the same healthcare as the troops they have such rock hard Freedom Boners® for, and it would have been a much easier sell.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/my-army-service-made-me-believe-in-universal-health-care/546974/
Hard to argue with that logic. But I guess this isn't a logical discussion in the first place, bring on the emotionally irrational!
I'd say maybe you should run for office, but I'm putting the odds at 2,000:1 that you don't make it through the first debate without a nuclear meltdown the likes of which this world has never seen.I've been saying this almost since this debate started, and this gets way into the weeds on the Democrats total inability to sell any idea, no matter how good it is. "Healthcare Reform" from day one should have been trotted out by the Dems as "Tri-care for all". We all love and support the troops, right?* Give them the best of everything, right? I'm convinced, tell the average, redstate, 'Murican voter they get the same healthcare as the troops they have such rock hard Freedom Boners® for, and it would have been a much easier sell.
*sarcasm heavily implied.
Those odds seem high to me.I'd say maybe you should run for office, but I'm putting the odds at 2000:1 that you don't make it through the first debate without nuclear meltdown the likes of which this world has never seen.
or....with a nod and a wink tell the average blue state murican you can keep your doctor and your insurance will get cheaper....I've been saying this almost since this debate started, and this gets way into the weeds on the Democrats total inability to sell any idea, no matter how good it is. "Healthcare Reform" from day one should have been trotted out by the Dems as "Tri-care for all". We all love and support the troops, right?* Give them the best of everything, right? I'm convinced, tell the average, redstate, 'Murican voter they get the same healthcare as the troops they have such rock hard Freedom Boners® for, and it would have been a much easier sell.
*sarcasm heavily implied.
It never had to be sold in blue states. This is what I was saying about Democratic messaging. "Keep your doctor" was about trying to bring in mouth breathers who in all likelihood didn't have private health care or a doctor in the first place. People who didn't want Government hands on their Medicare. Unlike some presidents* Obama at least admitted he was wrong. And people lost plans because those plans were shit. Progressive Dems, and hippies like me, were pissed off because Single Payer wasn't included in the ACA. And that's what Tri-care is. Single payer. For the Troops. You know, socialized medicine.or....with a nod and a wink tell the average blue state murican you can keep your doctor and your insurance will get cheaper....
Generally, they didn't cover one or more of the following:What made them 'shit'?
A buddy of mine here in town, a private fencing contractor, was pissed when he lost his "healthcare" plan after ACA implementation. It literally did not cover ER visits, ambulance rides, or prescriptions. IMO, if a healthcare plan doesn't cover, you know, your health, I don't really know what you're spending money on. He now has a subsidized plan that actually covers those things.The ACA makes significant changes to health plan benefit design, setting uniform standards for covered benefits and cost sharing in the individual and small group markets. The ACA requires all non-grandfathered plans in the individual and small group markets, including those sold both inside and outside the Marketplaces, to cover ten categories of essential health benefits.21 These categories include:
- Ambulatory patient services
- Emergency services
- Hospitalization
- Maternity and newborn care
- Mental health and substance use disorders, including behavioral health treatment
- Prescription drugs
- Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
- Laboratory services
- Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management
- Pediatric services, including vision and dental care
Makes sense for policies like that.Generally, they didn't cover one or more of the following:
A buddy of mine here in town, a private fencing contractor, was pissed when he lost his "healthcare" plan after ACA implementation. It literally did not cover ER visits, ambulance rides, or prescriptions. IMO, if a healthcare plan doesn't cover, you know, your health, I don't really know what you're spending money on. He now has a subsidized plan that actually covers those things.
I think everyone should have to at least go through the motions of checking coverage in the individual markets for themselves... just to see how fucked up it is. Single-payer can't come too soon.Makes sense for policies like that.
We've been in the individual market for 15 years as a family, as have many of my self employed friends, and our policies took a turn for the worse with ACA despite having coverage in the above listed areas.
Our current $1500+/mo policy is crap compared to what we had previously; higher co-pays/deductilbles, higher med costs, my wife lost most of her doctors etc.
It's been pretty infuriating.
That's what health insurance costs. The issue isn't the ACA and/or the individual market. I work for the largest regional airline in the world and my monthly health insurance costs 1290(ish) dollars a month for a family of three, and believe me, it's not great. The only "benefit" I get from an employer plan is that they claim they are picking up 2/3rds the cost (To be clear, I'm not sure I believe this). For the same price I could get tons of plans on the CO state exchange and have better benefits. It took 2 months for my wife to get in to see a specialist for her colitis. I'm due for another annual check up. Earliest I can be seen is 6 weeks out.Makes sense for policies like that.
We've been in the individual market for 15 years as a family, as have many of my self employed friends, and our policies took a turn for the worse with ACA despite having coverage in the above listed areas.
Our current $1500+/mo policy is crap compared to what we had previously; higher co-pays/deductilbles, higher med costs, my wife lost most of her doctors etc.
It's been pretty infuriating.
I do this every time its "benefits" election season, and it makes me nuts.I think everyone should have to at least go through the motions of checking coverage in the individual markets for themselves... just to see how fucked up it is. Single-payer can't come too soon.
When I went back to school the University supplied insurance program was no deductible and only cost about $2k/year. I have often thought that it may be cheaper to enroll full time at a community college and purchase student insurance than it would be to purchase insurance on your own.I know someone who is self insured, diabetic and with their premiums + annual out of pocket expenses pays almost $900 average per month.
That's insane.
My family HDHP plan through Anthem costs $1,454/mo, up from $1,219 a few years ago. I pay $19 of that.That's what health insurance costs. The issue isn't the ACA and/or the individual market. I work for the largest regional airline in the world and my monthly health insurance costs 1290(ish) dollars a month for a family of three, and believe me, it's not great. The only "benefit" I get from an employer plan is that they claim they are picking up 2/3rds the cost (To be clear, I'm not sure I believe this). For the same price I could get tons of plans on the CO state exchange and have better benefits. It took 2 months for my wife to get in to see a specialist for her colitis. I'm due for another annual check up. Earliest I can be seen is 6 weeks out.
When I was at UW as a grad student, pre-ACA, the plan capped at $1M lifetime benefit. One of my classmates got leukemia during school, hit that limit, and then died with a ton of bills...When I went back to school the University supplied insurance program was no deductible and only cost about $2k/year. I have often thought that it may be cheaper to enroll full time at a community college and purchase student insurance than it would be to purchase insurance on your own.
I'd be really curious to see how much single payer would cost. Obviously under the current system I pay some amount per year, and my employer pays some amount per year, how much on top of that would be required to institute a single payer system?I think everyone should have to at least go through the motions of checking coverage in the individual markets for themselves... just to see how fucked up it is. Single-payer can't come too soon.
That's the problem, shit's expensive. Not addressing that (rationing! no paying for $100k/month treatments for people 6 months from death's door...) won't solve the problem.I'd be really curious to see how much single payer would cost. Obviously under the current system I pay some amount per year, and my employer pays some amount per year, how much on top of that would be required to institute a single payer system?
Yup and yup. Single-payer ain't gonna work very well on a state-by-state basis. We, as a country, have to accept that healthcare is a fundamental privilege of a *real* 1st world nation.That's the problem, shit's expensive. Not addressing that (rationing! no paying for $100k/month treatments for people 6 months from death's door...) won't solve the problem.
See the Colorado single payer plan that instituted a 10% income tax up to $450k income, and still would likely have been insolvent from what I read... (thus part of the reason why I didn't support it despite generally being a flaming liberal)
Applying for death or applying to be a member of the panel? I think I would be great as a panel member.wait ... are we bringing back death panels?
I am SO applying for my local death panel