I can't tell where you are going with all this.
Are you saying Clinton was right in bombing Iraq?
Are you saying the intel. on Iraq was accurate?
Just what is your point?
Clinton bombed Iraq for political cover, I have not read a posting yet saying he was justified for doing so.
Bush invaded Iraq for many reasons. The top two from my perspective (in no particular order) were:
1. The invasion was planned before 9/11.
2. The citizens of this country were still winded from being gut punched by Al Qaeda. The invasion of Afganistan didn't ferret out bin Laden and people were needing more revenge.
The common thread between Clinton and Bush is Iraq and bombs. The scapegoats are the same.
What differs for Bush is that The Project for a New American Century has high ranking memebers in Bush's cabinent. The invasion of Iraq was a goal of this group BEFORE Bush was appointed/elected. I am doubtful you read the reports on the projects website, but you may have. If so what did they say? Who are other target countries?
You seem to be atempting to link Clinton and Bush together on the Iraq issue and your not making your case.
Oh, I'm still pissed about the hypocrit remark. To put your narrow mind at ease sport, I have been and will continue to be one of Clinton's biggest critics. I am no fan of him or his legacy.
Remember I'm not even a Democrat.
So N8 I challange you, one man to another, to either make your case using logic and critical analysis backed with evidence or stop with the half-assed sophmoric atempts. This is a debate forum not the propeganda forum.
Are you saying Clinton was right in bombing Iraq?
Are you saying the intel. on Iraq was accurate?
Just what is your point?
Clinton bombed Iraq for political cover, I have not read a posting yet saying he was justified for doing so.
Bush invaded Iraq for many reasons. The top two from my perspective (in no particular order) were:
1. The invasion was planned before 9/11.
2. The citizens of this country were still winded from being gut punched by Al Qaeda. The invasion of Afganistan didn't ferret out bin Laden and people were needing more revenge.
The common thread between Clinton and Bush is Iraq and bombs. The scapegoats are the same.
What differs for Bush is that The Project for a New American Century has high ranking memebers in Bush's cabinent. The invasion of Iraq was a goal of this group BEFORE Bush was appointed/elected. I am doubtful you read the reports on the projects website, but you may have. If so what did they say? Who are other target countries?
You seem to be atempting to link Clinton and Bush together on the Iraq issue and your not making your case.
Oh, I'm still pissed about the hypocrit remark. To put your narrow mind at ease sport, I have been and will continue to be one of Clinton's biggest critics. I am no fan of him or his legacy.
Remember I'm not even a Democrat.
So N8 I challange you, one man to another, to either make your case using logic and critical analysis backed with evidence or stop with the half-assed sophmoric atempts. This is a debate forum not the propeganda forum.
